The mistake on the 1990 figure for the San Fran metro area I consider a
minor problem compared to one-sided stories (depending on the intent of a
particular article) or the misinterpretation and/or misunderstanding of the
data.
Wait until local and national newspapers start delving into more detailed
statistics. I suspect that even with careful explanation from planners, it
will often be twisted and hardly helpful.
Content because my baseball team is 35-15.
Tom Reinauer, Transportation Director
Southern Maine RPC
21 Bradeen St. Suite 304
Springvale, ME 04083
(207)324-2952
FAX -2958
treinauer(a)server.eddmaine.org
www.smrpc.maine.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Purvis" <CPurvis(a)mtc.ca.gov>
To: <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:21 PM
Subject: [CTPP] USA Today article on drive alone commute (long post)
TO: CTPP-News
Here's the link to today's USA Today article on driving alone in America.
Of course, the Census Bureau hasn't yet released data for nine states and
Puerto Rico (which are due out next week.) My bet is that Michigan (data not
yet released) is still the #1 state in terms of drive alone share of total
commute!
http://www.usatoday.com/money/covers/2002-05-30-driving-alone.htm
By the way, my old web site has 1990 data on state-level commute-to-work
shares,
at:
"Damn
Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians
and Activists" by Joel Best, UC Press, 2001. Recommended reading. Excellent
for critical thinking about the statistics that media and others use.
Which brings me to my point about lies and statistics in the USA Today
article.
I'll try to be brief.
1. USA Today states that the drive alone commute share in the San
Francisco metro
area declined from 73 percent in 1990 to 68 percent in 2000.
The 2000 figure is accurate at 68.0 percent. On the other hand, our 1990
drive alone commute share was 68.2 percent. So, our overall drive alone
commute share declined from 68.2 percent to 68.0 percent. (This is nice, but
not "wow"!)
2. USA Today claims that "Many transportation officials, planners and
environmentalists have concluded that carpooling lanes don't help reduce
traffic." Well, this is pretty shaky journalism. Like, who or what's the
source of this information? Alan, is this from you? You're cited in the next
paragraph!
I will agree that the USA Today article is entertaining, though the
blending of
factual information with anecdotal commutes is getting to be
tiring.
Some more quips and quotes from the USA Today article:
1. "Forty minutes in the car may be the equivalent of the bubble bath"
2. "There is more to life than quality time in your car, no matter how
great
your sound system is"
3. "The car is often the last refuge of
smokers....California law
prohibits all smoking in workplaces, including offices,
stores and
restaurants." (Note that California prohibits smoking in bars, as well.
However, we do allow you to smoke inside your own home, even in your own
bubble bath!)
4. "Consumers of audio books listen to them on
average 4.4 hours a week in
their cars, compared with 1.1 hours on mass transit,
according to the Audio
Publishers Association." (Gotta wonder who's answering these surveys!)
On the plus side, the USA Today's graphics are pretty darned good.
Chuck Purvis
Cranky Because My Baseball Team is 24-27.
***********************************************
Charles L. Purvis, AICP
Senior Transportation Planner/Analyst
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
(510) 464-7731 (office)
(510) 464-7848 (fax)
www:
http://www.mtc.ca.gov/
Census WWW:
http://census.mtc.ca.gov/
***********************************************