My apologies for a inference based on recent news plus an April 1 check of
the "scoreboard" which showed your state far behind not only the national
average but also the other confederate states. A more recent check
indicates this gap is now mostly erased. Is that bad news?
This'll teach me to try catching up to my e-mail on weekends - not only am I
even more unprofessional than usual then, but quite forgetful i.e. I
completely forgot that the j-to-work question is used for the formal
definition of MSA's. But beyond that it does concern me a bit that the
Census web site cited in other responses seems to have more "assists in" and
"used by" than specific Congressional directives tied to specific Census
questions. The former is something all us planner types understand, but not
by most of the people we serve. (That is not intended to demean the hard
work that Ed Christopher and others have put in keeping transportation
visible in the long form - perhaps if I were in a larger metro area and/or
CAAA non-compliant I would understand much better the needs.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Wilkinson [SMTP:JDWilkin@grpc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:52 AM
To: Granato, Sam
Subject: Re: [CTPP] Experimental Census Forms
Sam Granato:
My senator IS majority leader. Was your remark intended
to stigmatize us Mississippians as even more lacking in desire
to fill out questionnaires than the average American? If it was,
wouldn't that really make us more American than the homogenized
variety? The truth is that there is still some resistance to the idea
of collaboration 130-plus years into the occupation.
>