Did anyone notice on last week's announcement of the release of SF2 (combined LF and
SF data) that the "rule of 100" applies? So, even though the
"population-/minority count-pony" has long since passed through the paddock gate
and is out in the far pasture growing fat on sweet grasses (down to the block level!), the
outlook for the long-form data, such as income and poverty (for Environmental Justice
concerns), looks a bit grim.
Are other groups outside of transportation, such as health, human services, or education,
voicing any concerns about losing the fine geo-level information?
Liz Hartmann
Rsearcher, Office of Investment Management
Minnesota Department of Transportation
>> ed christopher <edc(a)berwyned.com>
01/21/02 15:15 PM >>>
The death knell is sounding for the Census
Bureau's long form. Attached
is a notice that appeared last week in the Federal Register. It is
seeking comments by March 18, 2002 on the execution of the long. Read
it carefully and comment appropriately. Note that there is no mention
of TAZ level data. The original notice can be found on the Government
Printing Office Website at
http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a020116c.html
Once at this page just slide down to the "Census Bureau" heading.
ed christopher
fhwa-midwestern resource center
708-283-3534