Subject: Census 2000 News Alert
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 18:27:12 -0400
From: Keri Monihan <kmonihan(a)ccmc.org>
May 12, 1998
NEWS ALERT
House Census Panel Challenges Portrayal of 1990 Census as a
Failure
Hearing Scheduled to Review Data Collection on Census 'Long
Form'
At a May 5 hearing to review the results of the 1990 census,
the chairman of the congressional census oversight panel
suggested that the last decennial count was not the failure
portrayed by many stakeholders. Rep. Dan Miller (R-FL),
chairman of the Subcommittee on the Census, called 1990 "a
pretty good census, the second most accurate in census
history" because it counted 98.4 percent of the population.
On the other hand, the chairman said, "[s]ampling was the
failure in 1990."
Wade Henderson, executive director of the Leadership
Conference on Civil Rights, disagreed, noting that the 1990
census was the first "in five decades [to be] less accurate
than its predecessor" and that the "differential undercount
was the highest ever recorded." "To those who are willing
to settle for similar results in 2000," Mr. Henderson asked,
"how will we explain this to persons who are among the
undercounted?" He also reminded the subcommittee that many
of their colleagues, both Republicans and Democrats, had
called the 1990 census a failure and supported the use of
sampling methods to correct the undercount at that time.
The subcommittee also heard from a panel of two
statisticians and one demographer. Dr. Jerry Coffey, a
mathematical statistician retired from OMB; Dr. Philip
Stark, Professor of Statistics at UC Berkeley; and Kenneth
Darga, a demographer with the State of Michigan, said that
based on their review of Census Bureau evaluations of the
1990 census provided by the subcommittee, they believed the
methods used to measure how many people were missed were too
flawed to give an accurate result. Dr. Stark said that the
Bureau's undercount figures reflected more problems with the
methods themselves than an actual undercount. "Adjustment
puts in far more error than it takes out," Dr. Stark
concluded. Dr. Coffey said that the larger sample for the
post-census quality check survey would not solve the
problems of statistical errors in the adjustment methods.
Dr. Stark was quoted in The Washington Times on May 6 as
saying that he disagreed with the findings of several
National Academy of Sciences panels because "I place more
trust on evidence than on letterheads. There is no data and
no mathematical theory to support the use of sampling in
this way." The subcommittee did not invite witnesses who
believe the Census Bureau's methodology is sound or who had
participated in the evaluations of the 1990 census.
Rep. Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), chairman of the census oversight
panel during the 1990 count, and Rep. Thomas Petri (R-WI),
senior Republican on the census subcommittee when planning
for the 2000 census began, also testified and urged their
colleagues to reduce the political rhetoric surrounding the
census.
Congressional hearing notice: The House Subcommittee on the
Census will hold a hearing on Thursday, May 21, to review
the proposed questions that will be asked on the so-called
'short' and 'long' forms in the 2000 census. The hearing
will begin at 1:00 p.m., in Room 2247 Rayburn House Office
Building. The subcommittee has not yet announced a witness
list.
Race and ethnicity update: The Census Bureau's various
advisory committees will hold a joint meeting on June 3 to
discuss the tabulation of multiple responses to the race
question in the 2000 census and other surveys. A task force
set up by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been
working to develop standards for tabulating the data when
respondents check off more than one race. OMB decided last
October, as part of a comprehensive review of its policy on
racial and ethnic categories, to allow more than one
response when Federal agencies collect data on race. The
day-long advisory committee meeting, which is open to the
public, will take place at the Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites,
625 First St., Alexandria, VA. Please call Carol McDaniel
(301/457-2308) at the Census Bureau for more information.
Legal update: Several new parties have weighed in on the
side of plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of
sampling in the census. The State of Wisconsin and more than
a dozen organizations, including Americans for Tax Reform
and the American Conservative Union, filed amicus curiae
briefs in the lawsuit filed by the House of Representatives
at the direction of Speaker Newt Gingrich. Wisconsin sued
to prevent an adjustment of the 1990 census, fearing the
loss of a congressional seat to California. Population
projections show that the state is likely to lose a
congressional district following the 2000 census.
The Pennsylvania counties of Bucks and Delaware, and DuPage
County, Illinois, have moved to intervene in Glavin v.
Clinton, which also asks the courts to rule that the
Constitution does not permit sampling. Cobb County,
Georgia, is an original plaintiff in Glavin. More than two
dozen Georgia counties sued the government during the 1990
census to force a correction of the undercount using
sampling methods. The post-census survey showed that Bucks
and Delaware Counties were overcounted in 1990.
Stakeholder activities: The chair of the 2000 Census
Advisory Committee, Mayor Ann Azari (Ft. Collins, CO) sent a
letter on April 17 to Commerce Secretary William M. Daley,
expressing concerns raised by committee members at their
March quarterly meeting. Referring to ongoing debates over
key census issues, Mayor Azari said that the "credibility"
of both the Census Bureau and the census process were at
stake and urged "reinforcement that the Census Bureau is a
credible, capable, professional organization [that] is the
best in class at what they do." Noting the continued
uncertainty over how the next census will be taken, the
Advisory Committee urged the Secretary to provide
comprehensive information on the census process to Congress
so that an "intelligent and informed" decision on census
methods could be made. Azari also said that new census
methods have been the subject of controversy in the past,
noting that Congress questioned the transition to a
mail-based census in 1970 because the procedures hadn't been
tested on a national scale. The Census Bureau, Azari wrote,
"does have a history of innovation." The committee also
encouraged the prompt nomination of a permanent Bureau
director and attention to the "basic building blocks," such
as address lists and promotion, that are needed to take a
good census.
The next quarterly meeting of the 2000 Census Advisory
Committee will be June 11-12, at Census Bureau headquarters
in Suitland, MD. The meeting is open to the public;
however, if you plan to attend, please contact Ms. Pat Ellis
at 301-457-2095 to ensure proper clearance and to obtain an
agenda.
The Subcommittee on the Census has notified us that Chairman
Dan Miller will lead a discussion sponsored by The Heritage
Foundation entitled, "Virtual Representation: Is Census
Sampling Good Enough?" Matthew Glavin, President of the
Southeastern Legal Foundation and lead plaintiff in a
lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of sampling in the
census, and Lee Price, Chief Economist (and former Acting
Under Secretary), Department of Commerce, will respond to
the chairman's remarks. The event will take place on May
19, at 12:00 p.m., at the Heritage Foundation offices.
Please call Paul Love at 202-675-1752, if you would like to
attend or for further information.
Questions about the information contained in this News Alert
may be directed to TerriAnn Lowenthal at (202) 434-8756 or,
by e-mail, at <TerriAnnL(a)aol.com>. Please feel free to
circulate this information to colleagues and other
interested individuals.
Hello everyone:
Does somebody knows if the geographical boundary for the 'puma' field in
the housing unit record correspond to the same geographical unit for
'powpuma' field (place of work puma) in the person record? If not, do
you where to find equivalence table between county and powpuma, or
county and puma?
Thank you for your cooperation,
Gustavo A. Baez
Senior Transportation Planer
North Central Texas Council of Governments
Email: gbaez(a)nctcog.dst.tx.us
Dear Mobility Proffesional,
Urban Mobility Network (http://www.mobility-net.com) is proud to present to
you the FREE monthly electronic magazine:
The Urban Mobility Professional.
Presenting to you the latest news items in the Urban Mobility branch,
including information regarding:
- Industry headlines,
- branch related events,
- information on individual experts,
- progress on ongoing research projects,
- etc.
Furthermore, each issue will include full articles, written by professionals
active in Parking, ITS, Road Construction, Urban Planning, Traffic and
Public Transport. It is intended to dedicate the respective articles to
specific branch related topics.
To receive the UMP, starting at the end of May, you can subscribe by
e-mailing the below information.
For:
E-magazine including images:
This service is only available if you have one of the following
mail-programs: Netscape 4 / Outlook Express 97/ Eudora 4 etc.). To
subscribe, please send an e-mail to mailmanager(a)mobility-net.com with the
following message in the body: join UMP
E-magazine in text format:
To subscribe, please send an e-mail to mailmanager(a)mobility-net.com with the
following message in the body: join UMP-T
If you have any question, suggestions concerning the Urban Mobility
Professional, or you would like to publish one of your articles or other
information, please e-mail to Cindy Kerckhoffs
(C.Kerckhoffs(a)mobility-net.com).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first issue will discuss information regarding the millenium problem. I
would like to ask you as an Urban Mobility expert if you are interested to
publish your views/information regarding the millenium problem in the
upcoming issue of The Urban Mobility Professional. All documents received
will be listed in The Urban Mobility Professional and added to the Urban
Mobility Library. Documents with a maximum of 1000 words will be printed in
full.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please forward this e-mail to other professionals interested in the Urban
Mobility Professional.
The recently released 1990 census data on working at home is
accessible through the census web site (http://www.census.gov).
Click on "New on the site", and then in the scrollable list on the
selection entitled:
"Census Brief, Increase in At-Home Workers Reverses Earlier Trend
(CENBR/98-2) 05/07/1998."
This will take you to a copy of the census brief in Adobe PDF format.
Additional tables on the work-at-home population (CPH-L-195) may be
found by clicking on the following entry in the scrollable list:
"Working At Home 05/07/1998,"
(http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/workathome.html)
and scrolling down to the list of 6 tables.
>From the AP newswire.
If the report is online, maybe Phil or Gloria could tell us.
05/07/98- Updated 10:58 AM ET
More Americans telecommuting
WASHINGTON - When Thomas Wolfe wrote "you can't go home again" he
obviously wasn't thinking of America's workers.
In the decade of the 1980s the number of people working at home
jumped 56%, the Census Bureau reported Thursday.
And it's no doubt a lot higher now.
Previously unpublished data from the 1990 Census showed 3,406,025
people working at home that year, 3% of all working people.
That was up from 2,179,863 who worked at home in 1980, a figure that
had been declining since it was first measured in 1960.
"The decade of the 1980s marked a rebirth of work at home in the
United States," reported Census population expert Phillip A. Salopek.
"It is noteworthy that this impressive growth occurred before the
expansion of the Internet."
Thanks to the growth of computer use, the bureau noted that a 1997
survey for Telecommute America estimated the number of people
"telecommuting" to work via computer had reached 11 million.
In 1960, when the Census Bureau first asked about working at home, it
found 4,662,750 people in that category. That fell to 2,685,144 in
1970 and continued to decline in 1980 before turning upward again.
"Quite a lot of the decrease" in working at home before 1980 was a
result of the decline in family farms, explained Census' Gloria
Swieczkowski. Why the sudden turnaround: "I don't guess we really
know that for sure."
She said Census and private population analysts are eager to see the
total who work at home in the upcoming Census 2000.
The Census report on people working at home in 1990 showed:
A slim majority, 52%, were women, although they made up just 45% of
people who worked outside the home. Home workers were 92% white, 4%
black and 5% Hispanic. Those working outside the home were 83% white,
10% black and just under 8% Hispanic. Hispanics can be member of any
race and are included in figures for blacks, whites and others. Some
54% of home workers were self-employed, compared with 5.5% of workers
outside the home.
By The Associated Press
Dear Urban Mobility Professional,
Urban Mobility Network (http://www.mobility-net.com) is proud to present to you the FREE monthly electronic magazine:
The Urban Mobility Professional.
Presenting to you the latest news items in the Urban Mobility branch, including information regarding:
a.. Industry headlines,
b.. branch related events,
c.. information on individual experts,
d.. progress on ongoing research projects,
e.. etc.
Furthermore, each issue will include full articles, written by professionals active in Parking, ITS, Road Construction, Urban Planning, Traffic and Public Transport. It is intended to dedicate the respective articles to specific branch related topics.
To receive the UMP, starting at the end of May, you can subscribe by e-mailing the below information.
For:
a.. E-magazine including images:
This service is only available if you have one of the following mail-programs: Netscape 4 / Outlook Express 97/ Eudora 4 etc.). To subscribe, please send an e-mail to mailmanager(a)mobility-net.com with the following message in the body: join UMP
a.. E-magazine in text format:
To subscribe, please send an e-mail to mailmanager(a)mobility-net.com with the following message in the body: join UMP-T
If you have any question, suggestions concerning the Urban Mobility Professional, or you would like to publish one of your articles or other information, please e-mail to Cindy Kerckhoffs (C.Kerckhoffs(a)mobility-net.com).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please forward this e-mail to other professionals interested in the
Urban Mobility Professional.
Hi,
I've taken a new step to prevent spam from ever reaching my domain which
includes ctpp-news.
I've joined the Realtime Blackhole List. This list is updated constantly to
refuse mail from known domains that are spam friendly or spam neutral. When
a machine from a domain listed on the RBL tries to send mail to my machine,
it will be rejected with a message that says that the IP address you are
sending from has been listed in the RBL.
If that every happens to you, email me at chrisp(a)tikizine.com or email
somebody on the list to let them know that you are shut out who can forward
that information to me. And then complain to your ISP. The RBL is not taken
lightly and domains that end up on the list have basically refused to take
care of spam originating from their network.
If you are interested in reading more, take a look at:
http://maps.vix.com/rbl/
I had to take this step because I currently have a 4k file that lists all
of the domains and checks in order to weed out spam. It is slowing down my
mail and becoming unwieldy to maintain.
The RBL should take care of a large majority of the truly bad spam I get
so I can pare down the file some.
Chris
Hi,
I've taken a new step to prevent spam from ever reaching my domain which
includes ctpp-news.
I've joined the Realtime Blackhole List. This list is updated constantly to
refuse mail from known domains that are spam friendly or spam neutral. When
a machine from a domain listed on the RBL tries to send mail to my machine,
it will be rejected with a message that says that the IP address you are
sending from has been listed in the RBL.
If that every happens to you, email me at chrisp(a)tikizine.com or email
somebody on the list to let them know that you are shut out who can forward
that information to me. And then complain to your ISP. The RBL is not taken
lightly and domains that end up on the list have basically refused to take
care of spam originating from their network.
If you are interested in reading more, take a look at:
http://maps.vix.com/rbl/
I had to take this step because I currently have a 4k file that lists all
of the domains and checks in order to weed out spam. It is slowing down my
mail and becoming unwieldy to maintain.
The RBL should take care of a large majority of the truly bad spam I get
so I can pare down the file some.
Chris
