For MT, maybe farmers contribute.
My guess for AK is that the development pattern might be the reason. I mean
very restrictive natural environment causes more compact residential
developments close to work place.
Shinwon
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net [mailto:owner-ctpp-news@chrispy.net]On
Behalf Of Don Burrell
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:32 AM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] US States Rankings for Means of Transportation to
Work
My $0.02:
I think the main influence is urban density which would apply to D.C., N.Y.,
and VT. I am surprised that AK and MT are so high but I have heard also that
in agricultural areas, that farmers report 'walking to work' on their own
farm property rather than 'working at home'. That's still far fetched for
these 2 states. I'll watch the other responses.
Don Burrell, Senior Planner
Bicycle / Pedestrian Coordinator
OKI Regional Council of Governments
801-B West Eighth St. Suite 400
Cincinnati, OH 45203-1607
513-621-6300
513-621-9325 - fax
dburrell(a)oki.org <mailto:dburrell@oki.org>
<A bicycle is an instrument for playing the road>
-----Original Message-----
From: David Saladino [mailto:dsaladino@swrpc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:51 AM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] US States Rankings for Means of Transportation to
Work
It is interesting to note that 4 of the top 5 walk-to-work states are
northern (i.e. cold) states. While the bottom two are southern states. I
would have thought it would be the other way around. Any thoughts about why
this is? Income, sidewalk connectivity, climate??
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Chuck Purvis; ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
<snip>
***Top/Bottom States in Walk-to-Work Commute Share
US 2.9%
District of Columbia 11.8%
Alaska 7.3%
New York 6.2%
Vermont 5.5%
Montana 5.5%
...
Tennessee 1.5%
Alabama 1.3%