For ACS 2005-2007 population and housing occupancy/vacancy estimates, are people finding discrepancies between ACS and other data sources, particularly in sub-county geographies? ACS estimates are controlled at the county level and, like the ACS 1-year data, ACS 2005-2007 population estimates are showing disagreement with other data sources. For example, the Oakland 3-year ACS estimate shows the population at 372,000, when CA Dept. of Finance estimates are over 400,000. This runs counter to the on-the-ground anecdotal experience - ACS shows a loss of 30,000 people during a period that showed an increase of 10,000 housing units.
Will the decennial census correct this? My understanding is that Census 2010 numbers will be used to control 2010 ACS characteristic data. There will need to be some adjustment, however, given that the decennial census benchmarks population at April 1, and ACS uses a July 1 population number. It's also my understanding that population estimates for 2001-2009 will be updated, though retroactive adjustments for ACS characteristics will not be done. Does anyone else know something different about this?
Other thoughts about this?
Thanks,
Shimon
---------------------------------------------------------------
Shimon Israel
Associate Transportation Planner/Analyst
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
(510) 817-5839 (office)
(510) 817-5848 (fax)
---------------------------------------------------------------
IN THIS CENSUS NEWS BRIEF:
MN Lawmaker Challenges Mandatory Census Response
Stakeholder Activities
Census Bureau Confirms New Data Tabulation Policy
2010 Census Operational Update
MINNESOTA LAWMAKER CHALLENGES CENSUS RESPONSE REQUIREMENT
In a news interview last week, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) said her
family would not answer any questions in next year's decennial census
beyond the number of people in her household. The two-term
congresswoman told the Washington Times "America's Morning News" on June
17, "We won't be answering any information beyond [how many people are
in our home], because the Constitution doesn't require any information
beyond that," according to an article in the newspaper. Article I,
section 2, of the Constitution, as modified by the Fourteenth Amendment,
requires a census of population every ten years for purposes of
congressional apportionment, in "such Manner as they [Congress] shall by
Law direct." Congress delegated authority for taking the census to the
Secretary of Commerce, who may "obtain such other census information as
necessary" in conducting the decennial census of population (13, U.S.C.,
§141). The U.S. Supreme Court also has applied the Constitution's
"equal protection clause" to a series of cases involving the size and
composition of congressional districts, which historically have been
drawn -- by law or necessity -- using census data.
The Census Act (13, U.S.C., §221) requires responses to the decennial
census. A person who "refuses" or "willfully neglects" to answer any
census questions is subject to a fine of not more than $100. A person
who "willfully" provides false information can be fined up to $500
(§222). The 2010 census questionnaire covers six topics: age; gender;
relationship to head of household; Hispanic origin; race; and tenure
(homeowner or renter). The Census Bureau requests names of people
residing in the household, to ensure full coverage and minimize the
likelihood of duplication, and a telephone number, in case it must
follow-up to obtain missing or unclear information, but it does not ask
for social security or any other identification number. Rep. Bachmann
said in the interview that she was concerned about the role of the
Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now (ACORN), one of
thousands of national, regional, and local groups that will be 2010
census "partners." "They [ACORN] will be in charge of going door to
door and collecting data from the American public," the congresswoman
said. Last week, Rep. Bachmann criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
(D-CA) for allowing the Rules Committee to limit the number of
amendments offered to the Fiscal Year 2010 Commerce, Justice and Science
Appropriations bill, which funds the Census Bureau. The congresswoman
and Rep. Steve King (R-IA) had hoped to prevent ACORN or its affiliates
from receiving federal funds through agencies covered by the bill; their
amendments were not made "in order" during floor debate.
The 2010 Census Partnership Program encourages organizations to sign an
agreement, "formally pledging their commitment to share the 2010 Census
message and mobilize their constituents in support of the Census
Bureau's goal of achieving a complete count," according to the agency's
web site. The Census Bureau offers promotional, educational, and
outreach materials for partner organizations to use and modify, as
appropriate, to reach their audiences. Partner organizations are
encouraged to display and distribute promotional materials; serve as
Questionnaire Assistance Centers and Be Counted sites; include articles
about the census in their newsletters; and urge their constituents to
complete their census forms, among other activities. Partners also can
refer individuals to the Census Bureau for temporary census jobs;
applicants must take a test and are subject to background checks and
fingerprinting, regardless of who referred them for the position.
Census partners do not receive direct monetary assistance, and they are
not directly responsible for any formal aspect of the enumeration.
Republicans press Census Bureau to explain ACORN partnership: Rep.
Patrick McHenry (R-NC), the senior Republican on the House census
oversight subcommittee, sent a letter to Acting Census Director Thomas
Mesenbourg last week, seeking an explanation for "the continued
involvement of the criminally-charged [ACORN] in 2010 census
operations." The congressman noted that he and other committee
Republicans had written previously to the Census Bureau, questioning the
involvement in the census of "an organization with a history of
falsifying government documents," but that the agency "had failed to
respond."
STAKEHOLDER ACTIVITIES
Census stakeholders across the country are turning up the spotlight on
the importance of participating in next year's population count.
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced the formation of the
State's Complete Count Committee on June 12, saying, "We must reach out
to all Californians across the state to make certain everyone is
counted so that California gets its fair share of federal dollars and
representation in congress." The committee's 53 members represent a
wide range of sectors that rely on accurate census data, including
state and municipal offices, educational institutions, community service
and public policy organizations, labor unions and businesses,
faith-based groups, and civil rights advocates.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors' Census 2010 Task Force convened at the
organization's annual meeting in Providence, RI, on June 15, to discuss
ways that local governments can promote participation in the decennial
count. Task Force Chairman Mark Mallory, Mayor of Cincinnati, urged his
colleagues to play a leadership role in bringing together diverse
constituencies in support of the 2010 census. Utah's two largest
cities, Salt Lake City and West Valley City, have formed complete count
committees, in an effort to convince their residents -- especially
Latinos, a group local officials believe was undercounted in 2000 --
according to a June 17 article in the Salt Lake Tribune.
The New York Immigrant Coalition held a news conference earlier this
month to educate the City's ethnic media about the importance of an
accurate census for immigrant communities. Participants included New
York Regional Census Director Tony Farthing and New York City's
Commissioner of Immigrant Affairs Guillermo Linares.
The Coalition of Bar Associations of Color adopted a resolution
supporting full funding for the 2010 census, calling for a moratorium on
immigration raids during the census, and encouraging its members and
chapters to become 2010 Census Partners and to participate on Complete
Count Committees in their local areas.
Editor's note: This summary of recent stakeholder activities in support
of an accurate 2010 census is not meant to be inclusive (which,
fortunately, would be difficult), but rather to demonstrate the scope of
interest in next year's count, through a few noteworthy examples, and to
share ideas across all communities of interest.
CENSUS BUREAU CONFIRMS POLICY CHANGE ON SAME-SEX SPOUSE RESPONSES
The Census Bureau confirmed that it will change its policy with respect
to tabulating marital status responses in the 2010 census. Spokesman
Steve Jost told The Associated Press (June 19, 2009) that, "They [same
sex married couples] will be counted, and they ought to report the way
they see themselves," promising that publications following the census
would offer a "good data set on which to discuss this phenomenon that is
evolving in this country." Under the new policy, which it has not yet
formally issued, the bureau would tabulate same-sex spouse responses to
the relationship question as married couples, reversing a policy set
during the previous Administration that would have re-coded these
couples as "unmarried partners." The agency had previously cited
provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as prohibiting federal
agencies from tabulating data that reflected gay marriages.
2010 CENSUS OPERATIONAL UPDATE
The Census Bureau will open two of three Data Capture Centers (DCCs) in
the coming weeks, one in Baltimore (June 29) and one in Jeffersonville,
IN (July 8), also home to the bureau's National Processing Center. The
centers will hire thousands of workers to process tens of millions of
questionnaires during the height of census operations next year.
Lockheed Martin won a six-year contract in 2005 for the 2010 Census
Decennial Response Integration System (DRIS), which will capture and
standardize information reported on census forms. Census questionnaires
begin rolling off the presses next month.
Census News Briefs are prepared by Terri Ann Lowenthal, an independent
legislative and policy consultant specializing in the census and federal
statistics. All views expressed in the News Briefs are solely those of
the author. Please direct questions about the information in this News
Brief to Ms. Lowenthal at TerriAnn2K(a)aol.com. Please feel free to
circulate this document to other interested individuals and
organizations. Ms. Lowenthal is a consultant to the nonpartisan Census
Project, organized by the Communications Consortium Media Center in
Washington, DC. Previous Census News Briefs are posted at
www.thecensusproject.org
[http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102617629772&s=12&e=001mj_hpcvrJaEdVhKfns-PmffDPW…].
--
Ed Christopher
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (cell)
FHWA RC-TST-PLN
19900 Governors Dr
Olympia Fields, IL 60461
One of the benefits of APDU membership is Ken Hodges' meticulous notes
from the Census Advisory Committee.
http://www.apdu.org/advocacy/dcac.htm Ken represents APDU in this CB
committee.
At the meeting, Susan Schechter gave an ACS status report, including
discussion of the March 2009 Fed Register notice regarding 5-year ACS
data products. Quoting from Ken's notes, "They (CB) received about 25
comments on these proposals, many from the transportation community
because the most severe restrictions on 5-year ACS data are applied to
the journey to work data. The Census Bureau is reviewing the comments
now, and working toward final specifications."
Some of the responses submitted to the FR notice are posted at the TRB
Census subcommittee page: http://www.trbcensus.com/notes.html (look
under the title "Census-related notes and articles"
Also very interesting is that the Joint Advisory Advertising Review
Panel (JAARP) issued a vote of "no confidence" in the company,
DraftFCB for their work on the 2010 Census. Ken's notes include much
more detail about this.
FHWA is a corporate member of APDU (which is a paperwork struggle, just
so you know). Ed Christopher, FHWA Resource Center Planning Team now is
on the APDU Board. For more information about APDU (Association of
Public Data Users, please visit their website: www.apdu.org
<http://www.apdu.org/>
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 18, 2009
To: Ed Christopher and ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
From: Thabet Zakaria
Subject: Removal of Name From ctpp.net
Dear Ed:
Please remove my name from cttp.net effective June 30, 2009 because of retirement. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for reviewing my TRB papers and emails on transportation surveys, census data, journey-to-work, population and employment estimates, CTPP, and ACS during the last 30 years. Also, many thanks go to the members of this net including, but not limited to, Elaine Murakami, Chuck Purvis, Nancy McGuckin, Ken Cervenka, Catharine Lawson, Alan Pisarski, David Pearson, Rolf Schmitt, Peter Stopher, Nanda Srinivasan, Jerry Everet, Kevin Tierney, Clara Reschovsky, and Jonette Kreideweis.
By the way, I have evaluated the latest results of the ACS (2007 and 2005-2007) and found out that the ACS data are useless for all areas promised by the Census Bureau (65,000 and 20,000 population). Even at the county level (larger than 250,000 population), I had to make some adjustments to the ACS data to make them reasonable. These adjustments are based on local data and other census information. As you know, DVRPC does not use or publish any unreasonable data. There are nine counties and 352 municipalities in the region that depend on DVRPC data.
As you will recall, I have stated on this net and in many national conferences that the current ACS methods and procedures will not produce accurate or usable zonal data for transportation planning and travel forecasting. I hope that FHWA and AASHTO will convince the Census Bureau to replace the ACS with the Long-Form in Census 2020. I think that accurate data from the Long-Form every 10 years are much more useful to the transportation community than erroneous data from the ACS every year.
Thabet Zakaria
Deputy Director, Technical Services
Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
Phone: (215) 238-2885
Email: tzakaria(a)dvrpc.org
Fax: (215) 592-9125
BREAKING NEWS: 2010 Census Funding at Risk on House Floor
2010 Census Funding at Risk on House Floor: Funding for the Census
Bureau next year could be slashed significantly as the U.S. House of
Representatives begins debating the Fiscal Year 2010 Commerce, Justice,
and Science Appropriations bill (H.R. 2847) today.
Rep. Pete Olson (R-TX) is expected to offer an amendment that would
shift $566.5 million from the Census Bureau to NASA's exploration
account, more than eight percent of the $6.671 billion the
Appropriations Committee allocated for 2010 census operations in the
fiscal year that begins on October 1, 2009.
Numerous additional amendments that would siphon off funds from the
Census Bureau -- always a target for lawmakers seeking to boost funding
for law enforcement, science, and other popular programs in the massive
spending bill -- are expected over the next two days.
According to analyses by the Brookings Institution, almost $400 billion
in federal program funds annually -- $4 trillion over the decade -- is
allocated to states and localities based in whole or in part on census
data. The analyses, broken down by program and by state, are available
on The Census Project web site at www.thecensusproject.org (under Fact
Sheets).
The Census Bureau's FY2010 budget also took an unexpected hit in the
Appropriations Committee last week, when a misunderstanding between
panel members and the Commerce Department (the Census Bureau's parent
department) led appropriators to reduce the agency's funding by $206
million. Lawmakers had thought the amount, appearing in the President's
detailed budget request as a carry-over from 2009, represented extra
money, when in fact the Census Bureau had committed the funds to a paid
media buy.
The Administration told Congress yesterday that if the $206 million is
not restored before Congress finalizes the Commerce spending measure,
the Census Bureau would reduce a planned $573 million contingency fund
for the 2010 census by that amount. The contingency fund, the
Administration said, would cover unanticipated conditions, such as a
lower-than-projected mail response rate or more vacant units that
increase the non-response follow-up workload, or unforeseen events, such
as a natural disaster or health pandemic. The emergency fund, Census
officials told Congress, "is not a very large reserve for a
once-a-decade program of this size and complexity, which must be
completed by statutory deadlines."
Census News Briefs are prepared by Terri Ann Lowenthal, an independent
legislative and policy consultant specializing in the census and federal
statistics. All views expressed in the News Briefs are solely those of
the author. Please direct questions about the information in this News
Brief to Ms. Lowenthal at TerriAnn2K(a)aol.com. Please feel free to
circulate this document to other interested individuals and organizations.
--
Ed Christopher
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (cell)
FHWA Resource Center
19900 Governors Dr
Olympia Fields, IL 60461
Hi Everyone: Thank you to the enthusiastic crowd of about 225-250
attendees from the session last Friday.
The session is now available:
http://fhwa.na3.acrobat.com/p20171907/
While in the recorded session, you will be able to go to the "download"
pod and download the ppts and other documents shared by the Census
Bureau staff. Some of the time, the download pod is not in the viewing
area, so if you move toward the end of the presentation, the download
pod will be seen.
There were a lot of questions that were raised and FHWA, FTA, and Census
Bureau staff are working on compiling answers as best we can. We will
notify everyone using the CTPP listserv when they are posted.
All of you are obviously members of the CTPP-listserv, but several
people who joined the webinar are not. Please let them know that the
best way to keep "in touch" is to subscribe to the CTPP Listserv.
http://www.trbcensus.com/maillist.html If you request "digest" you
will reduce the number of individual emails you receive and get a
compiled set when there are several in a day. You can also look at the
archive of this listserv via this link. This link ALSO includes how to
UNSUBSCRIBE to the listserv.
Elaine Murakami
Elaine.murakami(a)dot.gov
206-220-4460
Hi All,
The CTPP has issued a request for proposals from all interested parties
to develop CTPP Data Access Software.
The RFP and all relevant supplemental materials can be downloaded at:
http://ctpp.transportation.org/home/rfp.html
Please forward this notice to all interested parties.
Penelope Weinberger
CTPP Program Manager
AASHTO
202-624-3556
www.transportation.org
It's just as bad to not make a plan as to blindly follow the one you
already have.
I will be out of the office starting 06/10/2009 and will not return until
06/15/2009.
For immediate assistance regarding the American Community Survey, please
contact Ms. Cynthia Hollingsworth on 301-763-3655;
cynthia.davis.hollingsworth(a)census.gov, or visit our website at
www.census.gov.
Thank you.
HOUSE APPROPRIATORS APPROVE 2010 CENSUS FUNDING;
GROVES NOMINATION ON HOLD IN SENATE
House appropriators fended off a proposal to strip $100 million from the
Census Bureau’s 2010 budget before approving the Fiscal Year 2010
(FY2010) Commerce, Justice, and Science and Related Agencies spending
bill yesterday, allocating the full $7.375 billion for the agency that
the Administration’s requested.
The proposed funding level is $4.235 billion more than this year’s
appropriation; the Census Bureau received an additional $1 billion for
2010 census operations in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(the stimulus bill). Almost all of the increase would go towards the
decennial census under the Periodic Censuses and Programs account, which
received $7.116 billion in the committee bill. Roughly $6.9 billion of
this amount is for the 2010 census, which includes the American
Community Survey (ACS), leaving $214.6 million for other cyclical
programs such as the Economic Census ($111.7 million) and annual
(“intercensal”) demographic estimates ($10.4 million).
The committee bill appropriates $259 million for the bureau’s Salaries
and Expenses account, covering ongoing economic, demographic, and social
statistics programs such as the Survey of Income and Program
Participation (SIPP), which would receive $4.6 million more than in
Fiscal Year 2009 for a total of $50.3 million.
By a vote of 21 – 30, the Committee on Appropriations defeated an
amendment offered by Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) to shift $100 million from
the Census Bureau to the Justice Department’s State Criminal Alien
Assistance Program (SCAAP), which the President had slated for
elimination in his own budget. All Democratic members of the committee
who were present voted against the amendment. (There are 37 Democrats
and 23 Republicans on the committee.) California historically has
received about 40 percent of SCAAP funds, and the Census Bureau has been
the target of similar off-setting amendments to increase funding for law
enforcement programs in past years, although none had proposed shifting
such a large amount of money. Some apportionment projections for 2010
show that California could be at risk of losing one of its current 53
congressional districts after the census.
In the committee report accompanying the spending bill, appropriators
expressed particular interest in 2010 census outreach, promotion, and
paid advertising activities. They noted that a Census Bureau advisory
panel had characterized much of the proposed paid advertising campaign
as “obsolete,” and they directed the agency to ensure that all
communications activities focus on increasing mail response rates,
especially in historically hard-to-count communities. The committee
asked for more information on the language assistance program, saying
that it was concerned that the Census Bureau “has not adequately planned
for assistance in languages other than Spanish for the 2010 census and
ACS.” The report called on the Census Bureau to ensure a diverse
temporary workforce for the decennial census, as well as to improve the
diversity of its full time workforce, “including at the senior
management level.”
The committee bill would provide $7.7 million less than the President
requested for new initiatives at the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA),
the second Commerce Department statistical agency housed in the
Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA). Committee documents
indicate that lawmakers reduced funding “to support higher priority
activities.” ESA would receive a total allocation of $97.2 million, an
increase of about $6.6 million over 2009. Appropriators agreed to fund
two proposed new BEA initiatives, to develop new estimation models for
financial services statistics and to enhance and accelerate county-level
economic statistics.
The Appropriations Committee approved the $64.4 billion Commerce
spending measure – overall, about $200 million less than the President
requested – by voice vote. The full House is tentatively scheduled to
take up the funding bill on June 16-17.
“Objection” puts Groves nomination on hold in Senate: The nomination of
Dr. Robert Groves to be Census Bureau director remains in limbo, a
possible victim both of specific concerns about his candidacy and of
partisan maneuvering over unrelated issues.
Late last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) called up Dr.
Groves’ nomination under a “unanimous consent” request, a procedure
sometimes used to uncover specific concerns any senators might harbor
about a nominee and to move a nomination more quickly to a vote. Senate
Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) objected to consideration of
the nomination, saying he did not yet have the consent of all of his
party’s members. Any senator who wants to delay a vote on the
nomination has six Senate business days (from the time of the unanimous
consent request) to come forward.
The Majority Leader’s effort to bring the nomination up for a vote in
the full Senate has been hampered further, however, by controversy over
another nomination. Republican senators reportedly have decided to
delay consideration of all nominations (except for some key Defense
Department posts), to protest the Democratic majority’s decision to
start hearings on Supreme Court candidate Sonia Sotomayor in early July.
Legislative update: Rep. Charles Dent (R-PA), joined by a bipartisan
group of 23 lawmakers, introduced a “sense of the House” resolution (H.
Res. 521), highlighting the importance of a “complete and accurate” 2010
census. The measure notes important uses of census population numbers,
including congressional apportionment, make-up of the Electoral College,
decision-making by businesses, and the allocation of federal funds for a
wide range of programs. “[A]reas are ultimately underserved by the
Federal Government when significant portions of the population,
especially those in low-income and minority neighborhoods, fail to
participate in the census,” the resolution notes. Rep. Dent’s bill
“encourages full participation” in the census and urges State, local,
and Tribal governments to promote awareness and cooperation with the
count. The resolution, which must only pass the House of
Representatives and would not be signed into law, was referred to the
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Census News Briefs are prepared by Terri Ann Lowenthal, an independent
legislative and policy consultant specializing in the census and federal
statistics. All views expressed in the News Briefs are solely those of
the author. Please direct questions about the information in this News
Brief to Ms. Lowenthal at TerriAnn2K(a)aol.com. Please feel free to
circulate this document to other interested individuals and
organizations. Ms. Lowenthal is a consultant to the nonpartisan Census
Project, organized by the Communications Consortium Media Center in
Washington, DC. Previous Census News Briefs are posted at
www.thecensusproject.org.
--
Ed Christopher
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (cell)
FHWA RC-TST-PLN
19900 Governors Dr
Olympia Fields, IL 60461
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE APPROVES 2010 CENSUS FUNDING
A House appropriations subcommittee allocated $7.37 billion for the
Census Bureau in Fiscal Year 2010 (FY2010), the amount the
Administration requested, representing a 135 percent funding increase
(about $4.23 billion) over Fiscal Year 2009. Overall, the $64.4 billion
bill represents a 12 percent increase over the 2009 spending level for
this appropriations account.
The draft bill includes $7.116 billion for Periodic Censuses and
Programs, one of two main Census Bureau accounts, which covers the
decennial census, American Community Survey, Economic Census, and other
cyclical programs. A specific funding level for the 2010 census is not
yet available; the President requested $6.97 billion in new budget
authority for 2010 census activities. The quinquennial Economic Census
is beginning a new planning cycle for the 2012 survey and would receive
$111.7 million.
The bill allocates $259 million for the second main account, Salaries
and Expenses, which covers ongoing surveys and data programs such as the
Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The Census Bureau
would receive $50.3 million for the SIPP program.
Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV), chairman of the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Justice, and Science and Related Agencies, noted at the start of the
panel’s “mark-up” that the FY2010 Congressional Budget Resolution
provided a lower overall limit on discretionary spending than President
Obama’s budget request for next year, requiring appropriators to make
“hard choices” and reduce or eliminate funding for some programs “that
many members support.” Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), the panel’s senior
Republican, expressed concern about the bill’s funding level. “This
level of spending is unsustainable in light of our growing deficits and
debt,” Rep. Wolf said. “I believe that we could have met the most urgent
needs by prioritizing within a lower allocation.” Reps. Mollohan and
Wolf both mentioned that the bill funds the Justice Department’s popular
State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) well below the 2009
spending level (the President’s budget proposed eliminating SCAAP),
possibly suggesting that lawmakers might look for ways to shift money
from other programs within the Commerce, Justice, and Science bill to
increase SCAAP funding as the appropriations measure moves through the
House and Senate.
The committee report accompanying the funding measure is not printed
yet, but committee sources indicated that appropriators continue to urge
the Census Bureau to focus sufficient 2010 census advertising,
promotion, and outreach efforts on the hardest-to-count population
groups, including people with limited English language proficiency, and
to ensure more diversity in hiring.
Stakeholder organizations sent letters expressing strong support for the
President’s Census Bureau budget request in the days leading up to the
mark-up. The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR) urged the
panel to allocate the full amount the President requested for the Census
Bureau, saying “an accurate census is a vital civil rights objective.”
The Consortium of Social Science Associations (COSSA), a member of the
2010 Census Advisory Committee, also highlighted adequate funding for
other important Census Bureau activities, including the American
Community Survey (ACS), which replaced the traditional census “long
form” and will produce census tract-level estimates of key
socio-economic indicators for the first time in late 2010.
Hispanic clergy urge immigrants to participate in census: The National
Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference (NHCLC) issued a statement
today, urging Latinos and immigrants to participate in the 2010 census.
Dr. Jesse Miranda, CEO of the NHCLC, said that an accurate census is
“critical for the continued economic and political progress of the
Latino community.” The NHCLC serves 16 million Hispanic born-again
Christians in the United States and Puerto Rico, according to the statement.
The Hispanic pastors have joined with Comunidad Presbiteriana Hispana &
El Pozo de Jacob, the Jesse Miranda Center for Hispanic Christian
Leadership, the Hispanic Mega Church Association, the Hispanic
Pentecostal Congress, and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to
implement a widespread campaign, ya es hora !HAGASE CONTAR! (It’s Time,
Make Yourself Count!), encouraging Hispanics to participate in the 2010
census. The National Association for Latino Elected and Appointed
Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund is leading the campaign in
conjunction with Mi Familia Vota Education Fund, National Council of La
Raza, and major Hispanic media companies such as Univision, as well as
other national, state, and local partners.
The religious leaders also expressed opposition to a boycott of the
census by undocumented immigrants. “By diminishing the representation
of newcomers in our democracy, an [census] undercount will also
undermine efforts to achieve comprehensive immigration reform,” Dr.
Miranda said. “Encouraging anyone not to participate in the Census is
simply wrong.” The National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian
Leaders (CONLAMIC), which represents 20,000 churches in 34 states,
according to its web site, has called for a boycott of the census among
undocumented residents. An April 18th statement announcing the boycott
said the organization hoped to compel the Obama Administration and
Congress to enact comprehensive immigration reform. The Congressional
Hispanic Caucus also has challenged the boycott campaign, saying that
failure to achieve a complete count of the Latino population “would have
political implications and jeopardize vital resources” that flow to
communities based on census data (April 16 CHC press statement).
Did you know? (An occasional feature of fun census facts!) The 2010
census is a paper-intensive, as well as labor-intensive, undertaking.
The Census Bureau has begun assembling kits at its National Processing
Center (NPC) in Jeffersonville, IN, for census takers and other field
staff to use next year. The process is automated for the first time,
almost quadrupling the pace of the task over manual assembly. The NPC
will assemble 5.5 million kits -- six billion (with a “b”!) pieces of
paper in all – over a 15 - 18 month period. The stack of paper would be
27 Empire State Buildings high! Who knew?
Comic relief: I rarely stray from my “just the facts, m’am” reporting
of census news, but I’m sure we can all use a good laugh as we hurtle at
lightening speed towards the 2010 census. So I thought census
stakeholders would enjoy a funny Saturday Night Live skit about a census
taker (posted on You Tube), featuring Christopher Walken. Enjoy (and
thanks to the former Census Bureau official who brought this to my
attention)! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XtuPvwBa2U
Census News Briefs are prepared by Terri Ann Lowenthal, an independent
legislative and policy consultant specializing in the census and federal
statistics. All views expressed in the News Briefs are solely those of
the author. Please direct questions about the information in this News
Brief to Ms. Lowenthal at TerriAnn2K(a)aol.com. Please feel free to
circulate this document to other interested individuals and
organizations. Ms. Lowenthal is a consultant to the nonpartisan Census
Project, organized by the Communications Consortium Media Center in
Washington, DC. Previous Census News Briefs are posted at
www.thecensusproject.org.
--
Ed Christopher
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (cell)
FHWA RC-TST-PLN
19900 Governors Dr
Olympia Fields, IL 60461