All:
My apologies for opening such a can of worms with my reply regarding FHWA/FTA reviews of
MPO Benefits & Burdens analysis documents. Many of you are aware of these issues, but
I'd like to address some questions that have arisen, if I may...
'Environmental Justice' traces many of its origins to Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, which says that "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of
race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program receiving Federal financial
assistance."
In 1994, then-President Clinton issued Executive Order 12898 that extends those rights by
mandating that "Each Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part
of its mission by addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income populations."
Furthermore, through various pieces of legislation and legislative guidance, the spirit
and intent of Environmental Justice-if not the letter of the law--has been extended to
other groups such as the elderly, those with Limited English Proficiency and those with
disabilities (see the Americans with Disabilities Act). These issues are particularly
pronounced in the transportation realm in that, through highway, transit, pedestrian and
all other modes, movement affects ALL persons from ALL walks of life. We, as
transportation practitioners, need to ensure that we are addressing these persons (note
that the legislation specifically says "persons" and "populations",
not "citizens") in our planning and programming.
The question regarding vehicle ownership as a "protected class" under E.J. is
interesting. While vehicle ownership for most of us is a choice, those with limited
income and/or certain disabilities are, by virtue of their situations, precluded from
vehicle ownership. For them, it is not a choice. In our MPO and, I suspect many
MPO's, overlaying a map of low-income households with a map of zero-car households
would show striking similarities. Very walkable and/or expensive cities like New York and
Philadelphia have a wealth of transportation options that allow many residents a car-free
lifestyle. Complete transit systems, ZipCar-like institutions, mixed use development (and
redevelopment) all work in conjunction with each other to allow car-free CHOICES for
residents. In many smaller cities, that lifestyle is not a choice but a function of
circumstance.
Sorry for the rant; please don't exorcise me from this list. The discussion is
inspiring and useful! Back to DATA crunching...
Michael D. Golembiewski
Transportation Modeler
BERKS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
633 Court Street FL 14
Reading, PA 19601
Ph: 610 478-6300 ext 6304
Fax: 610 478-6316
e-mail: mgolembiewski@countyofberks.com<mailto:mgolembiewski@countyofberks.com>
Web:
http://www.co.berks.pa.us/dept/planning
Note: The comments on and attachment to this e-mail are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, your are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the original message, any
attachment(s) and copies. Thank you for your cooperation.