____________________________ Forward Header ________________________________
Subject: 2000 CTPP TAZ-UP
Author: Don Burrell <DBURRELL(a)oki.org> at SMTP-GATEWAY Date: 11/25/98
5:12 PM
The Journey-to-work and FHWA folks are currently working on
a program to prepare the CTPP TAZ geography in advance of the census,
specifically by next summer. This is to be done using a program called
TAZ-UP, TIGER/Line 99 and ArcView GIS software.
Today, I shipped the results of the 2000 Census Statistical Areas Review
process for 2 of the Cincinnati area counties to the Detroit regional
office. This work, which is underway throughout the country, has identified
census tract and block group boundary changes to be used for the 2000
census.
Having just now put 2 + 2 together, my question is whether or not the Bureau
will have our new local recommendations for census boundary changes in the
TIGER/Line 99 file that is to be shipped to us for the TAZ-UP work? OKI
plans to revise many of our TAZ boundaries to conform to the 2000 census
geography. It would be helpful to have the 2000 census geography shown.
Don Burrell
OH-KY-IN Regional Council of Govmts.
____________________________________________________________________________
Response from P. Salopek
Don:
I could not answer this question on my own, so I spoke with Bob LaMacchia in
Geography Division of the Census Bureau. The first point is that for the
TAZ-UP program, TIGER/Line 98 will be the base, not T/L 99. T/L 98 will NOT
include the local recommendations for block boundaries that you just
submitted. Bob L. says that the verification phase for both programs will
occur at the same time. This means that the T/L 99 that I guess
participants in both activities will receive to review will contain both the
new TAZ boundaries and the new block boundaries (collection blocks, not
tabulation blocks). One point to remember is that in defining TAZs for 2000
you will not be constrained to build them from blocks, since blocks won't be
defined yet. You will in fact have a wider array of lines/features to use
as TAZ boundaries than has been available in the past. We think this is an
improvement and should allow closer approximation to true TAZ boundaries.
--Phil