We are in the process of organising an International Conference in Survey Methods that will be held in Costa Rica in August, 2004. Details can be found on our new web site:
www.travelsurveyconferences.org
Please check out the web site, and also note the call for abstracts -- abstracts are due to me by July 20.
Peter Stopher
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Prof. Peter Stopher, Ph.D., FIEAust, F ASCE
Professor of Transport Planning
Institute of Transport Studies, C37
The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
AUSTRALIA
e-mail: peters(a)its.usyd.edu.au
Internet: http://www.its.usyd.edu.au
Phone: +61 (0)2 9351 0010
Fax: +61 (0)2 9351 0088
Mobile: +61 (0)438 644 430
Home address:
190 Barrenjoey Road,
Newport, NSW 2106
AUSTRALIA
e-mail: peters19(a)bigpond.net.au
Phone: +61 (0)2 9979 4496
Fax: +61 (0)2 9997 2076
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On Friday, June 27th the Oregon CTPP Part one's were mailed to the
Oregon MPOs and state DOT by the Census Bureau. Oregon was used as the
test data for the software development. It is expected that the
California CDs will be mailed Monday. In the queue are Texas, New York,
Florida and New Jersey. MPOs in these states and the state DOTs should
expect to see their data before July 11th. As more states get in the
processing queue and are completed, the CTPP Working Group will post the
information here. To answer many of your basic questions check
"Anticipating the CTPP" at
http://www.trbcensus.com/notes/ctpp_distribution.pdf
--
Ed Christopher
Planning Specialist
Resource Center
Federal Highway Administration
19900 Governors Drive
Olympia Fields, Illinois 60461
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (cell)
I'm posting this for Michael Ratcliffe, who is not a subscriber to this
listserve.
--Phil
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB has indicated that they prefer "metro area" and "micro area" as
abbreviations. They do not like "MeSA" and "MiSA."
Other acceptable abbreviations are:
CBSA for Core Based Statistical Area
CSA for Combined Statistical Area
NECTA for New England City and Town Area
CNECTA for Combined New England City and Town Area
Metro Division for Metropolitan Division
NECTA Division for New England City and Town Area Division
_____________________________
Michael R. Ratcliffe
Chief, Population Distribution Branch
Population Division
U.S. Census Bureau
301-763-2421
michael.r.ratcliffe(a)census.gov
Keith:
>mSA looks good, but wouldn't ìSA be better?
>
>Keith Goodman
I think you used a Greek leading letter, but it did not come through, so
that is one problem with that abbreviation.
Peter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Van Demark
Director of GIS Products and Training Phone: 617-527-4700
Caliper Corporation Fax: 617-527-5113
1172 Beacon Street E-mail: peter(a)caliper.com
Newton MA 02461-9926 Web site: http://www.caliper.com
Elaine and Ed:
>On Friday, the Office of Management and Budget released the list of revised
>definitions of Metropolitan Areas, and new definitions of Micropolitan and
>Combined Statistical Areas.
Are there commonly-accepted abbreviations for Metropolitan Statistical Area
and Micropolitan Statistical Area? The OMB circular did not indicate any.
MSA won't work anymore; they could be MeSA and MiSA, which are a little
cryptic, or MetroSA and MicroSA, which are a little long.
Peter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Van Demark
Director of GIS Products and Training Phone: 617-527-4700
Caliper Corporation Fax: 617-527-5113
1172 Beacon Street E-mail: peter(a)caliper.com
Newton MA 02461-9926 Web site: http://www.caliper.com
Apologies in advance for any duplicate receipts ...
-----Original Message-----
From: COPAFS(a)aol.com [mailto:COPAFS@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:54 AM
Subject: News From COPAFS:Revised Metropolitan/Micropolitan Definitions
Dear Members and Friends of COPAFS:
On Friday, the Office of Management and Budget released the list of revised
definitions of Metropolitan Areas, and new definitions of Micropolitan and
Combined Statistical Areas. The list of areas can be obtained by going to:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ Go to "Bulletins" (on the left hand side of
the page under "Information for Agencies") and then at the bottom of the
announcement, Bulletin 03-04, there is the link to the PDF Attachment.
A full text of the short press release (2003-18) can be found on the OMB web
site at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/pubpress/index.html
COPAFS will host a one day seminar on November 4, 2003, to assess the impact
of the new areas on the public and private sectors. An announcement and
registration form will be on our web site at www.copafs.org by tomorrow
afternoon.
Regards,
Ed Spar
thanks to chuck purvis who updated the trb census subcommittee calendar
page with the most current dates of the various data releases. this
page also contains links to the webpages for the products that have come
out.
http://www.TRBcensus.com/calendar.html
TO: CTPP-News; Bay Area Census Listserv
The Census Bureau has a series of "Census Brief" reports, each about 12 pages in length, in PDF format, with detailed tables, ranking of cities, and national thematic maps for all U.S. counties and states.
The most recent reports are based on "long form" sample data, including topics such as: poverty, disability, housing values, renters costs, and veterans. (The poverty brief was just issued this week.) More are yet to come.
Congratulations (of sorts) to Sunnyvale, California, for having the highest median housing values among large U.S. cities of 100,000+ population! Sunnyvale is also tied with Irvine, California, in terms of highest median gross rents.
The url is:
http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/briefs.html
**************************************************************
Charles L. Purvis, AICP
Principal Transportation Planner/Analyst
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
(510) 464-7731 (office)
(510) 464-7848 (fax)
www: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/
Census WWW: http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/
**************************************************************
here's an excepts from my brief article from 'the core of the rust belt'
(Youngstown, Ohio).
In 1970 only 700 workers from the Mahoning Valley worked in Geauga
County, now 4,000 do. Cuyahoga County drew only 668 workers from the
region in 1970 now 3,093 make this daily commute. Portage and Summit
Counties each gained 1,700 'Valley' workers over the last 30 years and
the 'Valley' commuters headed for Columbiana County doubled from 2,141
to 4,028. Pennsylvania has also become a popular place of work. About
1,900 more people go over the State line to work than did in 1970; this
is a change of 38%.
The good news is that more employable people still make the Mahoning
Valley (core of the rust belt) their home base. They pay their property
taxes here and for the most part they still shop locally.
The bad news is that more local income taxes go elsewhere. And there's
a lot more traffic out even in communities that aren't experiencing
growth.
>>> ed christopher <edc(a)berwyned.com> 06/03/03 06:25PM >>>
it would be nice to see or hear more about "who has done what" with
their county flow data. linked below is a piece i worked on focused on
the chicago area. one of the things that we here enjoy looking at, are
the flows that come into a county (imports), the ones that go out
(exports) and the ones that never leave (retains). analyzing how
these
trend overtime certainly gives one a fuller appreciation of the
dynamics
of our work travel and urban form. in 30 years we have seen the
character of an area (at the county level) change and go from a
collection of "bedroom communities" (exporter) to an area that is self
sustaining (importer and retainer) in its balance of trips. it will
be
fun to look at this in more geographic detail "if and when" we ever
get
our flow data.
http://www.berwyned.com/papers/co2cochgo.pdf
danielle.cervantes(a)uniontrib.com wrote:
> This trend has been amply written about in San Diego. I have the
CTPP
> data, and I was trained to explore it (thanks Steve and Paul!), but
I
> haven't had an opportunity yet. Generally, the "regular" Census
> releases have answered our questions. Am I missing something?