Sorry to be a crank and perhaps it is because I am personally sandwiched
between these two generations and sick of hearing about them both...
Interesting statistics but why compare an older age group with a younger
age group and then place a generational label. I am afraid that,
without some context, folks are going to make conclusions that might be
more about age differences (an age group at the height of their career
vs. an age group at the beginning)? Generational (cohort) comparisons
would be more appropriate if you could compare the Baby boom when they
were young to the millenials at the same age. Not saying there are not
differences but I am afraid that these side by side comparisons would
lead some (the press) to draw conclusions that are beyond what can be
told from the data.
Michael E. Cline, PhD
Associate Director
Hobby Center for the Study of Texas
Rice University
5615 Kirby Dr
Ste 840
Houston, TX 77005
713-348-5396
Mailing Address:
6100 Main St,MS-202
Houston, TX 77005
http://hobbycenter.rice.edu
http://thetexaschallenge.com
On 8/13/2015 1:46 PM, Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov wrote:
In case you haven’t seen these, we posted new profile sheets that use
the 2006-2008 ACS and the 2011-2013 ACS Public Use Microdata Sample.
In these profiles, Baby Boomers are defined as those born between 1946
and 1964, and Millennials are defined as those born between 1983 and
2000.
For the 2006-2008 ACS, many of the Millennials were not yet of working
age.
The geography is limited only to those Counties for which PUMA
geography has matching boundaries.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census_issues/american_community_survey/pr…
I have seen some recent forecasts about declining gasoline prices, so
we will see how this impacts the mode to work and auto ownership for
younger workers in the near future.
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460 (in Seattle)
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news