thanks jeff for the info. i am sure many on the list will find it
interesting. i especially liked the part about the confidentiality
thresholds--especially since there is no hard evidence of how one can
disclose an individual other than some assertions by census staff.
Subject: Re: [CTPP] Re: Geographic coverage, C2SS & ACS
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:03:52 EST
From: StarkRPC(a)aol.com
To: edc(a)berwyned.com
Mr. Christopher,
I had the opportunity to attend one of the 12 regional census press
conferences concerning C2SS and ACS held Nov. 14th and 15th around the
county. Due to the embargoed nature of the data and some of the briefing
materials I waited until today to send this. If you feel this
information is
useful to the list-serve, please post it.
Officials did confirm that "small geographic areas" are indeed census
tracts.
It will probably take the full four year cycle (2004-2008) to produce
this
level of geography. I also asked whether or not BG' s or TAZ's would
be a possibility in the future. The response was that the Census Bureau
would
"most likely" continue to support the planning community with special
tabulations, with the added disclaimer "if confidentiality thresholds
are
met." Considering the size of the sample and also the size of many
TAZ's I
wonder what our chances are.
The press conference seemed to have the tone of a pitch for
Congressional
funding. If funded ($137 million/year) data for areas less than 20,000
won't
be available until 2008. It seems to me at least that it will be a
stretch
to get BG or TAZ level data for 2010. Many major newspapers have
stories on the release of C2SS today. Read a couple to get a feel for
what others think. My comments can be found in the local section of
www.cantonrep.com.
Jeff Dotson, Sr. Planner
Stark County Regional Planning Commission/
Area Transportation Study
(330) 451-7402
starkrpc(a)aol.com
www.starkrpc.org