Dear Tom,
Just ask the Census Bureau Data Users Division for qualifications
to be included in the Pre-Embargo List. As I (as FSCPE and REAC
members) know, many organizations such as SDC, FSCPE, news/press
organizations, and many others are on the lists by signing a News
Release Embargo Agreement.
If you have very good reasons (representing many data users) to be
included, you should pursue. Just get to the Embargo website from the
Census Bureau's homepage and contact the person in charge.
Good luck.
________________________________
Richard Lin, Ph.D.
Demographer
Colorado Department of Local Affairs
Division of Local Government
1313 Sherman Street, Room 521
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: (303)866-4989
Fax:: (303)866-2660
richard.lin(a)state.co.us
www.DOLA.Colorado.Gov
>> "Tom Reinauer"
<treinauer(a)smrpc.org> 10/2/2006 7:35 AM >>>
I agree with Ed. This is
a problem, and I remember commenting about
it
extensively following the 2000 Census data started being released.
Perhaps there's an opportunity to collectively ask the appropriate
agency/agencies to see if there is a way that professionals can
receive
the data prior to or at the same time as the press. I have since
forgotten about how/why this embargo thing occurs, but it would save
us
a lot of time explaining and correcting things after-the- fact. --Tom
Tom Reinauer, Transportation Director
Southern Maine RPC & Kittery Area MPO
21 Bradeen St. Suite 304
Springvale, ME 04083
(207)324-2952 Ext. 18
(207)324-2958 fax
treinauer(a)smrpc.org
www.smrpc.org
-----Original Message-----
From: ed christopher [mailto:edc@berwyned.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:11 AM
To: Alan Pisarski
Cc: Srinivasan, Nanda; ctpp-news maillist; 'Murakami,Elaine';
North,Joel; Phil Salopek
Subject: Re: [CTPP] October 3 is the next scheduled release
ofACStablesincluding PLACE OF WORK!
This has always been the issue. The press gets the data early as
embargoed and then the transportation folks get torpedoed and don't
have
a chance to respond because they haven't seen the data. Case in
point.
The Atlanta Journal Constitution ran an article about one county
leading
the nation with a 51 minute travel time. Well after the story broke
Joel North from GDOT and Nandu Srinivasan used PUMs to learn the data
looked funny. There were way too many 150 minute type commutes. The
data did not make sense and with sampling things can happen. Elaine
Murakami then found out from Phil that indeed something was wrong.
The
CB had a bad coder survey taker at the front end, going through
retraining and trying to figure out how to deal with the data.. The
point however, is if the "public agency" transportation community had
the data when the press had it we may have been able to inform what
became a very misleading article.
Another point--People do need to look at the data. I have playing
with
the rank of all 775 counties that have data by their mean travel time.
American Factfinder has a lot on it.
The article can be found at (You do have to register for a fee) 51.6
MINUTES :Commute time report stumps Coweta officials
Date: September 7, 2006
http://nl.newsbank.com/nojavascript.html
Land of the long commute: Georgia is No. 1 in counties with
time-wasting
trips to work. The sprawl makes homes affordable, but the crawl drives
down the quality of life.
Date: August 31, 2006
http://nl.newsbank.com/nojavascript.html
Alan Pisarski wrote:
USA Today has the data and is planning a fairly major
play on the
release date. AEP
_____
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net
[mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net]
On Behalf Of Murakami, Elaine
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:46 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] October 3 is the next scheduled release of ACS
tablesincluding PLACE OF WORK!
How time flies! Just when you thought you were getting a handle on
the journey-to-work data from the 2005 ACS, the next round of data
will released! The next set will include Place of Work tabulations.
>From the CTPP world, these are like "CTPP
Part 2" tables, where the
tabulation is by
place-of-work, rather than place-of-residence. Since
the 2005 ACS
included
ALL counties in the sample, the place-of-work
tabulations should look
much better than the 2004 ACS place-of-work
tabulations (about
one-third of counties were included in the sample).
Don't forget:
1. 2005 ACS does not include Group Quarters population. That is,
areas with large military installations and/or college dormitories
should expect considerable differences when comparing to Census 2000
results.
2. The data are collected over all 12 months, therefore areas with
seasonal shifts are likely to see the greatest differences when
comparing to Census 2000 results.
Good luck! Nanda Srinivasan, Ed Christopher and I are trying to wrap
up our new Profile sheets using the 2005 ACS
Place-of-Residence
tables, but we have had a lot of work on calculating Margins of Error
and incorporating the results into the tables.
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460 (in Seattle)
--
Ed Christopher
FHWA Resource Center
19900 Governors Drive
Olympia Fields, Illinois 60461
708-283-3534 (v) 708-283-3501 (f)
708-574-8131 (cell)
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news