ctpp-news

ctpp-news@mailman.chrispy.net

2560 discussions

by ed christopher

From: census2000(a)ccmc.org Budget Inaction Delays American Community Survey Launch; Census Bureau Will Release Adjusted 2000 Numbers Plus: General Accounting Office Reviews ACS Methods; New ACS Data Released; A Look Ahead At Census Oversight In The 108th Congress; and more. The Census Bureau will not launch its proposed American Community Survey (ACS) nationwide as planned in 2003 after Congress failed to enact new funding levels for most federal agencies before adjourning for the year. The lack of an appropriations bill for the fiscal year that started October 1st leaves the bureau operating at fiscal year 2002 spending levels at least until January 11, when a temporary funding measure (called a Continuing Resolution) expires. When the 108th Congress convenes on January 7, legislators could take up unfinished fiscal year 2003 (FY03) spending measures or simply extend the Continuing Resolution, leaving most agencies with no funding increase over last years levels. Traditionally, the Presidents federal budget request for the next fiscal year arrives on Capitol Hill in early February, raising the specter that Congress will be considering FY03 and FY04 allocations at the same time. Nationwide implementation of the ACS in FY03 would have required $124 million, more than double last years budget of roughly $60 million. Instead, the Census Bureau will continue collecting data in 31 test sites and from a national sample of 700,000 housing units called the Supplementary Survey. The House of Representatives Appropriations Committee did not consider a Fiscal Year 2003 Commerce, Justice, and State, The Judiciary and Related Agencies funding bill, which includes the Census Bureau. The Senate Appropriations Committee approved its version of the Commerce measure in July, but the full Senate did not take up the bill. S. 2778 did not include the funding increase for the ACS that the Administration had requested. Despite the bleak funding outlook for the ACS in the near term, stakeholders continued to advocate for full funding and nationwide implementation of the program. Groups recently expressing support for the ACS include the National Association of Towns and Townships, National Conference of State Legislatures, and the Congressional Black Caucus. Ninth Circuit Ruling To Stand In Case Seeking Adjusted Numbers: The Census Bureau will publicly release statistically adjusted Census 2000 population numbers after the U.S. Department of Justice decided not to appeal an October 8th court ruling in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found in Margaret Carter and Susan Castillo v. United States Department of Commerce (No. 02-35161) that the adjusted data were not predecisional and did not fall under the deliberative privilege exception to the FOIA. The three-judge appeals panel unanimously affirmed an Oregon federal judges ruling that the Commerce Department could not withhold the adjusted numbers by claiming that the data were protected by a FOIA exemption for information that is part of the decision-making process. State Senators Margaret Carter (D-Portland) and Susan Castillo (D-Eugene) had argued that the adjusted numbers were the subject of the Secretarys March 2001 decision not to adjust the census, and therefore were a final agency product subject to release under FOIA. Their FOIA request sought block level census data, adjusted based on the 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E. survey), for the entire country. In rejecting the Commerce Departments arguments, the Ninth Circuit said the deliberative process privilege ensures that agencies are not forced to operate in a fishbowl and that FOIA requests do not discourage candid discussion within the agency. The court pointed to the lower courts finding that release of adjusted population numbers by themselves would not reveal any protected decision-making process, and noted that the Census Bureau has already disclosed the method and procedures used to generate the adjusted data in 2000, as well as the factors it considered important in deciding which data to release as the official census numbers. The court relied heavily on its ruling ten years ago in Assembly of California v. United States Department of Commerce, 968 F.2d 916 (9th Cir. 1992), in which California legislators successfully sued for release of its adjusted census numbers under the Freedom of Information Act after the Commerce Secretary decided against using the data for any official purpose. In the Census 2000 case, Circuit Court Judge Alfred T. Goodwin, who authored the opinion, said the Oregon district courts finding that the adjusted data did not meet the standards of the FOIAs deliberative process privilege was supported by the record and in accordance with binding Ninth Circuit law. After the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling, several census stakeholder organizations urged Attorney General John Ashcroft not to appeal the decision, noting the clear and consistent judicial guidance that FOIA does not shield adjusted census numbers from public scrutiny. Public release of the A.C.E.-adjusted data would give local overnments, community planners, and researchers a deeper understanding of Census 2000 results, and advance debate over the most effective ways to improve accuracy and quality in the 2010 census, the organizations wrote in an October 25th letter. (A copy of the letter is available on the Census 2000 Initiative web site at www.census2000.org.) The Ninth Circuits ruling and public release of the data do not compel any official use of the adjusted numbers. Rep. Dave Weldon (R-FL), chairman of the Subcommittee on Civil Service, Census and Agency Organization, told the Associated Press that use of the adjusted numbers would be as flawed as the data itself. Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), former ranking member on the House census oversight subcommittee, called the resolution of the case a victory for open government. Now that these data will be make available, the public and scientists can finally judge for themselves which data was more accurate, the congresswoman said in a written statement. In 2001, the Secretary of Commerce and the Census Bureau concluded that the A.C.E.-adjusted numbers were not sufficiently reliable for congressional redistricting and allocating federal program funds. Those decisions, however, do not preclude state and local governments from using adjusted census data for their own redistricting or program purposes. The Justice Department did not explain its reasons for not appealing the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Census Bureau has not announced a schedule for release of the adjusted numbers. Other Legal News: A week before issuing its opinion in the FOIA case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld, by a 2 1 vote, a lower courts dismissal of a case filed by the City of Los Angeles and other municipalities, seeking to overturn the decision not to adjust the 2000 census. Los Angeles challenged the legality of Commerce Secretary Donald Evans decision to release only unadjusted census data for ongressional redistricting and federal program formulas. In April 2001, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Feess ruled that the Secretary based his decision on sufficient evidence that the raw census numbers were the most accurate available, thereby meeting the objectives of the Census Act (title 13, United States Code). Los Angeles had asked the Ninth Circuit to review the dismissal of its claim; it will not appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. General Accounting Office Issues Report On ACS: The U.S. General Accounting Office released a report, The American Community Survey: Accuracy and Timeliness Issues (GAO-02-956R), requested last March by census panel Chairman Dave Weldon and former Chairman Dan Miller (R-FL). The legislators asked Congress audit and investigative arm to review a range of issues related to the ACS design, methodology, and content. The GAO concluded that while accuracy and timeliness are important measures of survey quality, it could not provide an overall comparison between the ACS and the traditional census long form because there is no one formula to determine the relative importance of the components. The report said that ACS data would be significantly more timely than long form data but that annual (single year) ACS data would be less accurate than data collected from a long form in the 2010 census because of the presumed, far larger sample size for the long form (3 million housing units annually for the ACS versus 20 million housing units for the 2010 census). The GAO looked at several measures of accuracy, including sampling error (accuracy of estimates based on sample size and design) and nonsampling error (accuracy based on operational and methodological problems, such as nonresponse, duplication, and geo-coding mistakes). The GAO also evaluated whether proposed ACS questions duplicate those asked on other federal surveys and if the reporting burden on the American public could be reduced. The auditors found substantial overlap in socio-economic questions between the ACS and several ongoing household surveys, and recommended that the Census Bureau determine whether any questions on the American Housing Survey and the Current Population Survey could be eliminated. Other issues the GAO explored were the effects of conducting the ACS as a voluntary, rather than mandatory, survey; justification for questions asked on the ACS; the usefulness of ACS data to other federal agencies; and the effectiveness of interviewer training and outreach efforts in the ACS test program. Last month, the GAO also released two new reports evaluating components of Census 2000: 2000 Census: Lessons Learned for Planning a More Cost-Effective 2010 Census (GAO-02-40) and 2000 Census: Complete Costs of Coverage Evaluation Programs Are Not Available (GAO-02-41). GAOs reports are available on-line (www.gao.gov), by telephone (202-512-6000 or TDD/202-512-2537), and by fax (202-512-6061). ACS test site data released: Late last month, the Census Bureau released the first set of data for 2001 from its American Community Survey test sites. The data include comparisons from 2000 to 2001 (called change profiles) for sites with 250,000 or greater population and single year data for sites with 65,000 or greater population, as well as more than 100 core tables for sites over 65,000 population. The change and single year profiles are available on the American Community Survey web site at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/. The core tables are available on American FactFinder (part of the Census Bureaus web site) at http://factfinder.census.gov. While data from the ACS test sites and supplementary survey have generally been available in the summer of each year, the Census Bureau delayed release of the information to avoid confusion with Census 2000 long form data, which were published on a flow basis through October of this year. Looking Ahead: Census Oversight in the 108th Congress: The top legislators on committees and subcommittees that oversee and fund the Census Bureau are likely to change in the 108th Congress as a result of the November 5th elections and congressional rules. In the Senate, Republicans will assume the chairmanships of all committees and subcommittees by virtue of their majority status. While no official decisions have been made, it is likely that Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) will chair the Committee on Governmental Affairs, the Census Bureaus authorizing committee. The panels former senior Republican member, Sen. Fred Thompson (R-TN), retired. Outgoing chairman Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), will become the committees ranking minority member. The committee oversees and sets policy for the Census Bureau. Although Republicans maintained their majority and control of all chairmanships in the House, anticipated changes at the helm of several committees will affect the Census Bureau. Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN) will step down as head of the Committee on Government Reform after serving three terms as chair, the maximum allowed in the House. Several senior Republican members of the panel, which authorizes bureau activities, are vying to succeed Rep. Burton. The chairmanship of the Subcommittee on Civil Service, Census and Agency Organization could change hands when the committee organizes in January or February, as panel Republicans seek to fill vacancies at the helm of two other subcommittees. 2010 Census Tests To Begin Next Year: The Census Bureau will conduct two significant tests in 2003 and 2004 as part of planning for the 2010 decennial census. The 2003 National Census Test, a 250,000 housing unit mail-out/mail-back only survey, will examine ways to increase self-response (such as Internet response) and to improve the collection of race and ethnic data, including the possibility of eliminating Some Other Race as an option on the race question. The 2004 Census Field Test will examine possible operational improvements for 2010, including hand-held computing devices for enumerators and targeted mail-out of Spanish language questionnaires. The field test will take place in part of Queens County, New York; Lake County, IL; and Colquitt, Thomas, and Tift counties in Georgia. Also in 2004, the Census Bureau will use administrative records to test the feasibility of counting private American citizens living abroad in the next census. The test will focus on several countries with significant American populations. Final News Alert: This is the final News Alert of the Census 2000 Initiative. The Communications Consortium Media Center (CCMC) is grateful to the many organizations and individuals that received our news updates over the past several years, for their deep interest in an accurate census that collects a range of critical demographic and socio-economic information. As development of the American Community Survey and planning for the 2010 census continue, CCMC will explore the creation of a similar outreach project in the future. In the meantime, past News Alerts, stakeholder letters, and fact sheets about the census and the ACS will continue to be available on the Census 2000 Initiative web site at www.census2000.org. Questions about the information contained in this News Alert may be directed to Terri Ann Lowenthal at 202/484-2270 or, by e-mail at <terriann2k(a)aol.com>. For copies of previous News Alerts and other information, use our web site www.census2000.org. Please direct all requests to receive News Alerts, and all changes in address/phone/fax/e-mail, to the Census 2000 Initiative at <Census2000(a)ccmc.org> or 202/326-8700. Please feel free to circulate this information to colleagues and other interested individuals.

22 years, 1 month

Correction to the Update on the Houston Session of NHI Course on Travel Surveys

by Ben Williams

I have been corrected by NHI. The NHI fee for this course will be $ 400 per person starting in January. This doesn't include a hotel room. I am putting together the final course class now. Course Number: 151034A Course Title: Development and Implementation of Travel Surveys I want to thank the large number of people who expressed an interest in holding the Travel Surveys Course. We have made arrangements for a session to be held January 21-23,2003 in Houston Texas. The course will be at the Hilton Hotel next to Hobby Airport. 8181 Airport Boulevard, Houston, TX 77061-4142 Tel: 1-713-645-3000 Fax: 1-713-645-1409 http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml;jsessionid=XDGETVDFQTCHXJ31A… Length (Days) CEU FEE 3 Days 1.8 Units $ 345 Per Participant Class Size: Maximum 30 We need to now put together a committed list of students. Slots will be filled on a first come first serve basis. Please send me the names of attendees, agency, address, phone number, email address. If there are more interested parties than we can accommodate in this session their information will be passed on to the Course coordinator for future sessions. The current instructors for the course are David Pearson from the Texas Transportation Institute and Jerry Everett from the University of Tennessee. NHI is currently redoing their contracts for all of the courses so there is a possibility that the instructors may change. Ben Williams, P.E. Metropolitan Planning Specialist Federal Highway Administration Southern Resource Center V (404) 562-3671 F (404) 562-3700 ben.williams(a)fhwa.dot.gov Web Site www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenters/southern

22 years, 1 month

Re: [CTPP] Update on the NHTS

by George Petrek

Howdy Folks, Is the Journey to Work data available for Texas and if so what is the web site? Thanks! Sincerely, Cheyenne (George Petrek) Engineering Spec III TPP, Traffic Analysis Section P.O. Box 149217 Austin, TX 78714-9217 phone: (512) 486-5140 fax: (512) 486-5153 e-mail: gpetrek(a)dot.state.tx.us

22 years, 1 month

RE: [CTPP] Census 1980 Urbanized Areas - Maps

by Jim Hubbell

I recently looked into this, and learned that the 1980 UZA boundaries were never digitized by the Census. You might check with other agencies in your region to see if it was done independently. Jim Hubbell ***************** Transportation Planner Mid-America Regional Council 600 Broadway Suite 300 Kansas City, MO 64105 (816) 474-4240 (816) 421-7758 fax -----Original Message----- From: Haila Maze [mailto:HailaM@bcdcog.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:41 AM To: Ctpp-News Maillist Subject: [CTPP] Census 1980 Urbanized Areas - Maps Is anyone aware of a place we can obtain ArcView shapefiles (or compatible format) of the Census 1980 urbanized areas? Thanks. Haila R. Maze, AICP Senior Planner Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Council of Goverments 5290 Rivers Avenue, Suite 400 North Charleston, SC 29406 (843) 529-0400 (843) 529-0305 fax hailam(a)bcdcog.com

22 years, 1 month

RE: [CTPP] Census 1980 Urbanized Areas - Maps

by Srinivasan, Nanda <FHWA>

I know that the USGS made an effort to work on Urban areas for 1980, but these may have been different from Census urbanized areas. I think the USGS data is documented in the national atlas for geospatial data. The website is: http://nationalatlas.gov/natlas/NewLayerList.asp Thanks Nanda Srinivasan >>> JHUBBELL(a)MARC.ORG 11/21/02 09:58AM >>> I recently looked into this, and learned that the 1980 UZA boundaries were never digitized by the Census. You might check with other agencies in your region to see if it was done independently. Jim Hubbell ***************** Transportation Planner Mid-America Regional Council 600 Broadway Suite 300 Kansas City, MO 64105 (816) 474-4240 (816) 421-7758 fax -----Original Message----- From: Haila Maze [mailto:HailaM@bcdcog.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:41 AM To: Ctpp-News Maillist Subject: [CTPP] Census 1980 Urbanized Areas - Maps Is anyone aware of a place we can obtain ArcView shapefiles (or compatible format) of the Census 1980 urbanized areas? Thanks. Haila R. Maze, AICP Senior Planner Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Council of Goverments 5290 Rivers Avenue, Suite 400 North Charleston, SC 29406 (843) 529-0400 (843) 529-0305 fax hailam(a)bcdcog.com

22 years, 1 month

Update on NHI Course Travel Surveys Location

by Ben Williams

Course Number: 151034A Course Title: Development and Implementation of Travel Surveys I want to thank the large number of people who expressed an interest in holding the Travel Surveys Course. We have made arrangements for a session to be held January 21-23,2003 in Houston Texas. The course will be at the Hilton Hotel next to Hobby Airport. 8181 Airport Boulevard, Houston, TX 77061-4142 Tel: 1-713-645-3000 Fax: 1-713-645-1409 http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml;jsessionid=XDGETVDFQTCHXJ31A… Length (Days) CEU FEE 3 Days 1.8 Units $ 345 Per Participant Class Size: Maximum 30 We need to now put together a committed list of students. Slots will be filled on a first come first serve basis. Please send me the names of attendees, agency, address, phone number, email address. If there are more interested parties than we can accommodate in this session their information will be passed on to the Course coordinator for future sessions. The current instructors for the course are David Pearson from the Texas Transportation Institute and Jerry Everett from the University of Tennessee. NHI is currently redoing their contracts for all of the courses so there is a possibility that the instructors may change. Ben Williams, P.E. Metropolitan Planning Specialist Federal Highway Administration Southern Resource Center V (404) 562-3671 F (404) 562-3700 ben.williams(a)fhwa.dot.gov Web Site www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenters/southern

22 years, 1 month

Census 1980 Urbanized Areas - Maps

by Haila Maze

Is anyone aware of a place we can obtain ArcView shapefiles (or compatible format) of the Census 1980 urbanized areas? Thanks. Haila R. Maze, AICP Senior Planner Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Council of Goverments 5290 Rivers Avenue, Suite 400 North Charleston, SC 29406 (843) 529-0400 (843) 529-0305 fax hailam(a)bcdcog.com

22 years, 1 month

Update on the NHTS

by Nancy Mcguckin

Update on the Status of the 2001 National Household Travel Survey The 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) is the most current inventory of the nation's daily and long-distance travel. This survey combined the NPTS, a data series collected since 1969 by the FHWA and focused on daily travel, and the ATS (American Travel Survey) which collects information on longer-distance trips. The preliminary data is scheduled for release in January 2003. A workshop and roll-out of the NHTS 2001 is being planned for Sunday, January 12th (1:30-5:00 PM) at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. The data will also be available on the web, and updated according to the following schedule. Schedule of Data Release: January 2003 - Preliminary data released (national sample with daily trips only). This preliminary release will include weighted data representing the nation's daily travel. The data will be available on the NPTS data series website with a User's Guide and the on-line analysis tool at: www-cta.ornl.gov/npts Spring 2003 - Second release (national sample with daily and long-distance trips). The second release is the full continuum of travel for the nation, including daily and longer-distance (over 50 miles from home) travel. The reporting period for long distance travel was a 28-day recall period with the travel day as the last day. Summer 2003 * The final, full data set is released for public use. The final release includes all national data, daily and long-distance travel, plus the additional samples from the nine add-on areas correctly weighted and edited to represent the nation's travel. Published results begin to be released with the final dataset. Hope to see you at TRB! Nancy McGuckin Travel Behavior Analyst (202) 366-8750 Nancy.McGuckin(a)fhwa.dot.gov

22 years, 1 month

PUMS release dates

by Chuck Purvis

TO: CTPP-News I'm cross-posting an e-mail exchange on the State Data Center listserv regarding the schedule for the release of the 1-percent and 5-percent Public Use Microdata Sample. Not great news. CLP ****************************************************************************************************************************** Chuck and others, It looks like March 2003 is the date for the 1-percent PUMS (a few months delayed). 5-percent is expected to be out summer 2003 according to PUMS staff. David Joye New Jersey State Data Center New Jersey Department of Labor PO Box 388 Trenton, NJ 08625-0388 609-984-2216 Phone 609-984-6833 Fax djoye(a)dol.state.nj.us Labor Fast Facts www.state.nj.us/labor/lra -----Original Message----- From: owner-sdc_mlist(a)uclink4.berkeley.edu [mailto:owner-sdc_mlist@uclink4.berkeley.edu]On Behalf Of Chuck Purvis Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:14 PM To: sdc_mlist(a)uclink.berkeley.edu Subject: PUMS Release Dates TO: SDC Steering Committee In the notes from the national SDC conference, Jay Waite of the Census Bureau notes that the "PUMS should come out March 2003 on schedule" It this the 5-percent PUMS or the 1-percent PUMS? My guess would be the 5-percent PUMS since the 1-percent PUMS is expected by the end of December 2002. And does the "March 2003" date really mean: "on a flow basis throughout March 2003"? Thanks in advance! Chuck Purvis, MTC ************************************************************** Charles L. Purvis, AICP Senior Transportation Planner/Analyst Metropolitan Transportation Commission 101 Eighth Street Oakland, CA 94607-4700 (510) 464-7731 (office) (510) 464-7848 (fax) www: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/ Census WWW: http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/ **************************************************************

22 years, 1 month

Place of Residence Profile Sheets from Census Transportation Planning Package

by phillip.a.salopek＠census.gov

CTPP PROFILES (November 12, 2002) The first data product of the Census Transportation Planning Package 2000 (CTPP2000) is now available. The Census Bureau has prepared profile sheets for states and counties, which are posted on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) web page at http://www.transportation.org/ctpp in both html format and pdf format. The html format can be read easily into a spreadsheet while the pdf format can be printed easily. One convenience of these profile sheets is that they include data from both 1990 and 2000 for some basic characteristics such as household size, vehicle availability, means of transportation to work, and travel time to work. Notes about the data in the CTPP profiles: 1. GEOGRAPHIC LEVEL REPORTED: Data are limited in most cases to state and county totals. In six states, (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) data for minor civil divisions (MCD) are also included. 2. DATA ROUNDING: In CTPP 2000 and other special tabulations from Census 2000, figures that do not duplicate data released in standard census products are being rounded. Therefore, certain tables in the CTPP profile sheets contain rounded numbers. In these tables values from 1 through 7 have been rounded to 4, and values greater than or equal to 8 have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 5. 3. DATA SOURCE IS DECENNIAL CENSUS LONG FORM: All of the data in the CTPP Profile are from the "long form." The data will not match the short form (100% count) data exactly. 4. MICROSOFT EXCEL 97 PROBLEM: There is a display problem when the CTPP2000 profiles in html format are opened in Microsoft Excel 97. The problem is that the second column (column B) of the spreadsheet is hidden from view. To display column B, right-click the mouse over either the column A or column C header, and choose Unhide from the pop-up menu. This problem appears to be corrected in later versions of Microsoft Excel. 5. MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK: Public transportation includes bus or trolley bus, streetcar or trolley car, subway or elevated, railroad, ferryboat, and taxicab. In subsequent CTPP2000 tabulations, taxicab will generally be included in the "other means" category. However, in the CTPP profiles taxicab has been included in public transportation, similar to aggregations used in the Census 2000 demographic profiles. 6. TRAVEL TIME TO WORK: In the 1990 Census (including the CTPP data), the maximum travel time assigned to any worker was 99 minutes. Workers who reported travel times of 100 minutes or more were top-coded to 99 minutes in 1990. The maximum travel time was increased to 200 minutes for Census 2000, thus the 2000 data are more accurate because they include the actual value for these long trips. The impact of this coding change is that increases in travel time between 1990 and 2000 are somewhat over-stated. At the national level, the Census Bureau estimates that about 29% (0.9 minutes) of the 3.1-minute increase in average travel time between 1990 and 2000 is attributable to the coding change. 7. HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999: In a small number of cases, the mean household income and median household income figures shown in the CTPP2000 profiles differ from those published in other Census 2000 products. These differences of one dollar are the result of software rounding differences and hardware numeric precision differences between the two platforms used to create the products. 8. VEHICLES AVAILABLE: The data in CTPP2000 on vehicles available are tabulated for households. This is different than in standard census products, where data on vehicles available are tabulated for housing units. Although the estimates are usually quite close, the number of housing units is not always equal to the number of households, because the Census Bureau calculates weights differently for housing units and households. Therefore, the distribution of vehicles available shown in CTPP2000 will not exactly match the distribution (or mean number of vehicles per household) presented in standard census products from either 1990 or 2000. For additional information about CTPP2000 products, please see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ctpp/content.htm or http://www.trbcensus.com

22 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

ctpp-news