Hi Megan -- thanks for note re: B17005 not available at BG level.
I found Appendix E that shows which tables do or do not have a BG
tabulation.
When we reviewed this list early on, we focused on the "B08xxx" tables
for journey to work.
http://www2.census.gov/acs2009_5yr/summaryfile/ACS_2005-2009_SF_Tech_Doc
.pdf
The 5-year CTPP (2006-2010 ACS records) will include a table of sex by
employment status. The current table number (in the 3-year CTPP) is
11205. The smallest geographic unit depends on the selection by the MPO
or State DOT, with the default being census tract, and many MPOs
currently delineating TAZs (often similar in size to a block group).
There are a few tables in the CTPP using "poverty", but most of them are
tables with households as the universe (not persons).
However, the 5-year CTPP is not expected to be done until early 2013.
Elaine
-----Original Message-----
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net
[mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cogburn, Megan S
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:52 AM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] [ctpp-news] Demographic Analysis for BlockGroups
-Decennial Census vs. ACS 5 Year Estimates
Everyone has raised valid points in that ACS 5 Year Estimates are only
samples and have a high margin of error. However, with ACS replacing the
long form, there seems to be no other option for block group analyses.
Am I right here?
Elaine - B17005 is not available at the block group level, at least from
what I've found. I used the Summary File Retrieval Tool which is an
Excel macro and was unable to obtain block group data for B17005 for any
North Carolina county. This is of particular concern, which raised my
question of where to get this data (along with a few other variables)
since it appears NOT to be available at the block group level.
-----Original Message-----
From: Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov [mailto:Elaine.Murakami@dot.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:58 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] [ctpp-news] Demographic Analysis for Block Groups
-Decennial Census vs. ACS 5 Year Estimates
1. Multi-year accumulations instead of "point-in-time" data collection.
I am guessing that Megan is concerned that the ACS requires multiple
years (actually 60 months of survey data) before tabulation for small
geography. Yes, with the implementation of the ACS, the Census Bureau
made a big trade off for currency of large geographic reporting (annual
for areas with 65,000 population or more), and a long period of
collection for small area (tracts and block groups). When so many
things are volatile, like gasoline prices, housing prices, and
unemployment, it makes the 5-year accumulation problematic.
For example, when gasoline prices rose to over $4/gallon in 2008, travel
mode to work did change somewhat, with more people using transit.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_ho
me_page.html (I know, because my bus ride became very crowded! But now
that prices are heading that high again, maybe because it has been more
gradual and not a spike, I don't see increased demand on my bus).
I have heard some people say that they would prefer to go back to a
point-in-time estimate, but I don't think that it is realistic to think
that the decennial "long form" will come back.
2. B17005 : Poverty by Sex by Employment Status IS in the ACS 5-year
data, Summary File format only.
3. Cautions with using LEHD OTM. As with every dataset, the more you
know about it, the better off you are. LEHD OTM includes workers who
are covered by unemployment insurance, and excludes self-employed
(approx 10% of workers). Currently, federal workers including military
are not included, and also state workers and school district employees
have often found to be mis-located, particularly to state capitols (for
state workers), and school district headquarters for school employees.
Also, it is important to understand that the link between home and work
location is the result of a data synthesis process to assign workers to
a home location using a distribution algorithm based on records from
Minnesota, because in Minnesota, employers are required to report the
actual work location.
In an LEHD OTM webinar held last year, Robert McHaney discussed a
parking study in Austin.
http://lehd.did.census.gov/led/library/webinars.html
They looked at blocks that were outliers for employment densities, and
found a regional post office and a school district headquarters. After
removing these 2 blocks the total employment in the study area was
reduced from 60,000 to 30,000.
4. I am interested in using alternative approaches to capture
origin-destination patterns, particularly things like cell phone
tracking, RFID tags, stand-alone GPS (not personal cell phone),
BlueTooth tracking, etc. I co-chair a New Technology subcommittee of
the TRB Travel Survey Methods committee (ABJ40), where we often discuss
these topics.
http://www.travelsurveymethods.org/Tech.asp
Elaine
-----Original Message-----
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net
[mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cogburn, Megan S
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:58 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] [ctpp-news] Demographic Analysis for Block Groups
-Decennial Census vs. ACS 5 Year Estimates
My name is Megan Cogburn and I am a Community Planner with the North
Carolina Department of Transportation. My group is a part of the Project
Development and Environmental Analysis branch and we are responsible for
completing all of the NEPA documentation for bridge and highway projects
statewide. Specifically, we prepare technical reports assessing
potential project impacts on the human environment from the local/urban
planning perspective.
We currently use decennial Census data for our demographic analyses,
however we are thinking of switching to use American Community Survey
data to make our reports more current and since the American Community
Survey has now replaced the traditional decennial Census long-form.
However, it has come to our attention that ACS data is only available at
the block group level for 5 Year Estimates (and not annually). Moreover,
certain tables that were available for the 2000 Census are not available
in the ACS 5 Year Estimates (such as household type by relationship, sex
by employment status, and poverty status). Another glaring issue is that
ACS 5 Year Estimates were just released in 2010, so there is no previous
data to make historical comparisons.
So, my question for the listserv is how other organizations are moving
forward given the discrepancies between the two datasets. My group is
trying to figure out where to get missing data, how to make historical
comparisons, and also the best way to retrieve ACS 5-Year Estimates. A
huge drawback for us is that we use block group data for multiple
variables and this is only available for the 5 year estimates. In order
to retrieve summary file data for block groups you have to use an Excel
macro retrieval file that takes an extremely long time, download a
massive file from their FTP site, or use the not so user friendly Data
Ferret platform.
Please advise!
Megan Cogburn, MCRP
Community Planner | Human Environment Unit NCDOT Project Development &
Environmental Analysis
e: mscogburn(a)ncdot.gov
p: (919) 707-6062
f: (919) 212-5785
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news