I used the TIGER Reader extension for ArcView and found the same thing. It reads the 2000 UA, but labels the field UA90, and it truncates the last digit (gives only 4, should be 5) of the UA code.
I loaded in the 1990 Urban Area .shp file as well,
(downloaded from census website http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/ua1990.html yesterday) to be certain. The area I was looking at is a UA in 2000, but wasn't in 1990. So this confirmed that the TIGER Reader extension is reading in the UA 2000 boundaries, it just labels them UA90 (and drops the last digit of the code!).
Thanks to everyone who has posted on this subject so far. It made my job much easier!
Leigh Oesterling, Transportation Planner
Modeling & Forecasting Section
Office of Technical Services
Ohio Department of Transportation
(614) 752-5747 FAX (614) 752-8646
Leigh Oesterling
Modeling & Forecasting Section
Office of Technical Services
Ohio Department of Transportation
(614) 752-5747 FAX (614) 752-8646
"Wrafter, Eoin" <ewrafter@co.dutchess.ny.us> Sent by: owner-ctpp-news@chrispy.net
05/09/02 08:15 AM
To: "Brian Lakeman" <Blakeman@gtcmpo.org>
cc: <ctpp-news@chrispy.net>
Subject: RE: [CTPP] UA conversion
I agree Brian I too had someone do the conversion in ArcInfo and it
matched the results from TIGER reader in ArcView 3.2. Although the
field name is incorrect it appears the underlying data maybe correct.
Eoin Wrafter, AICP
Senior Planner
Poughkeepsie-Dutchess County Transportation Council
27 High Street, 2nd Floor
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Phone (845) 486-3600 Fax (845) 486-3610
ewrafter@co.dutchess.ny.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Lakeman [mailto:Blakeman@gtcmpo.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:41 PM
To: 'Banette Kritzky'; kwillet@ardc.org; ctpp-news@chrispy.net;
treinauer@edd.uct.usm.maine.edu
Subject: RE: [CTPP] UA conversion
I too have found this. I had someone with Arc/Info graciously convert a
few
counties worth of 2000UA data for me. When I ran TIGER Reader in ArcView
and
chose "Urbanized Areas 1990" as the field to extract, the results
matched up
exactly with the Arc/Info converted files. Has anyone else noticed this?
It
appears that TIGER Reader may be doing the conversion correctly, even
though
the field is named incorrectly.
Brian Lakeman
Genesee Transportation Council
-----Original Message-----
From: Banette Kritzky [mailto:banette.kritzky@dot.state.mn.us]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 2:50 PM
To: kwillet@ardc.org; ctpp-news@chrispy.net;
treinauer@edd.uct.usm.maine.edu
Subject: Re: [CTPP] UA conversion
I also used the Tiger Reader in ArcView 3.2a in an attempt to
extract
the UAs. I am, however, puzzled by the following: a) if this Reader
only
extracts 1990 data, why was one of the layers titled ALR/LUCA 2000; and
b)
after reprojecting the extracted UA90 layer and overlaying my block2000
census data, why do the boundaries match up almost exactly (except for a
couple of donut holes) ? Could it be possible the Reader actually
extracted
the 2000 data, but is using the old field naming convention?
This list serve has been a great relief knowing there are others out
there trying to work through the same problems.
Banette
===================================
Banette Kritzky
GIS Coordinator
Mn/DOT Office of Investment Management
MS 440, 3rd Floor, Mn/DOT Central Office
395 John Ireland Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
(651) 296-0220
banette.kritzky@dot.state.mn.us
>>> "Tom Reinauer" <treinauer@edd.uct.usm.maine.edu> 5/8/2002 12:08:26
PM
>>>
I tried using Tiger Reader in ArcView 3.2a and have had no luck. The UA
data record also appears to be 1990, not 2000.
We have cross-border issues and split urbanized areas and would really
like
to see the new boundaries before the Fall.
Someone out there must know of a fairly simple process(or develop a
simple
process) to convert the boundary data into an ArcView shape file,
considering the proliferation of ESRI products.
Tom Reinauer, Transportation Director
Southern Maine RPC
21 Bradeen St. Suite 304
Springvale, ME 04083
(207)324-2952
FAX -2958
treinauer@server.eddmaine.org
www.smrpc.maine.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kendis Willet" <kwillet@ardc.org>
To: <ctpp-news@chrispy.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:52 AM
Subject: [CTPP] UA conversion
> So, if you are using Arcview 3.2 and ArcInfo 8.1 and are not able to
buy a
> third party software, a person can't process these UA boundaries off
the
> Census site?
>
> Thanks,
> Kendis
>
>
> Kendis Willet
> GIS Specialist
> Metropolitan Interstate Committee
> Email: kwillet@ardc.org