Who in the world made the decision that
the media should get the data before the professional community? Seems strange
to me.
Steven E. Polzin, Ph.D.
Center for Urban Transportation Research
813-974-9849 (w)
813-416-7517 (c)
polzin@cutr.usf.edu
From: ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net
[mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On
Behalf Of Alan Pisarski
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006
7:39 AM
To: 'Murakami, Elaine';
ctpp-news@chrispy.net
Cc: Srinivasan, Nanda
Subject: RE: [CTPP] October 3 is
the next scheduled release of ACStablesincluding PLACE OF WORK!
USA Today has the data and is planning a
fairly major play on the release date. AEP
From:
ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Murakami, Elaine
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006
7:46 PM
To: ctpp-news@chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] October 3 is the
next scheduled release of ACS tablesincluding PLACE OF WORK!
How time flies! Just when you
thought you were getting a handle on the journey-to-work data from the 2005
ACS, the next round of data will released! The next set will include
Place of Work tabulations. >From the CTPP world, these are like
“CTPP Part 2” tables, where the tabulation is by place-of-work,
rather than place-of-residence. Since the 2005 ACS included ALL
counties in the sample, the place-of-work tabulations should look much better
than the 2004 ACS place-of-work tabulations (about one-third of counties were
included in the sample).
Don’t forget:
1. 2005 ACS does not include
Group Quarters population. That is, areas with large military
installations and/or college dormitories should expect considerable differences
when comparing to Census 2000 results.
2. The data are collected over
all 12 months, therefore areas with seasonal shifts are likely to see the
greatest differences when comparing to Census 2000 results.
Good luck! Nanda Srinivasan,
Ed Christopher and I are trying to wrap up our new Profile sheets using the
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460 (in