ABJ30-Friends June 2008

abj30-friends@mailman.chrispy.net

5 participants
3 discussions

Preparing our Committee Annual Agenda for Publication by Friday!!!

by Catherine T Lawson

ABJ30 Members and Friends, I just received a request from Tom Palmerlee (see below) to forward him our agenda for the Annual TRB Meeting - (subcommittees - this also applies to you) - since we won't have our regular opportunity to develop the agenda at our Mid-Year in time for this request - can I get some volunteers to help with the preparation? I will plan to include the review of our Strategic Plan and special attention to the topics that we currently cover - any suggestions, etc. would be greatly appreciated as this description of our plans should help bring newcomers to our meeting - thanks! >From Tom Palmerlee: "I would like to post short agendas for the TRB committee and subcommittee meetings a week before the Advance Registration deadline so we can make attendees aware of these open meeting. So please send me a short version oriented to those who don't necessarily attend TRB committee meeting. Emphasize the programmatic issues to be discussed, not administrative items. If I get it by next Monday, we can post them and get an email out about week before the deadline. I will also put those agendas in the final program." Regards, Kate --- _____________________________ Catherine T. Lawson, Ph. D. Director, MRP Program Associate Professor University at Albany Geography & Planning AS 218 1400 Washington Albany, New York 12222 (518) 442-4775 (518) 442-4742 FAX lawsonc(a)albany.edu

16 years, 6 months

one more time - agenda for the mid-year meeting now -

by Catherine T Lawson

ABJ30 Members and Friends, I just received another email - this one from David Floyd, referencing the deadline for registration for NATMEC - I have put in a call to Tom to clarify that what he needs RIGHT NOW is our agenda for NATMEC (but it doesn't hurt to get busy with our Annual TRB Meeting agenda as well - so any ideas for that meeting - please send them along) - meanwhile, we'll focus on the NATMEC agenda - sorry for the confusion - (my fault for jumping ahead to January!!) - thanks! Regards, Kate --- _____________________________ Catherine T. Lawson, Ph. D. Director, MRP Program Associate Professor University at Albany Geography & Planning AS 218 1400 Washington Albany, New York 12222 (518) 442-4775 (518) 442-4742 FAX lawsonc(a)albany.edu

16 years, 6 months

ABJ30 Members and Friends

by Catherine T Lawson

ABJ30 Committee Members and Friends, We now have the final Data & Information Systems Section Retreat Report (attached) and it is time to move forward with our combined support for the Section Initiatives - and to get our own Committee priorities (also attached) transformed into real Research Statements with funding possibilities. The Annual Meeting is taking shape (see attached "Plans in the Works" )- so far - we are supporting an ADUS Applications Workshop, co-sponsoring the NHTS Workshop and a workshop on practical ways to improve transportation-related data. We still need to get the Census Sub Committee and the Joint ADUS Committee scheduled. National Data is heading up the Travel Data Users Forum - more details soon. Hopefully, some of the ideas below from Members and Friends will be addressed in the "Practical Ways" Workshop - but I would encourage everyone to provide feedback on moving these areas of interest so they can reach the Research Statement stage - and we can start looking for sponsors and funding! Hope to see everyone at NATMEC!!!!! Kate Ideas from Committee Members -- Vladimir Livshits, Ph. D, M. Sc System Analysis Program Manager vlivshits(a)mag.maricopa.gov I. Information systems - GIS as an integration base: development of GIS-T and transportation multi-year master networks. We are trying to integrate supply data with TIP/RTP/LCP information; LRS-based systems - might be good for 1/2 day workshop. The system integrates data flow across MPO business processes from collection to modeling to Regional Plan. - Data integration: One direction: supply data counts - travel time - safety data (we are doing a project on this right now) Another direction - integration along business processes in metropolitan planning (data collection / acquisition - data management - data control and analysis - forecasting/modeling - planning) - Data accessibility/analysis - we still have a long way to go here. Looks like private sector is leading now. Might be a good topic for a workshop or a session. I mean web-based technologies and analytical tools that will facilitate data utilization. Its related to the previous two. II. Possible items for cooperation with ABJ40 - where emerging problems/issues with travel surveys can be addressed with new technology: - household surveys: changes in people's behavior and communication technology resulted in ever dropping response rates and necessity to look for different methods of data collection (cell phones surveys, GPS, progress, issues) - They have some calls for papers on this, but it seems like some important issues are still not getting enough attention, how survey methodology affects applicability of the results, etc. - household surveys: move to bigger samples - should we go back to this direction? (that is still the approach in Canada, for example) - Intercept surveys are under fire in some places (there is an excellent TTI report on this) and we encourage advancements in automated data collection (cameras, etc.) again, issues: cooperation with DOT on license plate information, road closure permits for installations, quality of the data, etc. - Travel time and speed data: move from floating car technology to an ongoing data collection by third parties - implications - Transit surveys - struggle with low completion rates - Truck travel surveys - low response rates, how new technology can help us, how we can establish channels of cooperation with private sector, place for the new collection techniques - Luck of independent data sets for travel forecasting model validation (survey data normally used 100% for estimation/calibration), supply data can be used only for certain final validations - Data requirements of the Activity-Based Models, how the movement towards disaggregation and microsimulation in modeling affects data collection Ideas from Committee Friends Ken Dueker (duekerk(a)aol.com) One data area that Dick Lycan and I have been concerned with is working (mandates or incentive) with Assessor's to gather accurate counts of number of units housing units on parcels of land. An accurate count of HUs is important to many demographic based transportation demand models. Yet it is not counted with care by assessors and they have not incentive or mandate to do so. --- _____________________________ Catherine T. Lawson, Ph. D. Director, MRP Program Associate Professor University at Albany Geography & Planning AS 218 1400 Washington Albany, New York 12222 (518) 442-4775 (518) 442-4742 FAX lawsonc(a)albany.edu

16 years, 6 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

ABJ30-Friends June 2008