This is a little different from the Spreadsheet I sent out
earlier, in that the spreadsheet is modified and there is a link to a webinar
on June 7th to discuss the table request.
From http://ctpp.transportation.org/Pages/5yrACSdata.aspx
:
Here
is your chance to help us make the CTPP based on ACS five-year estimates the
best possible data tool for transportation planners. Help us determine our
request to the US Census Bureau based on your transportation planning needs.
Join
us at a webinar to discuss the five-year table request, learn about CTPP,
and let yourself be heard—June 7th, 2010,
1–3 pm eastern.
The
spreadsheet linked here contains several elements. It combines:
For
large area geography, we plan to keep the table list the same as the current
3-year table list.
For
small area geography (tract, TAZ, and block group), we are proposing to
eliminate many of the tables with 3-way cross-tabulations, or 2-way
cross-tabulations with more than 40 cells. If you see tables that you use on
the "planning to not request" list please let me know at ctppinfo@aashto.org.
The
number of classifications in each variable may need to be reduced to pass the
CB's criteria and some of those tables have been tagged in the column called
Modifications to be discussed for 5-yr data table request; we are including
this information to start thinking about the ways variable groups can collapse.
For the
ACS 2006-2010 five-year data and the 2010 Census Tracts, there is projected to
be, on average, a little over 4000 residents per tract, and approximately 120
household records and 150 worker records in the unweighted sample. Each TAZ, of
course, will have many fewer.
Penelope Weinberger
CTPP Program Manager
AASHTO
202-624-3556
http://ctpp.transportation.org/Pages/default.aspx
It's just as bad to not make a plan as to blindly follow the
one you already have.