I got this note and thought it was very relavant to the statewide taz
discussion.
Simons, Chris wrote:
Please add me to your mailing list for future CTPP
information &
correspondence. Thanks!
I am Georgia DOT's primary travel demand modeler. Can I ask who you are and
how you are involved with upcoming CTPP data structures and tools? I've got a
few enhancements I'd like to convey if you will be having input into the 2000
CTPP.
I got a copy of your recent message about polling states regarding the need
for statewide TAZs. I would comment that having some sort of TAZ structure
for states could prove useful. In Georgia, census tracts or counties could
serve as TAZs for statewide level models & analysis. I would note that some
states have very large counties, so counties may not sufficiently subdivide
the state for some types of analysis. If there were more levels of analysis
available in the CTPP (i.e., census tracts or block groups) and the polygons
could be exported in a GIS format, users could create their own TAZs. For
metropolitan areas, I would like to be able to query and export information,
preferable as ArcView shape files, at the county, census tract, and census
block group levels in addition to those available in the 1990 CTPP.