Hi, everyone -
I am working on a sub-area analysis and ran into some problems. I wonder if
you happen to have similar experiences and would share your
suggestions/comments.
Our travel forecast model covers more than 50 towns in our region and has
1174 TAZs.
The sub-area analysis focuses on an area of 2 towns. The current 25 traffic
analysis zones in these 2 towns will be expanded to 67 zones for a more
sensitive highway alternative analysis. The total number of model zones will
increase from 1174 to 1216.
The sub-area analysis is in the traffic assignment step only. The plan is to
borrow the trip matrices from the first 3 steps of the model and to expand
the trip matrices from 1174*1174 to 1216*1216, so that the matrices can be
used in traffic assignment.
A highway layer with the expanded zone system is available. It has 1216
centroids.
A network will be created which has the following link attributes:
Link id,
Link direction,
Link mode,
Link speed and capacity,
Link free flow time, and
Alpha and beta value for the BPR equation.
Traffic assignment will be run from the tool menu using:
The network *.net (1216 zones)
The highway layer (1216 zones)
The trip matrix (1216*1216)
The link traffic volumes generated from this assignment step is very
different compared to the original model link volumes. I wonder if the
additional centroid connectors in the highway network caused this problem.
Any thoughts?
Your input will be appreciated.
Hua Tan
Transportation Engineer
Capitol Region Council of Governments
241 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Phone: 860-522-2217 * 21
Fax: 860-724-1274
www.crcog.org