As some of you know, we (the transportation data community)
have not had much success using the CB’s
While glancing at the CES RDC website today, I noticed that
several “discussion papers” over the past few years (2005 through
current) have included analysis using the 1990 and 2000 decennial census
“long form” data to examine patterns of home-to-work. 2004 ACS
data are included on the list of available data at the RDC. Typically, these
analyses focus on “labor market outcomes.”
http://www.ces.census.gov/index.php/ces/1.00/cmshome
Here are a few that I found:
Hellerstein, Judith K; David Neumark; and Melissa
McInerney. “Spatial Mismatch or Racial Mismatch? “ CES 07-16.
June 2007.
Job density and employment rates are compared between black
and white population (no break-out for “Hispanic”), The authors
use the term “racial mismatch” to mean a “lack of jobs into
which blacks are hired,” in contrast to “spatial mismatch”
that argues that jobs are not located near to where people live contributing
to lack of employment. They
found that space alone plays a relatively minor role in low black male
employment rates. They find that jobs that are “available
to blacks” is more important, especially for workers with lower
education.
Wang, Qingfang “How does Geography Matter in Ethnic
Labor Market Segmentation Process? A Case Study of Chinese in the San
Francisco CMSA” CES-WP-07-09 March 2007
The authors defined Chinese residence and workplace
concentrations in the
Bayer, Patrick; Stephen L. Ross, and Giorgio Topa.
“Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and
Labor Market Outcomes.” CES 05-23 October 2005.
The 1990 Census “long form” data was used to
measure social interaction by comparing the propensity of individuals living in
the same vs. nearby blocks to work in the same location. They found that
residing on the same block increased the probability of working together by
over 33 percent. When the characteristics of persons (age, education and
presence of children) matched, these interactions were even stronger.
Fu, Shine. “Smart Café Cities: Testing Human Capital
Externalities in the
“Human Capital Externalities” or
“knowledge spillover” are benefits that accrue to workers from
being close to a dense skilled labor market. Most work done on these
externalities have been at the macro-scale of metropolitan areas. This effort
examines microgeographic scale of externalities by using census tracts, block
groups and blocks. This paper used the 1990 Census long form data using worker
and job characteristics and job location. They found that these benefits are
very localized within microgeographic scales.
So, the good news is that other people besides the
transportation community have benefited from the detailed PLACE OF WORK geocoding
in the Decennial Census “long form.” What can we learn from this? To
get projects approved in the CES RDC system, we would probably have better luck
if we discussed our research in terms of economic productivity and labor market
benefits, rather than benefiting transportation planning. Also, we can expect
that researchers on labor market outcomes will want to use ACS results on place
of work in the future.
Elaine Murakami