I would like to second Carol's post. Is there any chance of setting up a
"digest version" of this newsletter? I do like to scan the various posts but
some days there are quite a few...
Kevin L. Doyle, AICP
Assistant Transportation Planner
Johnson County Council of Governments
410 E. Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
319.356.5253
319.356.5217 [FAX]
TO: CTPP-News
[If and when replying to e-mail, I recommend snipping out the bulk of my message....]
Big new batch of data released this morning - - -
The Census Bureau's data file: ProfileDataUS.zip contains the "US Summary" demographic profile pages (#1 - #4) in CSV format. The file is in the following directory on the Census Bureau's site:
http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/100_and_sample_profile/0_United…
It has data for the US, states, Census regions and divisions, metropolitan areas (MSAs, PMSAs, CMSAs); American Indian and Alaskan Native reservations and Homelands; and congressional districts. IT DOESN'T HAVE DATA FOR COUNTIES OR PLACES. Of course, it has no variable name record, so you need to do some work to process this file.
I'll be in the process of uploading some of our analyses (XLS and CSV datasets) to our FTP site. Feel free to grab. New site directory is:
ftp://ftp.abag.ca.gov/pub/mtc/census2000/DP2-4/National/
**********************************************************************************
Some state-level highlights:
Yes, Michigan is #1 in drive alone share at 83.2%! (Alan, sorry, but Wyoming is 75.4% ;-)
***Top/Bottom States in Drive Alone to Work commute share:
US 75.7%
Michigan 83.2%
Alabama 83.0%
Ohio 82.8%
Indiana 81.8%
New Hampshire 81.8%
....
New York 56.3%
District of Columbia 38.4%
***Top/Bottom States in Carpool to Work commute share
US 12.2%
Hawaii 19.0%
Puerto Rico 18.0%
Alaska 15.5%
Arizona 15.4%
Mississippi 15.2%
...
New York 9.2%
Massachusetts 9.0%
***Top/Bottom States in Transit to Work commute share
District of Columbia 33.2%
New York 24.4%
New Jersey 9.6%
Massachusetts 8.7%
Illinois 8.7%
...
Arkansas 0.4%
North Dakota 0.4%
***Top/Bottom States in Walk-to-Work Commute Share
US 2.9%
District of Columbia 11.8%
Alaska 7.3%
New York 6.2%
Vermont 5.5%
Montana 5.5%
...
Tennessee 1.5%
Alabama 1.3%
***Top/Bottom States in Work-at-Home Worker Share
US 3.3%
South Dakota 6.5%
Montana 6.4%
North Dakota 6.4%
Vermont 5.7%
Oregon 5.0%
...
Mississippi 1.9%
Puerto Rico 1.8%
***States Most Like the U.S. in terms of Means of Transportation to Work
1. Virginia
2. Colorado
3. Pennsylvania
4. Washington
5. Nevada
50. Hawaii
51. New York
52. District of Columbia
*******************************************************************************
***********************************************
Charles L. Purvis, AICP
Senior Transportation Planner/Analyst
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
(510) 464-7731 (office)
(510) 464-7848 (fax)
www: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/
Census WWW: http://census.mtc.ca.gov/
***********************************************
I am very grateful to get the CTPP news from you, however, I am getting tired of getting everyone's comments who as to respond to one e-mail. Is there anyway of just getting the initial information from you and not all of the garbage that goes with it?
Carol K. Palmoski,
Lancaster County Planning Commission
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA,
palmoski(a)co.lancaster.pa.us
Chris's points about the last week of March survey period is also why the
bicycle mode is likely to be underreported. March isn't prime biking weather
in these parts, and even I only bike to work 25% of the time (unless its
bike to work week or I get the long form census survey).
Keep in mind that the 2000 Census Supplemental Survey was taken over a
year's time and will have different and maybe more realistic JTW info. I
will be comparing the 2 sources.
Don Burrell, Senior Planner
Bicycle / Pedestrian Coordinator
OKI Regional Council of Governments
801-B West Eighth St. Suite 400
Cincinnati, OH 45203-1607
513-621-6300
513-621-9325 - fax
dburrell(a)oki.org <mailto:dburrell@oki.org>
<A bicycle is an instrument for playing the road>
-----Original Message-----
From: Forinash.Christopher(a)epamail.epa.gov
[mailto:Forinash.Christopher@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:50 AM
To: dsaladino(a)swrpc.org
Cc: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] US States Rankings for Means of Transportation to
Work
Hey David and list,
Keep in mind the Census date is 4/1/2000, and the question (if I
remember correctly) asks for usual main mode to work over the past week.
That's one of the flaw's with using CTPP/JTW for much more than "hmmm"
factoids, and is clearly a reason why transit shares show up so much
lower than other observations reveal. For example, I don't take transit
to work every day, but I do so at least once a week, and sometimes for
the trip to and not from, etc.
Chris.
I would be interested to see a comparison of the rate of pedestrian
fatalities for states compared with walk-to-work share. (As a estimation of
the relative safety/suitability of an area for this sort of endeavor.) I
had heard somewhere that the rate of pedestrian fatalities was higher for
Atlanta than for New York City, despite the fact that many more people
walked in NYC.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Saladino [mailto:dsaladino@swrpc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:51 AM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] US States Rankings for Means of Transportation to
Work
It is interesting to note that 4 of the top 5 walk-to-work states are
northern (i.e. cold) states. While the bottom two are southern states. I
would have thought it would be the other way around. Any thoughts about why
this is? Income, sidewalk connectivity, climate??
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Chuck Purvis; ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
<snip>
***Top/Bottom States in Walk-to-Work Commute Share
US 2.9%
District of Columbia 11.8%
Alaska 7.3%
New York 6.2%
Vermont 5.5%
Montana 5.5%
...
Tennessee 1.5%
Alabama 1.3%
Density/land use pattern was my first thought, and I think it is a significant
contributor. But does it explain why Alaska and Montana are near the top?
Frank Miller
Senior Transportation Planner
Missouri Department of Transportation - Springfield Area District
MarkWilkes(a)thempc.org on 06/05/2002 08:10:47 AM
To: dsaladino(a)swrpc.org
cc: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net,
owner-ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net(bcc: Frank O
Miller/D8/MODOT)
Subject: RE: [CTPP] US States Rankings for Means of
Transportation to Work
Density/land use practices and climate????
Mark Wilkes, PE, AICP
Director of Transportation Planning
Chatham Urban Transportation Study
Chatham County-Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission
P.O. Box 8246, 110 East State Street
Savannah, GA 31412-8246
wilkesm(a)thempc.org
tel. (912) 651-1451 fax (912) 651-1480
"David Saladino"
<dsaladino@swrpc. To: <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net>
org> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [CTPP] US States
Rankings for Means of Transportation to
owner-ctpp-news@c Work
hrispy.net
06/05/02 08:51 AM
Please respond to
dsaladino
It is interesting to note that 4 of the top 5 walk-to-work states are
northern (i.e. cold) states. While the bottom two are southern states. I
would have thought it would be the other way around. Any thoughts about
why
this is? Income, sidewalk connectivity, climate??
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Chuck Purvis; ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
<snip>
***Top/Bottom States in Walk-to-Work Commute Share
US 2.9%
District of Columbia 11.8%
Alaska 7.3%
New York 6.2%
Vermont 5.5%
Montana 5.5%
...
Tennessee 1.5%
Alabama 1.3%
Ever walked in Texas in the dead heat of August?
C. Robert Houston
GIS Planner
City of Tyler
423 W Ferguson
Tyler, Tx. 75702
(903) 531-1175
FAX: (903) 531-1170
Density/land use practices and climate????
Mark Wilkes, PE, AICP
Director of Transportation Planning
Chatham Urban Transportation Study
Chatham County-Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission
P.O. Box 8246, 110 East State Street
Savannah, GA 31412-8246
wilkesm(a)thempc.org
tel. (912) 651-1451 fax (912) 651-1480
"David Saladino"
<dsaladino@swrpc. To: <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net>
org> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [CTPP] US States Rankings for Means of Transportation to
owner-ctpp-news@c Work
hrispy.net
06/05/02 08:51 AM
Please respond to
dsaladino
It is interesting to note that 4 of the top 5 walk-to-work states are
northern (i.e. cold) states. While the bottom two are southern states. I
would have thought it would be the other way around. Any thoughts about
why
this is? Income, sidewalk connectivity, climate??
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Chuck Purvis; ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
<snip>
***Top/Bottom States in Walk-to-Work Commute Share
US 2.9%
District of Columbia 11.8%
Alaska 7.3%
New York 6.2%
Vermont 5.5%
Montana 5.5%
...
Tennessee 1.5%
Alabama 1.3%
TO: CTPP-News
The following is the message from Nanda and Elaine. For some odd reason, their original message and it's attachments are lost in transit, so this is their message, and their 3 data/documentation files are now on our FTP site, at:
ftp://ftp.abag.ca.gov/pub/mtc/census2000/DP2-4/National/
MSA data.doc
msacomparison.xls
geography_comparison.xls
[Note: the geography_comparison.xls is VERY IMPORTANT, since the MSAs and CMSAs aren't necessarily consistent between the 1990 and 2000 Census. CLP]
****************************************************************************
FROM ELAINE MURAKAMI (FHWA), and NANDA SRINIVASAN
Attached is some analysis and data based on the 2000 Census data for 49 large MSAs (Population > 1 million). The national average for travel time was 25.5 minutes, up about 3 minutes from 22.4 minutes in 1990.
Nationally, drove alone increased from 73.2 to 75.7. Transit declined from 5.3% to 4.7%. Carpooling declined from 13.4 (1990) to 12.2 (2000).
Thank you!
Nanda Srinivasan
TO: CTPP-News
Ranking of 280 U.S. Metropolitan Areas by Commute Time, Census 2000
1. New York CMSA 34.0
2. Washington-Baltimore CMSA 31.7
3. Atlanta MSA 31.2
4. Chicago CMSA 31.0
5. San Juan (Puerto Rico) CMSA 30.8
6. San Francisco-San Jose CMSA 29.3
7. Stockton (Calif.) MSA 29.2
8. Los Angeles CMSA 29.1
9. Miami MSA 28.9
10. Houston CMSA 28.8
...
271. Casper, WY 16.7
272. Abilene, TX 16.4
273. Cheyenne, WY 16.3
274. Rochester, MN 16.3
275. Fargo, ND 16.2
276. Bismarck, ND 16.1
277. Great Falls, MT 15.9
278. Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 15.7
279.Dubuque, IA 15.5
280. Grand Forks, ND 15.1
**************************************************************************
Metro Area (All Metros) spreadsheet is available at:
ftp://ftp.abag.ca.gov/pub/mtc/census2000/DP2-4/National/
filename: Metros-dp234-set1.xls
***************************************************************************************
Message to Ed, our Moderator - - Nandu sent a 307 KB e-mail this morning that apparently didn't make it to the listserv. Nanda had me re-send it this afternoon about 2:36 PM pacific time, and my forwarded e-mail hasn't hit the listserv yet. Hopefully we haven't fouled up the listserv with these modestly size attachments!! - - Chuck, 3:06 PM pacific time.
****************************************************************************************
***********************************************
Charles L. Purvis, AICP
Senior Transportation Planner/Analyst
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
(510) 464-7731 (office)
(510) 464-7848 (fax)
www: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/
Census WWW: http://census.mtc.ca.gov/
***********************************************