The Census Bureau will be releasing the update to the 2010 Census Summary File 1 that will include characteristics for urbanized areas on Thursday. Here's the announcement from the recent Tip Sheet:
Summary File 1 Urban/Rural Update File - Adds urban and rural population and housing unit counts to the 2010 Census Summary File 1 released in 2011. The update provides detailed tables on age, sex, households, families, relationship to householder, housing units, detailed race and Hispanic origin groups and group quarters population for each of the nation's urbanized areas and urban clusters, and for the urban and rural portions of the United States, states, counties and places. (Scheduled for release Sept. 27.)
Also for an update on the social and economic characteristics, in a conversation with ACS staff, I was told that the ACS data files will not include the new UA until the release of the 2012 ACS in Oct-Dec of 2013. We are not getting them in the 2011 ACS because ACS staff did not get the geographic boundary information in time.
Nancy Gemignani
California State Census Data Center
Demographic Research Unit
Department of Finance
915 L Street, 8th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 327-0103 ext 2550
nancy.gemignani(a)dof.ca.gov<mailto:nancy.gemignani@dof.ca.gov>
North Central Texas Council of Governments(NCTCOG) has issued an RFP for Consultant Services to perform a comprehensive review and analysis of the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) data collected in the North Central Texas Region. You can find the RFP at NCTCOG's website at the following address:
http://www.nctcog.org/rfp
Please note that the RFP closes on October 19, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. local time.
Written questions concerning the RFP should be submitted by email to TransRFPs(a)nctcog.org<mailto:TransRFPs@nctcog.org> by October 5, 2012.
____________________________________
Kathy Yu
Senior Transportation System Modeler, Travel Model Development
North Central Texas Council of Governments
P.O. Box 5888
Arlington, TX 76005-5888
Phone: (972) 896-1431
Email: kyu(a)nctcog.org<mailto:kyu@nctcog.org>
[cid:image001.jpg@01CD9801.A66A8380]<http://www.facebook.com/NCTCOGtrans> Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/NCTCOGtrans>
[cid:image002.jpg@01CD9801.A66A8380]<http://www.twitter.com/NCTCOGtrans> Follow us on Twitter<http://twitter.com/nctcogtrans>
Hi, all
FHWA and AASHTO have created CTPP profile sheets using ACS 2006-2010 and
Census 2010 data. These profiles are released at AASHTO website:
http://download.ctpp.transportation.org/profiles_2012/transport_profiles.ht…
.
The profiles are designed to give transportation planners a handy way to
examine trends by including two time points. The profiles are available
for the U.S. total; all states; all counties; and places with population
5,000 or more, based on 2010 Census counts.
The transportation profile has the following tables: Table 1 Selected
Characteristics; Total Persons, Persons in Households, Total Households,
Average Household Size, Average Household Income, Average Number of
Vehicles per Households, Percent of Persons in Poverty, Percent Minority,
Percent of Persons 65 and Over, Percent of Persons Foreign Born. Table 2
Mode to Work; Total Workers at Place of Residence, Mode to Work at Place
of Residence and at Place of Work and Table 3 Mean Travel Time by Mode to
Work.
Please use browser IE or Firefox for profiles downloading. The website is
currently not working for Google Chrome because of some Java issue.
Thanks,
Liang Long
Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
4800 Hampden Lane
Suite 800
Bethesda, MD 20814
tel 301 347 9141
fax 301 347 0101
FHWA 202-366-6971
e-mail llong(a)camsys.com
www.camsys.com
What is the latest 3-year ACS CTPP tabulation, and where can I find it? The
last one I had was 2006-08. I need to calculate commuting patterns between
Detroit and its suburbs.
Thanks,
Patty Becker
--
Patricia C. (Patty) Becker
APB Associates/Southeast Michigan Census Council (SEMCC)
28300 Franklin Rd, Southfield, MI 48034
office: 248-354-6520
home:248-355-2428
pbecker(a)umich.edu
I have a request for detailed 2010 age data by block for the population in
households (aka excluding group quarters). This data is available in SF1 and
SF2 at the tract level but not block. It has to be blocks because I need to
aggregate up to TAZ, and our TAZ's split tract and block group boundaries.
Has anyone come across this data or found a way of estimating it? Group
quarters also does not have detailed age groups so we can't just subtract.
Mara
Mara Kaminowitz, GISP
GIS Analyst
.........................................................................
Baltimore Metropolitan Council
Offices at McHenry Row
1500 Whetstone Way
Suite 300
Baltimore, MD 21230
410-732-0500 ext. 1030
<mailto:mkaminowitz@baltometro.org> mkaminowitz(a)baltometro.org
<http://www.baltometro.org/> www.baltometro.org
_____
Confidentiality Statement
This message may contain legally privileged and confidential information
that is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you
are not an intended recipient, taking any action based on the contents of
this message is strictly prohibited. Please immediately notify the sender if
you have received this message in error.
OOPS! I sent out the incorrect URL. The url I sent first was the one the IT people send to me for checking! Here is the correct link:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census_issues/ctpp/data_products/2000-2010…
Elaine
From: Murakami, Elaine (FHWA)
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:58 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: comparing Census 2000 with 2006-2010 ACS results on Journey to Work
FHWA has created CTPP profile sheets using ACS 2006-2010 and Census 2010 data (these profiles will be published in the near future). Top 30 counties and places (cities and CDPs) with highest increases in Public Transportation, Walk and Bike are extracted from the profile sheets and the lists are available in this link:
http://fhwatest.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census_issues/ctpp/data_products/2000…
We limited the list to counties and places with 2010 Census population over 50,000.
Because the ACS is a different survey, compared to the Census 2000 "long form", the results are not exactly comparable. But because trend analysis is important, we have developed these spreadsheets to give transportation planners a handy way to examine trends by including two time points and to look at the differences between Census 2000 results, and the 2006-2010 ACS.
Differences to remember:
1. The 2006-2010 ACS is the compilation of survey over 60 months, and not a "point in time" like the decennial census.
2. Because the ACS covers all 12 months of the year, areas with seasonal population shifts, e.g. snowbirds, summer homes, and universities are likely to see the more differences than in other locations and reflect both the change is time, as well as change in survey methods.
3. ACS 5-year data are approximately one-half the sample size as the Census 2000 long form, therefore the MOE are much larger.
The full list of counties and places with changes in Public Transportation, Walk and Bike can be found in Cambridge Systematics ftp site. ftp://ftp.camsys.com/clientsupport/CTPPdata/ , Username: 8305CTPP Password: 1900NJA
>From your CTPP friends: Liang Long, Cambridge Systematics who is the CTPP Technical Support staff, and
Elaine Murakami, FHWA Office of Planning
FHWA has created CTPP profile sheets using ACS 2006-2010 and Census 2010 data (these profiles will be published in the near future). Top 30 counties and places (cities and CDPs) with highest increases in Public Transportation, Walk and Bike are extracted from the profile sheets and the lists are available in this link:
http://fhwatest.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census_issues/ctpp/data_products/2000…
We limited the list to counties and places with 2010 Census population over 50,000.
Because the ACS is a different survey, compared to the Census 2000 "long form", the results are not exactly comparable. But because trend analysis is important, we have developed these spreadsheets to give transportation planners a handy way to examine trends by including two time points and to look at the differences between Census 2000 results, and the 2006-2010 ACS.
Differences to remember:
1. The 2006-2010 ACS is the compilation of survey over 60 months, and not a "point in time" like the decennial census.
2. Because the ACS covers all 12 months of the year, areas with seasonal population shifts, e.g. snowbirds, summer homes, and universities are likely to see the more differences than in other locations and reflect both the change is time, as well as change in survey methods.
3. ACS 5-year data are approximately one-half the sample size as the Census 2000 long form, therefore the MOE are much larger.
The full list of counties and places with changes in Public Transportation, Walk and Bike can be found in Cambridge Systematics ftp site. ftp://ftp.camsys.com/clientsupport/CTPPdata/ , Username: 8305CTPP Password: 1900NJA
>From your CTPP friends: Liang Long, Cambridge Systematics who is the CTPP Technical Support staff, and
Elaine Murakami, FHWA Office of Planning
So I'm once again befuddled by the way the API handles variable IDs.
I'm trying to retrieve data from table PCT20: "Group quarters population by group quarters type" from SF1. However the SF1 does not seem to follow the same variable formatting as the ACS 5-Year (it doesn't seem to use the _001E / _001M suffixes).
In the example queries, the table "P001: total population" is retrieved using the ID 'P0010001'. Based on this I would've guessed that the 0001 designates the variable within the table in the same way that _001E does. However using this same style suffix on PCT20 results in an error.
Does anyone know how these IDs are constructed? I haven't been able to find a variable list for SF1 that corresponds to this one<http://www.census.gov/developers/data/2010acs5_variables.xml>.
Thanks much,
Sam Ennis
I will be out of the office starting 08/21/2012 and will not return until
08/28/2012.
Andrew Chin will be acting Branch Chief August 21 and 22. Derek Man will be
acting Branch Chief August 23 through 27.