I have know others to use similar approaches. However, one question that remains, which is more of a research question is which ACS series to use. 2006 to 2010 or 2008 to 2012?  I can make good arguments to go either way.  

Ed C

On Jan 2, 2014, at 12:01 PM, "Joe Huegy" <jbhuegy@ncsu.edu> wrote:

Geoff,

I cannot provide guidance, but you might find our recent experience helpful. We have used 2010 SF1 data for households by size and ACS 5 year (2006-2010) shares for income. We chose this approach to be consistent with 2006-2010 ACS PUMS data that we also use, and in the absence of other information.  

 

Joe

 

Joseph Huegy, AICP

Director

Travel Behavior Modeling Group

ITRE – NCSU

Box 8601

Raleigh, NC 27695-8601

ph. 919.513.7378

cell 919.606.8634

fax 919.515.8898

email: jbhuegy@ncsu.edu

web: http://www.itre.ncsu.edu

 

 

 

From: ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Geoff Olson
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 9:59 AM
To: 'ctpp-news@chrispy.net'
Subject: [CTPP] Census 2010 vs 5-year ACS for TAZs

 

Hello Everyone,

 

Ive gotten started on our long range transportation plan, and one area we have an issue with is Census data.  We've got 2010 Census data for our population and household counts, but we will also need the 5-year ACS data of number of households by household size by household income.  We would prefer to use 2010 population counts for the base year of the model so we've decided there are two options.  We could use the 5-year ACS data for our base model year population and household counts, but that doesn't create a true picture of 2010.  The other option is we could mix datasets and proportionately apply characteristics of the 5-year ACS data to the 2010 counts.  Can anyone give us some guidance needing to use both datasets on the same project?

 

Thank you,

Geoff Olson

Transportation Planner
Bi-State Regional Commission

1504 3rd Ave.
P.O. Box 3368
Rock Island, IL 61204

 


This email and all attachments are intended only for the listed recipient(s). This message may contain confidential or privileged information only for use by the listed recipient(s). Do not forward, post or otherwise disclose the contents of this email without the permission of the sender. If you received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Bi-State Regional Commission accepts no responsibility for any damages caused by this message, including those related to viruses or malware.

_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news@ryoko.chrispy.net
http://ryoko.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news