Got this from our friends at the Census Bureau...
Ed,
I have just learned that there will be a user note issued and a
re-release
of the 2003 and 2004 ACS PUMS files. Inconsistencies in the Veteran's
Status items and an error in the recode for ancestry have been found and
will be corrected. No estimate of that release date was given.
However, I
thought that the CTPP community might want to know.
-- Celia
1. The Census Bureau released the "balance" of the 2004 ACS tabulations
on American Factfinder this past Thursday, 11/17/2005. Or so we thought.
We're currently wading through the "CTPP Part 1 - like" tables that were
just released, but we're concerned about four tables in particular.
Can someone at the Census Bureau or USDOT comment on the four tables
that are "placeholder tables" in American Factfinder, but don't yet have
data? These are the "workplace geography" tables:
B08406 Sex of Workers by Detailed Means of Transportation for Workplace
Geography
B08526 Means of Transportation to Work by Industry for Workplace
Geography
B08528 Means of Transportation to Work by Class of Worker for Workplace
Geography
B08534 Means of Transportation to Work by Travel TIme to Work for
Workplace Geography
Hopefully the data is "coming soon"!
2. A different question about geography in the ACS: when will the
Census Bureau convert from the older metropolitan area to the newer
metropolitan area definitions? That is, converting from the
MSA/PMSA/CMSA geographies to the CBSA/CSA geographies? [My guess is this
will change with the release of the 2005 ACS data, next summer, but it
would be useful to confirm.]
Thanks in advance!
Chuck Purvis
**************************************************************
Charles L. Purvis, AICP
Principal Transportation Planner/Analyst
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
(510) 817-5755 (office) [new, 8/1/05]
(510) 817-7848 (fax) [new, 8/1/05]
www: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/
Census WWW: http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/
**************************************************************
Hi Everyone - here is a DRAFT of my article for the next issue of the
CTPP Status Report, which we plan to finalize in early December. So,
you will see GAPS but I hope no errors, especially as Phil Salopek has
not yet reviewed my draft.
"Workplace Geography" now part of ACS Standard Tabulation Package
by Elaine Murakami, FHWA
The Census Bureau is now issuing tables for workplace geography using
ACS data.
Previously, the only standard Census product using workplace geography
was the County-to-county flow tabulation (put link here). Otherwise,
workplace tabulations were part of the CTPP, the special tabulation
completed from the AASHTO pooled fund.
Already, the Census Bureau has released four Workplace Tables for
southeastern States impacted by recent hurricanes (Alabama, Arkansas,
Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas). By January 2006,
__ additional tables at workplace geography will be posted to the ACS
webpage. As ACS is a continuous survey with small samples each month,
tabulations are currently available only for areas (States, County,
Places) with more than 250,000 population. Because the ACS in 2004
was only in a test phase, it is perhaps best to treat this information
as training in familiarity with planned ACS products.
In late 2006, tabulations for areas with more than 65,000 population
will be available, as ACS went into full implementation in 2005.
Table Name
Residence
Workplace
Sex by Means of Transportation to Work
B08006
B08406
Means of Transportation to Work by Travel Time
B08134
B08534
Sex by Place of Work - State and County Level
B08007
Aggregate Travel Time to Work by Sex
B08013
Means of Transportation to Work by Industry
B08526
Means of Transportation to Work by Class of Worker
B08528
For a complete list of Workplace Geography tables, please see (put link
here to Phil's list? Or link to the CB ACS page Table List)
Miami-Dade County
Residence
Workplace
2000 SF3
ACS 2004
CTPP 2000
ACS 2004
Mode to Work
Total
899,323
1,007,975
956,460
1,075,227
Drove Alone
73.8%
78.4%
74.9%
79.2%
Carpool
14.6%
9.4%
14.2%
9.3%
Transit
5.1%
4.9%
4.7%
4.7%
Walk
2.2%
2.0%
2.0%
1.8%
Other
1.8%
1.6%
1.6%
1.6%
Work at Home
2.7%
3.6%
2.5%
3.4%
1. ACS consistently has less carpooling. From Decennial 2000,
Hispanic workers are the most likely to carpool, and that neighborhoods
with high Hispanic population have much lower mail-back response rate
than White, Non-Hispanic neighborhoods in ACS. Perhaps the 2005 ACS
results will be more similar to Decennial 2000 results as higher
non-response follow-up field interviewing that began in 2005 should
capture Hispanic, Black and Native-American populations more accurately.
2. Census 2000 includes population in Group Quarters. (What do we
know about GQ workers in 2000? Nationwide, about 36% of the
non-institutionalized Group Quarters population are workers. So there
are an estimated 5,900 additional GQ workers in Miami-Dade (didn't want
to try to use PUMS to figure this out). So, probably would not make
any difference in overall Miami-Dade figures 6000 workers out of
900,000.-might bump up "walk" a little bit, since nationwide, about 40%
of workers in group quarters walk to work.
-----Original Message-----
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net
[mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Purvis
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 10:29 AM
To: CTPP-News
Subject: [CTPP] New 2004 ACS data on American Factfinder: Missing
Tables?
1. The Census Bureau released the "balance" of the 2004 ACS tabulations
on American Factfinder this past Thursday, 11/17/2005. Or so we thought.
We're currently wading through the "CTPP Part 1 - like" tables that were
just released, but we're concerned about four tables in particular.
Can someone at the Census Bureau or USDOT comment on the four tables
that are "placeholder tables" in American Factfinder, but don't yet have
data? These are the "workplace geography" tables:
B08406 Sex of Workers by Detailed Means of Transportation for Workplace
Geography
B08526 Means of Transportation to Work by Industry for Workplace
Geography
B08528 Means of Transportation to Work by Class of Worker for Workplace
Geography
B08534 Means of Transportation to Work by Travel TIme to Work for
Workplace Geography
Hopefully the data is "coming soon"!
2. A different question about geography in the ACS: when will the
Census Bureau convert from the older metropolitan area to the newer
metropolitan area definitions? That is, converting from the
MSA/PMSA/CMSA geographies to the CBSA/CSA geographies? [My guess is this
will change with the release of the 2005 ACS data, next summer, but it
would be useful to confirm.]
Thanks in advance!
Chuck Purvis
**************************************************************
Charles L. Purvis, AICP
Principal Transportation Planner/Analyst
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
(510) 817-5755 (office) [new, 8/1/05]
(510) 817-7848 (fax) [new, 8/1/05]
www: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/
Census WWW: http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/
**************************************************************
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
Kevin:
This error occurs when you hit the button "Install Database" on the opening flash screen. My advice is NOT to use this button, but create a session with your data path pointing to d:\...\ny folder if NY is your state.
The session creation should work just fine.
Thank you
Nanda Srinivasan
-----Original Message-----
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net]On Behalf Of Kevin Beers
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:53 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] Part 3 - Installation Errors
After installing the Viewer Software - when trying to copy Part 3 to a hard drive (for selected geographic areas), has anyone encountered a CODEBASE ERROR or a "Could Not Create Session.ini" error message?
Thanks,
Kevin D. Beers
Transportation Planner - GIS
Genesee Transportation Council
50 West Main Street, Suite 8112
Rochester, NY 14614-1227
Phone: (585) 232-6240
Fax: (585) 262-3106
E-mail: kbeers(a)gtcmpo.org
http://www.gtcmpo.org
After installing the Viewer Software - when trying to copy Part 3 to a
hard drive (for selected geographic areas), has anyone encountered a
CODEBASE ERROR or a "Could Not Create Session.ini" error message?
Thanks,
Kevin D. Beers
Transportation Planner - GIS
Genesee Transportation Council
50 West Main Street, Suite 8112
Rochester, NY 14614-1227
Phone: (585) 232-6240
Fax: (585) 262-3106
E-mail: kbeers(a)gtcmpo.org
http://www.gtcmpo.org
Andy:
Ed is correct: the PUMS is the best source of data to differentiate
between the household income of bicycle vs walk commuters. Yes, the data
is free to download from the Census Bureau's website, but you really
need stat software like SAS to SPSS to make sense out of it all. The
PUMS DVDs are great if you don't have SAS or SPSS, and if you're
comfortable with Beyond 20/20 software. The Beyond 20/20 software on the
PUMS DVD is very, very fast and is very well done. Unlike the CTPP CDs
and DVDs, the Census PUMS DVD should not be copied, but as Ed suggests,
your state data center may have a regular copy that you can have or
borrow.
Here are the Census 2000 PUMS 5% sample data for the State of
California, by "grouped" means of transportation (separated for bicycle
vs walk):
Mean Household Income (1999 constant dollars):
Drive Alone: $85,088
Carpool 2: $73,558
Carpool 3+: $68,587
Transit: $67,315
Bicycle: $62,768
Walk: $52,420
Other: $73,179
At Home: $97,789
Total: $81,567
So, bicycle commuter income is significantly higher than walk-only
commuter income in California, in 2000.
Sample size for the California PUMS:
bicycle, n=5,874 sample commuters
walk, n=21,419 sample commuters
It's also a good idea to examine the characteristics of commuters by
other traits, including sex, age, race/ethnicity, occupation and
industry. You may be able to find that the "typical bicycle commuter" is
young (20s), male, and either white or hispanic. The "typical walk
commuter" on the other hand may be middle age (40s-50s), female and
non-white. All of course depending on your regional context.
I went back and examined the 1990 CTPP data for the Bay Area, and this
trend where the "At Home" mean household income is higher than the
"drive alone" income still holds true. The best way to examine the
characteristics of "at home" workers is by industry and occupation.
cheers,
Chuck Purvis, MTC
>>> Ed Christopher <edc(a)berwyned.com> 11/10/05 11:53 AM >>>
I was reminded by some of our friends at the Census Bureau that I
mis-spoke
slightly. The 5% PUMS data is available FREE of charge from the
Census
download site. The Census 2000 PUMS download site, which includes
full
documentation, can be found at:
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2003/PUMS5.html
Data Access Tools that are available through the Census Bureau's
website
are described at: http://www.census.gov/main/www/access.html.
> >>> edc 11/10/05 08:23 >>>
>
> Andrew, if the cross tab you are interested in is not in the CTPP
> another place where you could get this would be from the PUMS data.
Of
> course the geographic area for the summary would be quite large.
The
> PUMS data are available at $$$ from the census bureau and also from
your
> state data center. You might be able to get a copy of the DVD from
them
> or maybe find someone who has one to run you a tab. Of course
getting
> your own DVD of the PUMS data is well worth having. All in all keep
in
> mind that the samples will be small and you could working in the
> variability margins of the data.
>
> Andrew PICKARD wrote:
>
> > Is anyone aware of information on income for those who commute by
> > bicycle versus those who commute by walking? Bicycle and walking
are
> > grouped together in 2000 CTPP for mean income, but I would like to
> > know if there is a difference. Thanks. Andy Pickard, P.E.
> > Senior Transportation Engineer
> > Hampton Roads Planning District Commission
> > 723 Woodlake Drive
> > Chesapeake, VA. 23320
> > Phone: 757.420.8300 Fax: 757.523.4881
> > apickard(a)hrpdc.org
> > www.hrpdc.org
> >
I was reminded by some of our friends at the Census Bureau that I mis-spoke
slightly. The 5% PUMS data is available FREE of charge from the Census
download site. The Census 2000 PUMS download site, which includes full
documentation, can be found at:
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2003/PUMS5.html
Data Access Tools that are available through the Census Bureau's website
are described at: http://www.census.gov/main/www/access.html.
> >>> edc 11/10/05 08:23 >>>
>
> Andrew, if the cross tab you are interested in is not in the CTPP
> another place where you could get this would be from the PUMS data. Of
> course the geographic area for the summary would be quite large. The
> PUMS data are available at $$$ from the census bureau and also from your
> state data center. You might be able to get a copy of the DVD from them
> or maybe find someone who has one to run you a tab. Of course getting
> your own DVD of the PUMS data is well worth having. All in all keep in
> mind that the samples will be small and you could working in the
> variability margins of the data.
>
> Andrew PICKARD wrote:
>
> > Is anyone aware of information on income for those who commute by
> > bicycle versus those who commute by walking? Bicycle and walking are
> > grouped together in 2000 CTPP for mean income, but I would like to
> > know if there is a difference. Thanks. Andy Pickard, P.E.
> > Senior Transportation Engineer
> > Hampton Roads Planning District Commission
> > 723 Woodlake Drive
> > Chesapeake, VA. 23320
> > Phone: 757.420.8300 Fax: 757.523.4881
> > apickard(a)hrpdc.org
> > www.hrpdc.org
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > ctpp-news mailing list
> > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
> > http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
> >
> --
> Ed Christopher
> 708-283-3534 (V)
> 708-574-8131 (cell)
> FHWA RC-TST-PLN
>
> _______________________________________________
> ctpp-news mailing list
> ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
> http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
--
Ed Christopher
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (cell)
FHWA RC-TST-PLN
19900 Governors Dr
Olympia Fields, IL 60461
Is anyone aware of information on income for those who commute by
bicycle versus those who commute by walking? Bicycle and walking are
grouped together in 2000 CTPP for mean income, but I would like to know
if there is a difference. Thanks.
Andy Pickard, P.E.
Senior Transportation Engineer
Hampton Roads Planning District Commission
723 Woodlake Drive
Chesapeake, VA. 23320
Phone: 757.420.8300 Fax: 757.523.4881
apickard(a)hrpdc.org
www.hrpdc.org
APPROPRIATORS SPARE CENSUS BUREAU FROM DEEP CUTS
A House and Senate conference committee agreed last Thursday to give the
Census Bureau $812.237 million in Fiscal Year 2006, rejecting a much
lower funding level adopted by the U.S. Senate in September. The Census
Bureau received enough money to continue fielding the American Community
Survey (ACS) for a second year and to add group quarters to the survey
for the first time.
The 2006 Census Field Test, scheduled for next year in Travis County,
Texas, and on the Cheyenne River Sioux Indian Reservation, South Dakota,
also is likely to proceed, although original plans could be scaled
back. Congress cut roughly $10 million from the amount requested for
2010 census redesign activities.
The conference version of H.R. 2862, the Fiscal Year 2006 Science,
State, Justice, Commerce, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
adopts the funding level approved by the House of Representatives in
June. That amount is still $65 million less than President Bush
requested for the fiscal year that started October 1, 2005. The House
Appropriations Committee originally cut $45 million from the President's
budget, $25 million of which was earmarked for expenses related to the
Census Bureau's new headquarters building in Suitland, MD. The full
House cut an additional $10 million from 2010 census planning activities
and $10 million from the Salaries and Expenses account to pay for
anti-drug programs in the Justice Department.
In the conference report (H.Rept. 109-272), appropriators instructed the
bureau to proceed with plans for the ACS and for updating the master
address list and digital mapping system (TIGER) as proposed in the
President's original budget. Within 60 days, the agency must submit a
financial operating plan outlining how it will spend it FY06 funds.
Lawmakers urged the Census Bureau to take steps to reduce the number of
personal visits in its surveys, noting the high cost associated with
field follow-up activities. With regard to ongoing research into ACS
methods, conferees told the bureau to streamline data collection as much
as possible and to ensure that survey questions are easy to understand.
Conferees commended the bureau for working with stakeholders to ensure
an accurate count of Hispanic subgroups and for considering ways to
include the population of Puerto Rico when reporting data on the United
States. The conference bill includes language, first adopted last year,
barring the Census Bureau from dropping the Some other race option
from the race question.
The Census Bureau must also submit a report to Congress within 90 days,
on the possibility of counting prisoners at their permanent homes of
record, instead of at their place of incarceration. Under current
census residence rules, inmates are counted at the prison or jail in
which they are held.
The bureau's Salaries and Expenses account, which funds ongoing economic
and demographic data collection activities, received about $198 million,
the amount approved by the House. Conferees highlighted their interest
in several trade reports and requested a one-time report on 2005
domestic sock production.
The House and Senate will vote separately on the conference bill, which
cannot be amended, before the current Continuing Funding Resolution
expires on November 18. The measure will then be sent to the President
for his signature (or veto).
In related news of interest to many census data users, appropriators
allocated roughly $76.3 million for the Commerce Department's Bureau of
Economic Analysis, $5 million less than the President requested. BEA, a
part of the Economics and Statistics Administration, publishes key
measures of the economy, including Gross Domestic Product.
Former Census directors weigh in: In a letter last week to conferees,
three former Census Bureau directors hailed the ACS as a cost-effective
innovation that provides detailed and timely information relevant to
effective government and a program that will benefit the country
disproportionately to the costs involved. Barbara Everitt Bryant
(1989-92), Martha Farnsworth Riche (1992-97), and Kenneth Prewitt
(1998-2000) also warned that inadequate field testing would put the 2010
census at risk. The directors urged Congress to reach a clear
understanding [with the Commerce Department] about what the nation needs
and can afford for the 2010 decennial census.
The directors letter was circulated to all House members by Federalism
and the Census Subcommittee Chairman Michael Turner (R-OH), Ranking
Minority Member Wm. Lacy Clay (D-MO), and member Carolyn Maloney (D-NY).
(Formated table attached)
Census News Briefs are prepared by Terri Ann Lowenthal, an independent
consultant in Washington, DC, with support from The Annie E. Casey
Foundation and other organizations. Ms. Lowenthal is also a consultant
to The Census Project, sponsored by the Communications Consortium Media
Center. All views expressed in the News Briefs are solely those of the
author. Please direct questions about the information in this News
Brief to Ms. Lowenthal at 202/484-3067 or by e-mail at
TerriAnn2K(a)aol.com. Please feel free to circulate this document to
other interested individuals and organizations.
--
Ed Christopher
Resource Center Planning Team
Federal Highway Administration
19900 Governors Drive
Olympia Fields, Illinois 60461
708-283-3534 (V) 708-574-8131 (cell)
708-283-3501 (F)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Census funding update: GOOD NEWS!
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:06:07 EST
From: Terriann2K(a)aol.com
Hello, census stakeholders. News has trickled out from the House-Senate
conference committee which yesterday considered the Census Bureau's
Fiscal Year 2006 appropriations bill. Congressional sources tell me,
and the Associated Press is reporting, that conferees agreed to the
House-passed funding level of roughly $812.2 million. We do not have any
additional details. Conferees are expected to file their joint report
on Monday. The report should contain more detail on how (if) the funds
are broken down by account (Periodic Censuses and Programs, and Salaries
and Expenses) and activity. It also might include directives, such as a
request for a report on alternative ways to count prisoners in the
census (as the House included in its report). The apparent conference
figure is still $65 million below the President's budget request, so the
Census Bureau must determine how it will carry out its plans within this
budget. Good work, everyone. There is no question in my mind that the
focused effort of stakeholders, to let legislators know the importance
of Census Bureau data, pushed the outcome in the right direction. Terri
Ann Terri Ann Lowenthal
Legislative & Policy Consultant
1250 4th St., SW
Apt. W615
Washington, DC 20024
(tel.) 202-484-3067
(cell) 202-258-2425
TerriAnn2K(a)aol.com
***************************