Good morning TRB subcommittee friends,
This free webinar may be of interest. To register online, visit https://cc.callinfo.com/cc/s/showReg?udc=1whbwtb60q5ca
Best regards,
Eloisa
Kaiser Permanente Active Transportation Indicators
________________________________
Meeting Description:
Please join us for the Kaiser Permanente Active Transportation (AT) Indicators Webinar. During this one-hour meeting, we'll report on the results of a four-month research and outreach effort to identify exemplary efforts in measuring various aspects of Active Transportation. It will include recommended indicators and monitoring techniques for three aspects of AT: the demand for AT at both the population and user levels; the provision and quality of AT facilities; and and how well different places support AT. Following the Webinar, the final report: Measuring Active Transportation: Recommendations for Colorado will be made available for download. Please contact Vickie Jacobsen at Charlier Associates, Inc. (vickie(a)charlier.org) with any questions.
<https://cc.callinfo.com/r/1whbwtb60q5ca>
Details
Date:
Thu, Apr 19, 2012
Time:
08:00 AM MDT
Duration:
1 hour
Host(s):
Vickie Jacobsen
<http://www.cbeyond.net>
Megan & Eloisa,
In preparing a DOT presentation on Transportation and Health at a panel about social determinants of health and health disparities at NIH for Nation Minority Health Month, I sketched an outline that I think could be informative to planning next year:
Transportation's impact on health
* Transportation availability & access to care
* Transportation options & livable communities
* Transportation planning & environmental justice
As I mentioned back at the annual meeting, there is nowhere near enough research being done on bullet #1, while nos 2&3 get covered by a lot of disciplines. This subcommittee can help fill that gap. There is a need to look not only at "transportation decisions" which imply planning of projects & future impacts, but transportation use and availability and their impact on individual health outcomes. Arguably, transportation has a much larger impact on health when considered in the immediate term and on an individual scale.
To use two specific examples: certainly planning decisions can have large future aggregate impacts on air quality and respiratory health as a result - but how many people in the past year have ended up in emergency care, or, sadly, died because they were unable to get to a preventive appointment like dialysis or other chronic disease treatment? That's a much more immediate and measurable impact, yet no one can really say for sure. That's where, in my opinion, this committee has the biggest opportunity to contribute.
I think TCRP made a good foray into this area with B-27 "Cost Benefit Analysis of Providing Non-Emergency Medical Transportation,"<http://www.trb.org/Main/Public/Blurbs/156625.aspx> but this was really only a beginning, and happened 7 years ago now.
I would argue that the Public Health sector is pretty strongly engaged in the transportation discussion and it's time now to engage more people in the Health Care & Services sectors. In the long term, I think, that engagement will have benefits for all of the other questions the subcommittee considers. As hospitals, insurance companies, and other care providers better understand the direct impact of transportation on their missions and their bottom lines, the more they will support transportation options and better transportation planning. I mean how many hospitals are built today to enable, much less encourage, walking to and from? I sure haven't seen one recently. To what extent to providers consider transportation access (beyond driving & parking garages) when placing and planning new facilities? These are all very important issues which are not being researched.
I hope you will consider this broadening of scope for next year's workshop.
-Erik
Erik Weber
United We Ride -- Office of Program Management
Federal Transit Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, E44-431
Washington, DC 20590
Ph: 202.366.0705
On the Web:
www.unitedweride.gov<http://www.unitedweride.gov/>
Follow the United We Ride National Resource Center:
@NRCtrans<http://twitter.com/NRCtrans>
www.fta.dot.gov<http://www.fta.dot.gov/>
Follow FTA on Twitter:
@FTA_DOT<http://twitter.com/FTA_DOT>
P Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-----Original Message-----
From: h+t--friends-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:h+t--friends-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Megan Wier
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:28 PM
To: h+t--friends(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
Subject: [H+T--Friends] Help inform our Subcommittee's TRB 2013 Workshop Proposal!
Help inform our Subcommittee's TRB 2013 Workshop Proposal!
The Health & Transportation Subcommittee is proposing a half-day workshop for the January 2013 TRB Annual Meeting - and we are looking to our friends for help generating ideas regarding its focus.
As many of you know, at the 2012 TRB Annual Meeting there was a full-day workshop entitled "Intersection of Health and Transportation: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and How We Can Better Integrate Health Considerations into Transportation Decisions." More information regarding this workshop is available at the following link:
http://pressamp.trb.org/conferenceinteractiveprogram/EventDetails.aspx?ID=2…
.
The workshop was a great success - and generated a lot of ideas regarding research needs at the intersection of health and transportation - many of which are summarized here:
http://www.trbhealth.org/research/research-needs.
Examples include:
- Effects of travel and travel environments on social cohesion
- Parking policy as a mechanism for increasing physical activity
- Access needs of different populations
- Road safety disparities
- Health effects of new and improved infrastructure networks for active transportation modes (e.g., bike ways, sidewalks, trails)
- Local impacts of freight movement
- Health-related indicators in transportation planning
- Creating partnerships between transportation and other health-related sectors
As the Subcommittee moves forward with its work, what topics (listed at the above link - OR new ideas that you may have) do you think warrant a deeper exploration and discussion at the upcoming meeting? Are there particular areas or speakers that you think would help the subcommittee to advance research, education, and professional practice in health and transportation?
***Please email Eloisa Raynault (eloisa.raynault(a)apha.org<mailto:eloisa.raynault@apha.org>) and Megan Wier
(megan.wier(a)sfdph.org<mailto:megan.wier@sfdph.org>) with your thoughts and ideas by Friday, May 4th,
2012.***
_______________________________________________
H+T--Friends mailing list
H+T--Friends(a)ryoko.chrispy.net<mailto:H+T--Friends@ryoko.chrispy.net>
http://ryoko.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/h+t--friends
Help inform our Subcommittee's TRB 2013 Workshop Proposal!
The Health & Transportation Subcommittee is proposing a half-day workshop
for the January 2013 TRB Annual Meeting - and we are looking to our friends
for help generating ideas regarding its focus.
As many of you know, at the 2012 TRB Annual Meeting there was a full-day
workshop entitled "Intersection of Health and Transportation: What We Know,
What We Don't Know, and How We Can Better Integrate Health Considerations
into Transportation Decisions." More information regarding this workshop
is available at the following link:
http://pressamp.trb.org/conferenceinteractiveprogram/EventDetails.aspx?ID=2…
.
The workshop was a great success - and generated a lot of ideas regarding
research needs at the intersection of health and transportation - many of
which are summarized here:
http://www.trbhealth.org/research/research-needs.
Examples include:
- Effects of travel and travel environments on social cohesion
- Parking policy as a mechanism for increasing physical activity
- Access needs of different populations
- Road safety disparities
- Health effects of new and improved infrastructure networks for active
transportation modes (e.g., bike ways, sidewalks, trails)
- Local impacts of freight movement
- Health-related indicators in transportation planning
- Creating partnerships between transportation and other health-related
sectors
As the Subcommittee moves forward with its work, what topics (listed at the
above link - OR new ideas that you may have) do you think warrant a deeper
exploration and discussion at the upcoming meeting? Are there particular
areas or speakers that you think would help the subcommittee to advance
research, education, and professional practice in health and
transportation?
***Please email Eloisa Raynault (eloisa.raynault(a)apha.org) and Megan Wier
(megan.wier(a)sfdph.org) with your thoughts and ideas by Friday, May 4th,
2012.***
One big factor in checkpoint efficacy is the power of "general deterrence,"
i.e., that knowledge or expectation of a checkpoint will either have a
potential dui offender not drink and drive or simply not take the trip.
That's why it's so important to publicize the checkpoints.
Others more versed in the public health concept of deterrence, feel free to
jump in.
Phyllis
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:48 PM, <h+t--friends-request(a)chrispy.net> wrote:
> Send H+T--Friends mailing list submissions to
> h+t--friends(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://ryoko.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/h+t--friends
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> h+t--friends-request(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> h+t--friends-owner(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of H+T--Friends digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: A public health approach to preventing injuries and
> violence: Q&A with Linda Degutis for National Public Health Week
> (Dellinger, Ann (CDC/ONDIEH/NCIPC))
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:11:51 +0000
> From: "Dellinger, Ann (CDC/ONDIEH/NCIPC)" <amd1(a)cdc.gov>
> Subject: Re: [H+T--Friends] A public health approach to preventing
> injuries and violence: Q&A with Linda Degutis for National Public
> Health Week
> To: TRB Health and Transportation <h+t--friends(a)chrispy.net>
> Message-ID:
> <513D35B5D893E64EA5AA526B341709F2171EE22F(a)EMBX-CHAM4.cdc.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Current seat belt use in the US is at 84%-85%, I wouldn?t call that very
> high. Much higher in some states, much lower in others. Other high income
> countries have gotten theirs up to the mid 90?s, it?s possible and
> effective. The potential number of lives saved is more from the number
> killed in fatal crashes who were not buckled, and the ability to save about
> half given the effectiveness of seat belts. The effectiveness measures may
> change given the crashworthiness of today?s vehicles, more airbags and the
> like. We shall see.
>
> The literature for the systematic review of sobriety checkpoints can be
> found on the Community Guide website, along with methods, etc. A
> scientifically sound process. An update of the review is in the works and
> the 20% estimate will change, but it isn?t finished yet.
>
>
> Ann M. Dellinger, PhD, MPH
> Epidemiologist & Team Leader
> Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention Team
> Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention
> CDC's Injury Center
>
>
>
> From: h+t--friends-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:
> h+t--friends-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of mbrenman001(a)comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 11:45 AM
> To: TRB Health and Transportation
> Subject: Re: [H+T--Friends] A public health approach to preventing
> injuries and violence: Q&A with Linda Degutis for National Public Health
> Week
>
> I dunno, some exaggerations in this Q+A. For example, "We could have
> saved 3,688 more lives in 2009 if everyone had buckled up." The rate of
> seat belt use in the US is very high. Trying to get a few remaining
> percentage points at the tail end would probably take as much energy as the
> entire previous 90+ percent. Passive systems like multiple air bags, now
> present in even very inexpensive new cars, are saving many lives. Relying
> on seat belts as a solution is kinda old-fashioned. Been there, done that.
>
> Second, "Sobriety checkpoints have been shown to cut alcohol-related
> crashes and deaths by about 20 percent." I'd want to see the studies on
> this, and find out what the assumptions and conditions were. If the author
> means, "If sobriety checkpoints were set up on every corner in every town
> in America every night, all night long," well, maybe. But a 20% crash and
> death savings just from existing sobriety checkpoints? I'd don't believe
> it. Maybe in one small town on one night with 100% saturation and stopping
> all drivers.
>
> It's important in our business to maintain our credibility by not
> exaggerating what our initiatives can do and by being clear about the
> limits and conditions of our studies.
>
> Marc Brenman
> Social Justice Consultancy
> mbrenman001(a)comcast.net<mailto:mbrenman001@comcast.net>
> ________________________________
> From: "Eloisa Raynault" <eloisa.raynault(a)apha.org<mailto:
> eloisa.raynault(a)apha.org>>
> To: h+t--friends(a)chrispy.net<mailto:h+t--friends@chrispy.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 8:14:41 AM
> Subject: [H+T--Friends] A public health approach to preventing injuries
> and violence: Q&A with Linda Degutis for National Public Health Week
>
>
> A public health approach to preventing injuries and violence: Q&A with
> Linda Degutis
>
> As CDC's Injury Center celebrates its 20th anniversary, Linda Degutis, a
> former APHA president, reflects on the significant advances that have been
> made in the field of injury and violence prevention and her vision for
> meeting some of the challenges that lie ahead. Read more at
> http://www.publichealthnewswire.org/?p=2992
>
> Q: What is the scope of injury and violence? Where does it rank in the
> context of other public health problems?
> Past CDC director Dr. William Foege said, ?Throughout history, the two
> major causes of early death have been infectious disease and injury.?
> Today, more people ages 1?44 die from injuries than from any other cause,
> including cancer, HIV or the flu. The toll of injury and violence is
> unacceptable. Those of us in the injury prevention and research field know
> that this is a public health issue we are making great strides in, but
> there are challenges ahead that we must work to address together. Here are
> a few examples:
> We could have saved 3,688 more lives in 2009 if everyone had buckled up.
> Sobriety checkpoints have been shown to cut alcohol-related crashes and
> deaths by about 20 percent.
>
> Q: We commonly hear that injuries are not accidents. Can you give us some
> examples of what that means?
> Those of us in the injury field know that the terms ?accident,?
> ?unavoidable? or ?random act? are used too often to describe injuries and
> violence.
> It?s not random when a teen consumes alcohol, drives after dark with too
> many passengers and crashes. It?s not an accident when a new parent is
> frazzled by a crying baby and shakes the child out of frustration. An elder
> person falling is often avoidable. We know what puts people at risk.
> The field of injury prevention is providing scientific tools to reduce
> injuries and violence-related injuries. For example, graduated drivers
> licensing laws, positive parenting programs to help parents better
> understand and handle stresses, and balance strengthening programs like Tai
> Chi can help prevent falls among elders.
>
> Q: How important is it for the center to build partnerships in the policy
> and research it develops?
> We value our partners? contributions to the field of injury and violence
> prevention. Together, we move proven science-based evidence and research
> from testing to practice. I believe that marrying science and partnerships
> does result in policies that provide demonstrable improvements in public
> health ? at the federal, state and local levels and globally. The goal of
> our partner outreach is to create and maintain partnerships to support
> these strategies.
>
>
>
>
>
> Eloisa Raynault | American Public Health Association | 800 I Street, NW,
> Washington, DC 20001 | Transportation, Health and Equity Program Manager |
> o: 202-777-2487 | http://www.apha.org/transportation
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> H+T--Friends mailing list
> H+T--Friends(a)ryoko.chrispy.net<mailto:H+T--Friends@ryoko.chrispy.net>
> http://ryoko.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/h+t--friends
>
Hello everyone,
On behalf of Newsletter Editor and Subcommittee Co-Chair Eloisa Raynault,
I'm happy to announce that the first issue of the Health and Transportation
Subcommittee Newsletter, dated April 2012, is now online.
You can find it here on our newly re-designed website.
http://www.trbhealth.org/newsletter
Contents include:
* A Brief History
* Reports from TRB 2012
* Logo Contest
* Feature Article: Travel Behavior Choices
* New Resources of Note
* Selected Upcoming Events
* New Research Posted on the Website
* New Health and Transportation Blog from RWJF
* Calendar of Events
Contributors include: Ipek Nese Sener, Texas Transportation
Institute; Jessica Mark, NewPublicHealth.org and Home Front
Communications; Phyllis Orrick, Safe Transportation Research and Education
Center, UC Berkeley; Sheryl Gross-Glaser, Community Transportation
Association of America
Newsletter Editor: Eloisa Raynault, American Public Health Association
Website Redesign: Carey McAndrews
Please let us know if you have suggestions for the website or would like to
take part in any of the working groups or otherwise help us out.
Regards,
Phyllis Orrick (signing for)
Carey McAndrews
Sheryl Gross-Glaser
Communications Working Group, Subcommittee on Transportation and Health
--
Phyllis Orrick
Communications Director
Safe Transportation Research and Education Center (SafeTREC)
University of California Transportation Center (UCTC)
Institute for Urban and Regional Development (IURD)
2614 Dwight Way
UC Berkeley
Berkeley CA 94720-7374
510-643-1779
@transsafe <https://twitter.com/#!/transsafe>
@californiaUTC <https://twitter.com/#!/californiaUTC>
@IURDBerkeley <https://twitter.com/#!/iurdberkeley>
@trbhealth <https://twitter.com/#!/trbhealth>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sylvia Nam <sylvianam(a)berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:57 PM
Subject: Call for Papers - Food Studies Conference, Urbana-Champaign,
Illinois, USA, 4-5 October 2012
To: planning-announce(a)lists.berkeley.edu
> Dear Colleague,
>
> On behalf of the Food Studies Conference organizing committee, we would
like to inform you of:
>
> FOOD STUDIES: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
> 4-5 October 2012
> http://Food-Studies.com/conference
>
> This conference will address contemporary food challenges from
interdisciplinary perspectives by exploring new possibilities for
sustainable food production and human nutrition. The aim is to consider the
dimensions of a 'new green revolution' that will meet our human needs in a
more effective, equitable and sustainable way in the twenty-first century.
>
> Members of this knowledge community include academics, teachers,
administrators, policy makers and practitioners in food communities.
Contributions range from broad theoretical and global policy explorations,
to detailed studies of specific human-physiological, nutritional and social
dynamics of food. Other topics are welcome, and should focus on the food
sciences in the areas such as, but not limited to agricultural and
environmental food sciences, food industries and markets, and local and
global food sociologies.
>
> Location: In 2012, The Food Studies Conference is strategically held in
Urbana-Champaign, Illinois during the Midwestern harvest season. This is
the home of the land-grant University of Illinois, located in the United
States' agricultural heartland. With cutting-edge research at the
University, and a full range of agricultural endeavors in the community,
ranging from large agribusiness to urban farmers' markets, Urbana-Champaign
represents an ideal location for the Food Studies community to gather.
>
> This year's conference will feature a special panel discussion
highlighting Urban Food Hubs and their evolving role in the local
agribusiness and food industry arena. Conference tour activities will
feature an exclusive farm-to-table dinner at Prairie Fruits Farm where
participants will experience the slow foods movement first-hand in a unique
outdoor, field-side setting. Urbana Champaign can easily be reached by
commuter plane, train and road from Chicago and Bloomington, Illinois.
> Proposals: We welcome presentation proposals which range from broad
explorations of theoretical, methodological and policy questions, to
proposals which present finely grained evidence of the connections of
economics, public health, government and community practices, sociological,
medical and educational perspectives of food in our societies.
> Presenters will have the option to submit to be published in the refereed
'Food Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal.'
>
> Proposals must be in English, include a title, a 20-30 word "Short
Description" (thesis statement), a 200-300 word "Long Description"
(abstract), and can be submitted electronically through our website. For
more information regarding proposal submission requirements and to submit
your proposal, please visit the conference website at:
http://food-studies.com/conference-2012/call-for-papers/
>
> Virtual Proposals/Registrations, as well as Non-Presenter Registrations
are encouraged to submit and attend.
>
> Submission Deadlines: Deadlines will be announced on the conference
website. Papers and proposals will be reviewed within two weeks of
submission. The deadline to receive the Early Registration Discount is May
4 2012.
>
> For full submission and registration details, including an online
proposal submission form, please visit the conference website.
>
> We look forward to receiving your proposal and hope you will be able to
join us in Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA in October 2012.
>
> Wesley M. Jarrell
> Professor Emeritus
> University of Illinois
> College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences (ACES)
> Champaign, IL, USA
>
> On behalf of the Food Studies Conference
> Email: support(a)food-studies.com
>
Sylvia Nam
Doctoral Candidate
Department of City and Regional Planning
University of California, Berkeley
sylvianam(a)berkeley.edu
**************************************************************
* *
* This message was sent through the planning-announce listserv.
* To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank message to
planning-announce-leave(a)lists.berkeley.edu
*
*
**************************************************************
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Griffin, Greg <Greg.Griffin(a)campotexas.org>
Date: Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Subject: FW: Meeting Invitation: Kaiser Permanente Active Transportation
Indicators
***Greg Griffin****,** **AICP,* SENIOR PLANNER****
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
512 974 2084 | **greg.griffin(a)campotexas.org******
****P.O. Box** 1088** | ****Austin**, **TX** **78767********
*From:* Vickie Jacobsen [mailto:meetings@meetings.callinfo.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:37 PM
*To:* liz(a)chapsys.com
*Subject:* Meeting Invitation: Kaiser Permanente Active Transportation
Indicators****
** **
****
*Kaiser Permanente Active Transportation Indicators *
------------------------------
****
*Meeting Description:* ****
** **
Please join us for the Kaiser Permanente Active Transportation (AT)
Indicators Webinar. During this one-hour meeting, we**'**ll report on the
results of a four-month research and outreach effort to identify exemplary
efforts in measuring various aspects of Active Transportation. It will
include recommended indicators and monitoring techniques for three aspects
of AT: the demand for AT at both the population and user levels; the
provision and quality of AT facilities; and and how well different places
support AT. Following the Webinar, the final report: *Measuring Active
Transportation: Recommendations for Colorado* will be made available for
download. Please contact Vickie Jacobsen at Charlier Associates, Inc. (
vickie(a)charlier.org) with any questions.****
** **
****
[image: Register for Event] <https://cc.callinfo.com/r/1whbwtb60q5ca>****
****
*Details* ****
** **
*Date:* ****
Thu, Apr 19, 2012 ****
*Time:* ****
08:00 AM MDT ****
*Duration:** *****
1 hour ****
*Host(s):** *****
Vickie Jacobsen ****
****
****
** **
To opt-out of future email messages or to manage your email preferences
please click here
<https://cc.callinfo.com/optout?optOut=1jwhiwu6ahu3l&host=cbeyond>This
email was sent to: liz(a)chapsys.com by CBeyond Communications: ****320
Interstate North Parkway,Suite 300** **Atlanta**, **GA** **30339** **USA****
****
[image: Powered by CBeyond Communications] <http://www.cbeyond.net>****
****
** **
****
** **
--
Phyllis Orrick
Communications Director
Safe Transportation Research and Education
Center<http://www.safetrec.berkeley.edu>(SafeTREC)
University of California Transportation Center <http://www.uctc.net> (UCTC)
Institute for Urban and Regional Development
<http://www.iurd.berkeley.edu>(IURD)
2614 Dwight Way
UC Berkeley
Berkeley CA 94720-7374
510-643-1779
@transsafe <https://twitter.com/#!/transsafe>
@californiaUTC <https://twitter.com/#!/CaliforniaUTC>
@IURDBerkeley <https://twitter.com/#!/IURDBerkeley>
Via Streetsblog, there is a new study examining factors influencing childhood obesity. One of the things examined was built environment and neighborhood. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the study found a strong connection between the walkability of child's neighborhood and the likelihood of obesity:
Children who lived in walkable areas, with a child-friendly park nearby and access to healthy food had 59% lower odds of being obese. Kids that lived in car-dependent neighbourhoods with more fast food outlets had the highest levels of obesity (16%, which is the US average). But only 8% of children were obese in walkable areas with access to more healthy food.
The article summarizing is here: http://walkonomics.com/blog/2012/04/how-your-post-code-is-as-important-as-y…
And the study is here: http://www.seattlechildrens.org/Press-Releases/2012/Zip-Code-as-Important-a…
Erik Weber
United We Ride -- Office of Program Management
Federal Transit Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, E44-431
Washington, DC 20590
Ph: 202.366.0705
On the Web:
www.unitedweride.gov<http://www.unitedweride.gov/>
Follow the United We Ride National Resource Center:
@NRCtrans<http://twitter.com/NRCtrans>
www.fta.dot.gov<http://www.fta.dot.gov/>
Follow FTA on Twitter:
@FTA_DOT<http://twitter.com/FTA_DOT>
P Please consider the environment before printing this email.