Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents

1990 CTPP Part 7 at tract level! I did not remember that. I had Brian Gardner look for the CDs in my cubicle at USDOT Navy Yard. JJ Zang will pick them up in the later part of next week (after the TRB Planning applications conference) and make a copy for Chuck. There are 4 CDs and until we look at them, we will not know if all the states are included. Elaine p.s. Bob Paddock of Met Council found the 1980 UTPP file layouts and will be sending them to me! So, now we can write SAS code to read in the flat ASCII files. -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Ed Christopher Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:30 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents Chuck- I wonder if the 1990 CTPP part 7 will help. It had tracts at the workplace but I am not sure if it covered the the whole state. And then finding it is another issue. Here is what i found to atleast shed some light on part 7, see page 188. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/1995/cp4/cp4.pdf. I could not find any of my 1990 transview versions of the data. I know I have a complete set minus one state somewhere. If you can find one of the CDs even though you can not extract the data without the extraction software look on it to see if there are any PDF files with documentation stashed on it. I seem to recall that there is. Sorry I could not be any more help right now. On 5/15/2015 11:00 AM, Charles Purvis wrote: (or might not) be interested. data on total population, land area, and workers-at-workplace, for 1990, 2000 and 2006/10. I want this at a statewide (California) level, not just for the metropolitan areas. This is part of an ongoing research project on describing changes in rural/suburban/urban patterns in California (perhaps elsewhere, as well). able to obtain a statewide, census tract level file of workers-at-work from Part 2 tables. population (Census SF3) and workers-at-work (CTPP 2000, Part 2), which is easily aggregated to census tract level. element includes place-to-place, county-to-county for ALL counties in the USA, including rural (non-metropolitan) counties. On the other hand, the “urban” elements of the CTPP is restricted to metropolitan counties, and the finest level geographies are either TAZ, block group or census tract. Whether or not the TAZes aggregate to census tracts is unknown. 1990 CTPP do NOT include tract-of-work data for non-metropolitan counties? That’s my central question. a cost-reimbursable basis. Some MPOs in California didn’t participate in the 1980 program. -- Ed Christopher _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news