Why would the census be missing the folks who--I agree--are missed in
ES202? The self-employed, public workers, etc. should still be covered
just fine in the census--as well as anyone else. Re non-response: you'd e
surprised what they can impute!
Patty Becker
At 09:18 AM 03/18/2003 -0500, you wrote:
The gap between the employment out there and what gets
reported in the
Census is a lot higher when you factor in jobs not covered by the ES202
system, both wage/salary and "self-employed" proprietors. (The 6% upward
adjustment ABAG reports to you seems low, BEA figures would indicate about
a 20% adjustment needed.) Non-response could be the biggest factor - I
imagine the Census Bureau would have a hard time "imputing" number of
workers if a household ignores all the work-related questions on the long
form.
TO: CTPP-News listserv
FR: Chuck Purvis
RE: Reconciling Total Employment and Workers-at-Work
One of the many data issues relevant to the release of the
county-to-county total worker flow data is the reconciliation of
independent estimates of employment (jobs) with the Census 2000
workers-at-work data. My executive director saw a recent article in the
Los Angeles Times about the mismatch between census data and employment
and labor force data, and was concerned if this is an issue in our region.
My short answer to my ED was, no, the data problems faced in New York and
Los Angeles are not that serious in the Bay Area. I also provided him the
"long answer" which may prove useful to other metro areas interested in
reconciling different data sets.
The bottom line is that estimates of TOTAL EMPLOYMENT (i.e., jobs at area
of work) SHOULD BE about 7 to 9 percent HIGHER than Census 2000 estimates
of workers-at-work (i.e., workers at area of work). It is important to
understand that there are important definitional differences between total
employment and decennial census-based workers-at-work.
Our indepedent estimate of total employment, year 2000, is 3,753,700 total
jobs; Census 2000 data on workers-at-work is 3,396,800. This shows that
our total employment, unadjusted, is 10.5 percent higher than our
census-based workers-at-work. This is a really big difference! AFTER
ADJUSTMENTS, the difference between our total employment (adjusted) and
census-based workers-at-work is 1.1 percent.
There are three main ADJUSTMENTS that are needed to make TOTAL EMPLOYMENT
data comparable to census workers-at-work data:
1. Seasonal fluctuations in employment adjustments;
2. Multiple jobholding adjustments; and
3. Weekly absenteeism adjustments.
Sam Granato
Ohio DOT, Office of Technical Services
1980 W. Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43223
Phone: 614-644-6796, Fax: 614-752-8646
"It is a fine line between insight and idiocy." Greg Lebedev
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia C. (Patty) Becker 248/354-6520
APB Associates/SEMCC FAX 248/354-6645
28300 Franklin Road Home 248/355-2428
Southfield, MI 48034 pbecker(a)umich.edu