*Apologies for cross-postings
FHWA announces the establishment of a new pooled fund program in support of
the next generation of travel behavior data collection and processing. This
program will integrate travel survey data with passive data covering both
long-distance and local travel behavior data on an annual basis. For more
details, visit the Pooled Fund Solicitation #1466 at
http://www.pooledfund.org/Details/Solicitation/1466.
FHWA Staff Contact: Wenjing Pu at <mailto:wenjing.pu@dot.gov>
wenjing.pu(a)dot.gov or 202-366-5024, Daniel Jenkins at
<mailto:Daniel.Jenkins@dot.gov> Daniel.Jenkins(a)dot.gov or 202-366-1067.
Hello CTPP!
The Census bureau has proposed criteria for geography for the 2020 census in the Federal Register. The criteria is open for comment until May 16, 2018. Click here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/02/15 and scroll to Census Bureau for the proposed criteria most relevant to you! (Census Block Groups, Census County Divisions and Equivalent Entities, Census Designated Places, and Census Tracts).
The CTPP oversight board strongly urges you to read the notices, respond as appropriate, and get involved in the Participant Statistical Areas Process (PSAP), as custom small geography in the CTPP tabulation will be discontinued after the next tab. Please see attached memo.
For info and updates visit: http://ctpp.transportation.org/Pages/Policy-Change-on-Small-Geography.aspx
Penelope Weinberger
Transportation Data Program Manager
AASHTO
This may be of interest to those on this list.
[Population Reference Bureau] Update from American Community Survey
Data Users Group
<http://acsdatacommunity.prb.org/>
*Webinar: Mapping Reliability with ACS Data*
Join us for a webinar on Mar 08, 2018 from 2:00-3:00 PM EST.
*Register now!*
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/261934844984463873
The American Community Survey (ACS) provides data users with unique
insights into the socioeconomic characteristics of local populations.
Mapping the data is one way to examine differences in characteristics
across geographic areas. However, ACS estimates are subject to sampling
variability, so reality on the ground may differ from survey results.
In this webinar, *Joel Alvarez* and *Joe Salvo* (both with the
Population Division, NYC Department of City Planning) will provide
guidance in mapping ACS data. They will also demonstrate how to produce
statistically reliable maps, using their publicly available Map
Reliability Calculator.
Their presentation will be followed by 15 minutes of Q&A. This webinar
will be recorded for those who are unable to participate in the live event.
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing
information about joining the webinar.
View System Requirements
<http://support.citrixonline.com/s/G2W/Help/SystemRequirements>
You were sent this email because an administrator sent it to all users
in the Everyone role on American Community Survey Data Users Group.
Hi CTPP’ers—
Many of you are Census-watchers.
The post below describes upcoming, 2019 changes to what’s asked on Census ACS questionnaires. (And if you don’t like it, read to the end for details on where to send your comments…)
My view: The changes described are all improvements to questions and response categories. If you’re deep involved in SCOP or CTPP subcommittee, you’ll recognize that the updating of “journey to work” modes<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-13> – specifically varieties of public transit – is what the CTPP subcommittee wanted and asked for 3 or 4 years ago. It does take Census Bureau and US OMB a few years to get thru the whole process of adding or revising the questions asked. But they’re now in the home-stretch!
Enjoy reading!
Cheers,
Todd Graham
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:49 AM
To: 'census.sdc.network.list(a)census.gov' <census.sdc.network.list(a)census.gov>
Subject: Content changes proposed for the 2019 American Community Survey — and a call for comments
Content changes proposed for the 2019 American Community Survey — and a call for comments<http://sdcclearinghouse.com/2018/01/16/content-changes-proposed-for-the-201…>
The Census Bureau periodically reviews the content of the American Community Survey (ACS). One aspect is validating that the survey continues to prioritize policy and program information needs. Beyond that, the Bureau works to assess and improve how questions are asked -- including question wording, response categories, and any instructions provided -- in order to capture the most complete and accurate information.
In a notice last month, the Bureau describes final changes proposed for the 2019 American Community Survey. The specific changes and new elements have been under consideration for three years or more. And an initial batch of recommended changes was tested through the 2016 ACS content test. The complete review and revision process is documented in section II of the Census Bureau's recent notice. (https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-21 )
For the 2019 ACS, the Bureau proposes question changes or new questions in nine sections of the survey:
· Telephone service<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-11>: a redesigned question to collect information on types of telephone service.
· Health insurance<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-12>: a new question on premiums paid and any subsidies received.
· Journey to work<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-13>: revised question wording and updating descriptions of three types of public transit.
· Weeks worked<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-14>: revised question instructions and revision of response levels.
· Class of worker<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-15>: revised question instructions, wording, and response categories.
· Industry and occupation<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-16>: revised question instructions and wording, in order to elicit better descriptions.
· Retirement income<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-17>: revised question instructions and wording, expanding scope of retirement income considered.
· Relationship to "person 1"<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-18>: new response categories to clearly distinguish opposite-sex spouses, same-sex spouses, opposite-sex partners, and same-sex partners.
· Race and Hispanic origin<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-20>: a streamlined, unified categorization is proposed.
At this time, the Census Bureau is seeking the final approvals for the 2019 American Community Survey -- and the Bureau invites public comment. Per the Federal Register notice:
"The public is invited to comment on all questions on the ACS; however, the Census Bureau is particularly interested in comments on the wording changes to the nine ACS questions... which are proposed to be changed based on the results of the 2016 ACS Content Test." (https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726/p-24 )
If you wish to comment on the ACS, now is your chance. The easiest options for providing input are:
1. emailing the Department of Commerce (PRAcomments(a)doc.gov<mailto:PRAcomments@doc.gov>), or
2. completing the "regulations.gov" online comment form that is linked to the Federal Register notice<https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-26726>. Look for the "Submit a Formal Comment" button. Please expect that the online form will limit the length of your comments.
The deadline for comments is February 12, 2018.
--Todd Graham
For the SDC Steering Committee
I am trying to compare the size of the workforce in my city, as reported by the 2012-16 ACS, to the size reported by the 2000 CTPP Part 2 Table. While I can do a straightforward comparison of figures, I'd like to evaluate the difference taking into account the 90% margin of error.
I can use 2000 Census documentation to determine how to compute MOEs for figures reported for my community's own population, households and housing stock. However, I am not sure how to approach this problem for the workforce, since the workforce is based on a sample from a larger population, perhaps county, state or national. Any suggestions are appreciated.
Cliff Cook
Clifford Cook
Senior Planning Information Manager
Cambridge Community Development Department
344 Broadway, Cambridge, MA. 02139
[cid:image001.png@01CF4355.A65408C0] <https://www.facebook.com/CDDat344> [cid:image002.jpg@01CF4357.3478C720] <https://twitter.com/cddat344> [cid:image008.jpg@01CF4357.3478C720] <http://cddat344.tumblr.com/> [cid:image010.jpg@01CF4357.3478C720] <http://instagram.com/cddat344>
www.cambridgema.gov/CDD<http://www.cambridgema.gov/CDD.aspx>
ccook(a)cambridgema.gov<mailto:ccook@cambridgema.gov>
M: 8:30-8:00 T-Th: 8:30-5:00 F: 8:30-Noon
617/349-4656
617/349-4669 FAX
617/349-4621 TTY
The Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission (MPC), which
houses the Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization has a
job opening for a *Transportation Planner*.
The primary responsibility of this position is to maintain and update the
Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Review of resumes and cover letters will begin on 1/22/2018. The position
is opened until filled.
Follow the link below for more information and job description on the MPC's
website:
<http://knoxmpc.org/employment/2017-12-29_Knoxville-Knox%20County%20Metropol…>
Transportation Planner
<http://knoxmpc.org/employment/2017-12-29_Knoxville-Knox%20County%20Metropol…>
--
Mike Conger, P.E.
Senior Transportation Engineer
Knoxville Regional TPO
400 Main St, Suite 403
Knoxville, TN 37902
Ph: 865-215-3813 <(865)%20215-3813>
What's the cure for a bitter winter day? Urban transportation
demographics, of course! The Census for Transportation Planning
Subcommittee, ABJ30(1) will be meeting on Monday, January 8 at 12:15
PM-1:15 PM in Liberty P in the Marriott Marquis. We will discuss
subcommittee business, get Census program updates, and there will be a
guest speaker. More information can be found at
http://www.trbcensus.com/TRB2018/.
I look forward to seeing you there!
--
Mara Kaminowitz, GISP
GIS Coordinator
.........................................................................
Baltimore Metropolitan Council
Offices @ McHenry Row
1500 Whetstone Way
Suite 300
Baltimore, MD 21230
410-732-0500 ext. 1030
mkaminowitz(a)baltometro.org
www.baltometro.org
Some discussion came up at our recent conference in Kansas City about
earlier days of the program when public sector employees would get data
request from folks in various private sector industries. The CTPP Board
Training & Outreach subcommittee wanted to generate an anecdotal list from
listserv members of who they know using the data--beyond more traditional
public sector transportation planners and their consultants. This could be
some non-traditional research area at a university, some more obscure
public agency use case, or a private sector application. Knowing not only
who is using it but what they're using it for is always a plus.
Feel free to reply to the listserv or me directly.
Thanks in advance!
Ben
*Ben Gruswitz, AICP *|* Senior Planner*
Office of Long-Range Planning
Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
190 N Independence Mall West, 8th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106-1520
215.238.2882 <http:/#> | bgruswitz(a)dvrpc.org <http:/#>
www.dvrpc.org