Frank:
I agree wholeheartedly with your concerns. One particular issue that we, as data
'superusers' need to remember, is every federal, state, and nonprofit application
for aid, grants, loans, etc. will still ask for the same information for a set time. The
vast majority of people are still--and will be for a long time--used to using data derived
from a "point in time snapshot". Getting us used to working with
'trends' and 'characteristics' has been difficult enough. We now have to
pass that knowledge and practice onto those to whom we give that data, whether it be the
press, elected officials, nonprofit agencies, students, or the general public.
This goes beyond our transportation uses, but at the same time has a significant impact on
our transportation uses of these data.
Michael D. Golembiewski
Transportation Modeler
BERKS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
633 Court Street FL 14
Reading, PA 19601
Ph: 610 478-6300 ext 6304
Fax: 610 478-6316
e-mail: mgolembiewski@countyofberks.com<mailto:mgolembiewski@countyofberks.com>
Web:
http://www.co.berks.pa.us/dept/planning
Note: The comments on and attachment to this e-mail are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, your are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the original message, any
attachment(s) and copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
________________________________
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of
Frank Lenk
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 2:30 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] 2000 and 2006-08 work trip comparison question.
I would also be interested in a more detailed explanation of why we should not compare
overlapping period estimates. From a practical standpoint, people are going to do it
anyway, especially the press. What do we need to know - other than the inherent issues of
what is a statistically significant vs. insignificant change and the fact that ACS was
designed to examine characteristics of the population rather than its level - to be able
to correct naïve interpretations of easily calculated tract-level year-to-year differences
in the estimates of things like poverty rate, unemployment rate, educational attainment
rates, etc.? What is a correct interpretation of these differences?
Frank
Frank Lenk
Director of Research Services
Mid-America Regional Council
600 Broadway, Suite 200
Kansas City, MO 64105
www.marc.org<http://www.marc.org>
816.474.4240
flenk@marc.org<mailto:flenk@marc.org>
816.701.8237
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of
Kendra Watkins
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 10:05 AM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] 2000 and 2006-08 work trip comparison question.
This is interesting. I recall hearing this guidance in the past. However on the Census
website on the ACS page it specifically states; "Generally, you can compare American
Community Survey (ACS) 3-year and 5-year estimates with Census 2000 data. There are
differences in the universe, question wording, residence rules, reference periods, and the
way in which the data are tabulated which can impact comparability."
The qualifier in the second sentence addresses the conflict (different methods, time
periods etc) but I can't find anywhere on the ACS pages where the Census recommends we
not compare ACS to decennial Census. And when I search by subject the Journey to Work
topic states that I can 'Compare' it to the 2000 Census.
It does specifically state not to compare overlapping years on multiyear estimates.
Kendra Watkins
Senior Data Analyst
Mid-Region Council of Governments
809 Copper Ave. NW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
Phone: (505)724-3601
Fax: (505)247-1753
Email: kwatkins@mrcog-nm.gov<mailto:tgaudette@mrcog-nm.gov>
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential
information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of
Weinberger, Penelope
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 8:41 AM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: RE: [CTPP] 2000 and 2006-08 work trip comparison question.
The CB does not recommend comparing an ACS based data set to a CB Long Form based data
set. The 2000 data represent a point in time estimate, the ACS data represent a period
estimate. Furthermore, the Census Bureau recommends not comparing period estimates with
overlapping years.
Penelope Weinberger
CTPP Program Manager
AASHTO
202-624-3556
http://ctpp.transportation.org/Pages/default.aspx
It's just as bad to not make a plan as to blindly follow the one you already have.
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of
Seidensticker, Dan
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:18 PM
To: (ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net)
Subject: [CTPP] 2000 and 2006-08 work trip comparison question.
We downloaded the2006-2008 ACS county-to-county worker flow for Dane County, Wisconsin
from
http://ctpp.transportation.org/Pages/3yrdas.aspx.
The question we now have...can that data be compared to the county-to-county 2000 CTPP
work trips to determine any statistically significant increase/decrease? If so, how
would one calculate the margin of error?
Dan Seidensticker
GIS Specialist
Madison Area Transportation Planning Board:
A Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
City of Madison Planning Unit
121 S. Pinckney Street, Suite 400
Madison, WI 53703
Voice: 608-266-9119
Fax: 608-261-9967
Email: dseidensticker@cityofmadison.com<mailto:dseidensticker@cityofmadison.com>
www.MadisonAreaMPO.org<http://www.madisonareampo.org/>