September 22, 1998
From: Keri Monihan <kmonihan(a)ccmc.org>
Senate Committee Hears from Census Director Nominee
Bureau Operating under Temporary Funding Measure
As Congress Tries to Complete Work on FY99 Bills
The Senate committee with oversight responsibility for the
census held a hearing last week to consider President
Clinton's nominee for Census Bureau director. After an
introduction by Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY), Dr.
Kenneth Prewitt received a cordial welcome from committee
Chairman Fred Thompson (R-TN) and ranking minority member
Sen. John Glenn (D-OH). Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) also
listened to Dr. Prewitt's brief prepared statement and
joined in the questioning. The Committee on Governmental
Affairs has scheduled a business meeting for September 24
and may vote on the Prewitt nomination at that time.
Dr. Prewitt told the committee that he had not yet visited
the Census Bureau and could not comment specifically on
elements of the 2000 census plan. In written responses to
questions submitted earlier by the committee, the nominee
cited four primary responsibilities for the Bureau's
director: management, constituency relations, planning and
professional standard-setting. At the hearing, he said the
success of the census must be judged not only by its
numerical accuracy but by whether the public has confidence
in the process and results.
Sen. Thompson emphasized the importance of "formidable
management skills and a vision for the future" for the next
director. The chairman did not press Dr. Prewitt for a firm
position on the use of sampling methods in the census but
instead sought a pledge that the nominee would speak openly
if he concluded that the Bureau's plan was technically
unsound or operationally unfeasible.
Census Bureau operating under temporary funding bill: Late
last week, Congress approved a continuing funding resolution
to keep government agencies running past the end of the
fiscal year on September 30 while legislators continue to
work out final agreements on most of the 13 regular
appropriations bills. While most agencies must operate at
current spending levels, the temporary funding measure,
which runs through October 9, allows the Bureau to spend at
a higher rate set for decennial activities in the
House-passed Commerce appropriations bill. The House
allocation of $952 million is $104 million more than the
Administration had requested for Census 2000 activities in
fiscal year 1999. The additional funds are for the Bureau
to prepare for a census without sampling methods.
The Commerce Department said the temporary spending
allowance was enough to keep decennial census preparations
running on schedule in October but cautioned that 2000
census preparations would require three times the amount
allotted in the temporary bill in November.
House panel continues to focus on sampling methods: The
House Subcommittee on the Census held a hearing on September
17 to review the Integrated Coverage Measurement (ICM)
component of the Census Bureau's 2000 census plan. The ICM
includes a quality-check sample survey of 750,000 households
designed to measure under- and overcounts in the initial
enumeration for various demographic subgroups and adjust the
numbers accordingly to produce a final count.
Majority (Republican) members of the panel invited five
statisticians to testify: Dr. Leo Breiman (University of
California at Berkeley); Dr. Lawrence Brown (University of
Pennsylvania); Dr. Robert Koyak (Naval Postgraduate School);
Dr. Martin Wells (Cornell University); and Dr. Donald
Ylvisaker (UCLA). In general, the group believed that a
post-census survey to gauge the accuracy of the initial
count could add more mistakes into the census because it
involved difficult matching and statistical procedures. Dr.
Brown concluded that the ICM procedure would worsen the
distribution of population among states and other areas,
which he said was more important than achieving more
accurate population totals. Dr. Breiman said that mistakes
in conducting the quality-check survey were magnified when
applied to the larger population. The five witnesses did
not discuss any specific alternative methods to reduce the
undercount of minorities and the poor.
The subcommittee's minority (Democratic) members were
allowed to choose three additional witnesses: Dr. Barbara
Everitt Bryant, Census Bureau director in the Bush
Administration; Dr. Eugene Ericksen (Temple University); and
Dr. Stephen Fienberg (Carnegie Mellon University). Dr.
Bryant said that unless the Supreme Court overturns the
recent federal court ruling that sampling cannot be used to
supplement a direct headcount, the prohibition "virtually
guarantees [an] undercount" in the 2000 census. She told
the panel that the 2000 census plan "[was] not a scheme
conceived by the present Administration," but was based on
evaluations of the 1990 count and research both within the
Bureau and by independent experts.
Dr. Fienberg said it was a "myth" that the 1990 census was
98.4 percent accurate because evaluations revealed as many
as 25 million counting mistakes, a ten percent gross error
rate. Dr. Ericksen disagreed with the earlier criticism of
the ICM process, saying that changes in the post-census
survey planned for 2000 should reduce matching and
estimation problems associated with the 1990 statistical
process.
Census Monitoring Board activities: The meeting of the
Census Monitoring Board originally scheduled for September
18 was postponed. The Board has not yet announced a new
date for the meeting.
Questions about the information contained in this News Alert
may be directed to TerriAnn Lowenthal at (202) 484-2270 or,
by e-mail at <terriann2k(a)aol.com>om>. Please direct all
requests to receive News Alerts, and all changes in
address/phone/fax/e-mail, to Census 2000 Initiative at
<census2000(a)ccmc.org> or 202/326-8700. Please feel free to
circulate this information to colleagues and other
interested individuals.