2 Jul
2012
2 Jul
'12
4:13 p.m.
The bottom line here is that the Census Bureau has abandoned its
previous methods for calculating the subcounty estimates. For 2011,
they basically carried the county % change in household population
down to the sub-county units (MCDs and places), apparently holding
the GQ pop count the same as the 2010 count (most of the time).
In my personal view, coming from a strong MCD state, it would have
been better if they had just not done 2011 estimates at all.
Patty Becker
At 08:57 AM 7/2/2012, Ed Christopher wrote:
This is an interesting article Wendell Cox sent me from
a friend of
friend. We all remember when the Census Bureau changed from using
county based estimates to using sub-county estimates in 2009 which are
then used to factor and weight the ACS. I had thought the process of
going from a county to a sub-county was a little more sophisticated but
maybe its not.
http://www.urbanophile.com/2012/06/30/misreferencing-misoverestimated-popul…
--
Ed Christopher
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (cell)
FHWA RC-TST-PLN
4749 Lincoln Mall Drive, Suite 600
Matteson, IL 60443
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
http://ryoko.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia C. (Patty) Becker 248/354-6520
APB Associates/SEMCC FAX 248/354-6645
28300 Franklin Road Home 248/355-2428
Southfield, MI 48034 pbecker(a)umich.edu