Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:45:38 -0400
From: Keri Monihan <kmonihan(a)ccmc.org>
Senate Committee Hears Dress Rehearsal Report From GAO
House Members Fire First Salvos in Debate Over Census
Funding
In testimony yesterday before a Senate committee, the U.S.
General Accounting Office (GAO) gave the 2000 Census Dress
Rehearsal a mixed report card, citing some successes and
some challenges that the Bureau must address before the
actual count 18 months from now. Similarly, committee
members were divided in their assessment of the Census
Bureau's ability to take an accurate count using only
conventional methods or supplementing those methods with
scientific ones.
GAO told members of the Committee on Governmental Affairs
that staffing efforts and the pace of field operations were
two early successes in the dry run. The Bureau had a
lower-than-expected turnover rate among census takers and
completed the door-to-door follow-up visits on or ahead of
schedule in all three sites. GAO cautioned, however, that
the successful recruitment and hiring in the dress rehearsal
didn't mean that the Bureau had "licked the problem for
2000," given the magnitude of the actual census compared to
the test run.
GAO warned that the Bureau "still faces major obstacles to a
cost-effective census." The congressional auditors cited
the following as its primary concerns: incomplete address
lists and maps, low (though not unexpected) mail response
rates, glitches with new data capture equipment, and the
limited success of partnerships with local governments and
community-based organizations. GAO encouraged the Bureau to
reconsider its decision not to send a second questionnaire
to all households, noting that the replacement form had
boosted mail response rates in the dry run by seven percent.
Chairman Fred Thompson (R-TN) compared the status of census
preparations to rail transportation, saying: "The train is
on schedule but we're still not sure it's going to get
there." The chairman also expressed concern that the use
of sampling to supplement the direct counting effort put the
census "in uncharted territory." He suggested that the
Commerce Department's positive assessment of the dress
rehearsal "did not square" with GAO's report of continuing
problems.
Senator John Glenn (D-OH), the panel's senior Democrat,
asked the GAO if conventional methods had "exhausted the[ir]
potential" to count the population accurately. GAO
concurred, saying that (constitutional and legal questions
aside) they still believed that sampling is an appropriate
tool to improve accuracy. "On average," GAO said, the
Bureau's 2000 census design would improve the accuracy of
the population figures for areas as small as census tracts,
which include about 4,000 people. The auditors emphasized
that implementation of the scientific methods still
presented "enormous challenges," but withheld judgment of
those operations because they were ongoing in the dress
rehearsal. Critics of sampling have claimed that the methods
would make the census counts less accurate in all places
with a population of less than 100,000.
Census 2000 funding: The controversy over the proposed use
of scientific methods in the census erupted with full force
again as the House of Representatives took its initial step
toward consideration of the Census Bureau's funding for
Fiscal Year 1999 (FY99). On July 30, the House approved by
voice vote the "rule" that governs the terms of debate for
the Commerce, Justice, State and The Judiciary
Appropriations bill. The rule grants two hours of debate,
evenly divided between proponents and opponents, on an
amendment to be offered by Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV) which
would lift the funding restriction on the 2000 census
account. The bill (H.R. 4276) allocates $952 million for
census preparations but only allows the Census Bureau to
spend half of that amount until the dispute over the use of
sampling is resolved next March. The House is expected to
consider the Commerce appropriations bill early next week.
During debate on the rule, critics of the Bureau's plan
compared the proposed use of sampling to polling while
supporters of the plan argued that conventional methods
alone would miss millions of Americans again. Rep. Mollohan
emphasized that the Bureau's plan had been reviewed and
endorsed by three expert panels convened by the National
Academy of Sciences. Rep. Dan Miller (R-FL), chair of the
census oversight subcommittee, responded that the Academy
was "not beyond politics and sadly, I think, they've been
used." Rep. Miller also charged that Dr. Charles Schultze,
who headed one of the Academy panels, was a "Democratic
political operative." Dr. Schultze served in the Johnson
and Carter Administrations and is a former chair of the
Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic
Advisors.
Rep. Harold Rogers (R-KY), who heads the Commerce funding
subcommittee, said that he only opposed the use of sampling
methods to produce the counts used for congressional
reapportionment and redistricting and did not object to the
use of data derived partially through scientific methods for
the allocation of Federal program funds.
Census Monitoring Board: The new Census Monitoring Board
will meet on August 5 in Columbia, South Carolina, one of
the three Census Dress Rehearsal sites, to continue its
oversight of 2000 census preparations. The location, time
and format of the meeting have not been announced.
Questions about the information contained in this News Alert
may be directed to TerriAnn Lowenthal at (202) 484-2270 or,
by e-mail at <terriann2k(a)aol.com>om>. Please direct all
requests to receive News Alerts, and all changes in
address/phone/fax/e-mail, to Keri Monihan at
<kmonihan(a)ccmc.org> or 202/326-8728. Please feel free to
circulate this information to colleagues and other
interested individuals.