Now that the Census Bureau is busy releasing the 2006 ACS
data, I thought it would be timely to post a few links on using the ACS
data. It is VERY IMPORTANT to understand that the biggest difference
between the 2006 and 2005 ACS is that GROUP QUARTERS population was ADDED in
the 2006 sample. Areas with large Group Quarters population will
see the greatest differences between 2006 and 2005 results. Workers who
live in Group Quarters are more likely to walk to work, so you may see shifts
in distributions of means of transportation to work in these areas. The
population threshold for reporting 1-year ACS data is still 65,000 persons,
based on place of residence. The 2005 and 2006 ACS standard tabulation include
tabulations for PLACE OF WORK called “for workplace geography”.
Also, the “key” to finding tables on “journey to work”
is “08”, for example: B08###, or C08###, or S08##.
Cynthia Taeuber’s book, “American Community
Survey data in Community Planning” (Trafford Publishing, 2006 website:
trafford.com/06-2809 ) is an easy-to-understand document
that covers basic information about ACS, but most importantly, understanding
sampling error and confidence intervals. Note: The Census Bureau is
now using the term “Margin of Error” to reflect sampling
error instead of using confidence intervals (the estimate with an upper and
lower bound).
You can order it directly from Trafford.com, which is a “print
on demand” publishing house, but I just found it on Amazon.
(priced at $26.37 and listed as “in stock” )
Also, Cynthia’s material completed for Brookings
Institute “for journalists” is on-line at:
http://www.brookings.edu/metro/umi/events/20061115_ACSreferenceguide.pdf
This document on the Census Bureau’s webpage
discussing the 2005 ACS is also useful.
http://www.census.gov/acs/www/UseData/advance_copy_user_guide.pdf
The FHWA page also includes some material on using ACS data,
which was developed for earlier releases of ACS, but are still relevant.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census/acs.htm
Because we prepared profiles sheets from the 2005 ACS data,
with comparison to Census 2000, we are currently NOT planning to issue NEW
profiles using the 2006 data. We are currently focusing on PLANS for the
NEXT CTPP, using the first 3 year accumulation of ACS data (2005, 2006, and
2007), and conducting research on 1) improving workplace imputation for
ungeocoded survey responses, and 2) alternative approaches to disclosure
avoidance, to avoid the data suppression problems that arose in the
CTPP2000.
If you have ideas for the 3-year CTPP product, especially
NEW or DIFFERENT Tables, please let me know!
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460